坚持使用iFightDepression®抑郁症在线自助工具-一项试点研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna Varga, Edit Czeglédi, Kálmán Erdélyi, Szilvia Gyömbér, Noémi Szeifert, Ditta Mónika Tóth, György Purebl
{"title":"坚持使用iFightDepression®抑郁症在线自助工具-一项试点研究。","authors":"Anna Varga,&nbsp;Edit Czeglédi,&nbsp;Kálmán Erdélyi,&nbsp;Szilvia Gyömbér,&nbsp;Noémi Szeifert,&nbsp;Ditta Mónika Tóth,&nbsp;György Purebl","doi":"10.18071/isz.76.0221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>The aim of the current observational study was to examine the level of adherence of Hungarian patients suffering from depression, using iFightDep&shy;ression (iFD) guided online self-help tool with and without an extra weekly phone call support as well as identifying the predictors of adherence. Our hypotheses were: the additional weekly phone-calls would increase the adherence with the online self-help tool; furthermore, symptoms of depression will significantly decrease in the weekly phone support group.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>During the 6 weeks of iFD&reg; intervention, patients were divided into two groups: the first, alongside of the treatment as usual (TAU) and iFD&reg;, received a 20-minu&shy;tes weekly phone call support while the other group partook in only the TAU+iFD&reg; intervention. Measures: number of completed modules and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The study included 102 participants with diagnosis of depression (70% female, mean age: 36.9 [SD = 11.40] ys).&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Participants completed on average 4.8 (SD = 1.73) out of 6 modules. The intervention group with additional phone support completed more modules than the group of no additional phone calls (Z = &ndash;5.416, p &lt; 0.001, rank Cohen&rsquo;s d = &ndash;1.267). Participants with higher level of education completed more modules than those with lower level of education (Z = &ndash;2.198, p = 0.028, rank Cohen&rsquo;s d = &ndash;0.444). Baseline depressive symptoms correlated negatively with the number of completed modules (rS = &ndash;0.22, p = 0.028). Depressive symptoms were significantly reduced between the two measurement points (main effect of time: (F(1) = 179.173,&nbsp;p &lt; 0.001, partial &eta;2 = 0.642), the improvement was significantly larger in the iFD&reg; + phone support group (time &times; group interaction: F(1) = 6.492, p = 0.012, partial &eta;2 = 0.061).</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Weekly phone support increased treatment adherence. Negative correlation of symptom severity with adherence suggests that iFD can be effective in mild or moderate forms of depression. With regards to sociodemographic variables, only the level of education showed significant correlation with adherence. Our results support applicability of the iFD intervention in various kinds of sociodemographic groups.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to the iFightDepression® online self-help tool for depression - A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Varga,&nbsp;Edit Czeglédi,&nbsp;Kálmán Erdélyi,&nbsp;Szilvia Gyömbér,&nbsp;Noémi Szeifert,&nbsp;Ditta Mónika Tóth,&nbsp;György Purebl\",\"doi\":\"10.18071/isz.76.0221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>The aim of the current observational study was to examine the level of adherence of Hungarian patients suffering from depression, using iFightDep&shy;ression (iFD) guided online self-help tool with and without an extra weekly phone call support as well as identifying the predictors of adherence. Our hypotheses were: the additional weekly phone-calls would increase the adherence with the online self-help tool; furthermore, symptoms of depression will significantly decrease in the weekly phone support group.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>During the 6 weeks of iFD&reg; intervention, patients were divided into two groups: the first, alongside of the treatment as usual (TAU) and iFD&reg;, received a 20-minu&shy;tes weekly phone call support while the other group partook in only the TAU+iFD&reg; intervention. Measures: number of completed modules and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The study included 102 participants with diagnosis of depression (70% female, mean age: 36.9 [SD = 11.40] ys).&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Participants completed on average 4.8 (SD = 1.73) out of 6 modules. The intervention group with additional phone support completed more modules than the group of no additional phone calls (Z = &ndash;5.416, p &lt; 0.001, rank Cohen&rsquo;s d = &ndash;1.267). Participants with higher level of education completed more modules than those with lower level of education (Z = &ndash;2.198, p = 0.028, rank Cohen&rsquo;s d = &ndash;0.444). Baseline depressive symptoms correlated negatively with the number of completed modules (rS = &ndash;0.22, p = 0.028). Depressive symptoms were significantly reduced between the two measurement points (main effect of time: (F(1) = 179.173,&nbsp;p &lt; 0.001, partial &eta;2 = 0.642), the improvement was significantly larger in the iFD&reg; + phone support group (time &times; group interaction: F(1) = 6.492, p = 0.012, partial &eta;2 = 0.061).</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Weekly phone support increased treatment adherence. Negative correlation of symptom severity with adherence suggests that iFD can be effective in mild or moderate forms of depression. With regards to sociodemographic variables, only the level of education showed significant correlation with adherence. Our results support applicability of the iFD intervention in various kinds of sociodemographic groups.</p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:当前观察性研究的目的是检查匈牙利抑郁症患者的依从性水平,使用ifight深度抑郁量表(iFD)指导的在线自助工具,有或没有额外的每周电话支持,并确定依从性的预测因素。我们的假设是:额外的每周电话会增加在线自助工具的依从性;此外,每周电话支持组的抑郁症状明显减轻。干预后,患者被分为两组:第一组,除了常规治疗(TAU)和iFD®,每周接受20分钟的电话支持,而另一组只接受TAU+iFD®干预。测量方法:完成的模块数量和患者健康问卷-9。本研究纳入102名诊断为抑郁症的参与者(70%为女性,平均年龄36.9岁[SD = 11.40]岁)。结果:参与者平均完成了6个模块中的4.8个(SD = 1.73)。有额外电话支持的干预组比没有额外电话支持的干预组完成的模块更多(Z = –5.416, p <0.001, rank Cohen’s d = –1.267)。受教育程度较高的参与者比受教育程度较低的参与者完成了更多的模块(Z = 2.198, p = 0.028, Cohen’ d = –0.444)。基线抑郁症状与完成模块的数量呈负相关(rS = 0.22, p = 0.028)。抑郁症状在两个测点之间显著减轻(时间的主效应:(F(1) = 179.173, p <0.001,部分η2 = 0.642), iFD®的改善明显更大;+电话支持小组(时间&次;群体相互作用:F(1) = 6.492, p = 0.012, partial η2 = 0.061)。结论:每周电话支持增加治疗依从性。症状严重程度与依从性呈负相关,表明iFD对轻度或中度抑郁症有效。在社会人口学变量方面,只有教育水平与依从性有显著相关。我们的结果支持iFD干预在各种社会人口群体中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence to the iFightDepression® online self-help tool for depression - A pilot study.

