{"title":"注意多个目标时节奏注意取样的适应灵活性。","authors":"Yong Jiang, Sheng He, Jiedong Zhang","doi":"10.1037/xge0001468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent behavioral and neural imaging studies revealed a rhythmic sampling in the theta-band (3-8 Hz) of attention. Such observation indicates that visual attention sequentially visits attended locations rapidly and periodically to cover multiple spatial locations, which is believed driven by a general sampling mechanism with a sampling rate invariant to the number of targets. However, a general sampling mechanism with a fixed rate would lead to the consequence that it would take longer time for attention to revisit the same item when attention needs to cover more items, which could impair perceptual continuity. It is unclear whether and how the attentional sampling mechanism can flexibly adapt to varying task demand to balance between covering more items and maintaining stable perception. Here with five behavioral experiments, we investigated how the sequential sampling mechanism adapts to the need of attending to from one to four locations. With state-of-the-art analysis methods, results show clear evidence of sequential sampling in attending to multiple locations, that both theta-band oscillations and phase-shift among different locations were observed in the behavioral performance. At each location, the oscillation period increased when the attended locations increased from one to three, maintaining a relatively stable attention-dwelling time at each location. Critically, oscillation period remained essentially the same from three to four, suggesting a flexible task-driven acceleration of attentional sampling to keep the revisiting duration within a reasonable range. Thus, our results reveal that the generally stable rhythmic attention mechanism could flexibly adjust its sampling rate to accommodate increased attentional demands. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":"26-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The adaptive flexibility of rhythmic attentional sampling in attending to multiple targets.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Jiang, Sheng He, Jiedong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xge0001468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent behavioral and neural imaging studies revealed a rhythmic sampling in the theta-band (3-8 Hz) of attention. Such observation indicates that visual attention sequentially visits attended locations rapidly and periodically to cover multiple spatial locations, which is believed driven by a general sampling mechanism with a sampling rate invariant to the number of targets. However, a general sampling mechanism with a fixed rate would lead to the consequence that it would take longer time for attention to revisit the same item when attention needs to cover more items, which could impair perceptual continuity. It is unclear whether and how the attentional sampling mechanism can flexibly adapt to varying task demand to balance between covering more items and maintaining stable perception. Here with five behavioral experiments, we investigated how the sequential sampling mechanism adapts to the need of attending to from one to four locations. With state-of-the-art analysis methods, results show clear evidence of sequential sampling in attending to multiple locations, that both theta-band oscillations and phase-shift among different locations were observed in the behavioral performance. At each location, the oscillation period increased when the attended locations increased from one to three, maintaining a relatively stable attention-dwelling time at each location. Critically, oscillation period remained essentially the same from three to four, suggesting a flexible task-driven acceleration of attentional sampling to keep the revisiting duration within a reasonable range. Thus, our results reveal that the generally stable rhythmic attention mechanism could flexibly adjust its sampling rate to accommodate increased attentional demands. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001468\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的行为学和神经成像研究发现,注意力在θ波段(3-8赫兹)有节奏地采样。这种观察结果表明,视觉注意力会快速、周期性地依次访问被注意的位置,以覆盖多个空间位置,这被认为是由采样率与目标数量无关的一般采样机制驱动的。然而,如果采用固定速率的一般取样机制,则会导致当注意力需要覆盖更多项目时,需要更长的时间重新访问同一项目,从而影响知觉的连续性。目前还不清楚注意取样机制是否以及如何灵活适应不同的任务需求,在覆盖更多项目和保持知觉稳定之间取得平衡。在这里,我们通过五项行为实验研究了顺序取样机制如何适应从一个到四个位置的注意需求。通过最先进的分析方法,实验结果表明,在关注多个位置时,顺序采样机制有明确的证据,在行为表现中可以观察到θ波段振荡和不同位置间的相移。在每个地点,当注意的地点从一个增加到三个时,振荡周期会增加,在每个地点保持相对稳定的注意停留时间。重要的是,振荡周期从三个增加到四个时基本保持不变,这表明任务驱动的注意采样会灵活加速,从而将重访时间保持在合理的范围内。因此,我们的研究结果表明,普遍稳定的节律注意机制可以灵活地调整其采样率,以适应增加的注意需求。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
The adaptive flexibility of rhythmic attentional sampling in attending to multiple targets.
Recent behavioral and neural imaging studies revealed a rhythmic sampling in the theta-band (3-8 Hz) of attention. Such observation indicates that visual attention sequentially visits attended locations rapidly and periodically to cover multiple spatial locations, which is believed driven by a general sampling mechanism with a sampling rate invariant to the number of targets. However, a general sampling mechanism with a fixed rate would lead to the consequence that it would take longer time for attention to revisit the same item when attention needs to cover more items, which could impair perceptual continuity. It is unclear whether and how the attentional sampling mechanism can flexibly adapt to varying task demand to balance between covering more items and maintaining stable perception. Here with five behavioral experiments, we investigated how the sequential sampling mechanism adapts to the need of attending to from one to four locations. With state-of-the-art analysis methods, results show clear evidence of sequential sampling in attending to multiple locations, that both theta-band oscillations and phase-