Background and purpose:

The aim of the current observational study was to examine the level of adherence of Hungarian patients suffering from depression, using iFightDep­ression (iFD) guided online self-help tool with and without an extra weekly phone call support as well as identifying the predictors of adherence. Our hypotheses were: the additional weekly phone-calls would increase the adherence with the online self-help tool; furthermore, symptoms of depression will significantly decrease in the weekly phone support group.

.

Methods:

During the 6 weeks of iFD® intervention, patients were divided into two groups: the first, alongside of the treatment as usual (TAU) and iFD®, received a 20-minu­tes weekly phone call support while the other group partook in only the TAU+iFD® intervention. Measures: number of completed modules and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The study included 102 participants with diagnosis of depression (70% female, mean age: 36.9 [SD = 11.40] ys). 

.

Results:

Participants completed on average 4.8 (SD = 1.73) out of 6 modules. The intervention group with additional phone support completed more modules than the group of no additional phone calls (Z = –5.416, p < 0.001, rank Cohen’s d = –1.267). Participants with higher level of education completed more modules than those with lower level of education (Z = –2.198, p = 0.028, rank Cohen’s d = –0.444). Baseline depressive symptoms correlated negatively with the number of completed modules (rS = –0.22, p = 0.028). Depressive symptoms were significantly reduced between the two measurement points (main effect of time: (F(1) = 179.173, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.642), the improvement was significantly larger in the iFD® + phone support group (time × group interaction: F(1) = 6.492, p = 0.012, partial η2 = 0.061).

.

Conclusion:

Weekly phone support increased treatment adherence. Negative correlation of symptom severity with adherence suggests that iFD can be effective in mild or moderate forms of depression. With regards to sociodemographic variables, only the level of education showed significant correlation with adherence. Our results support applicability of the iFD intervention in various kinds of sociodemographic groups.

.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信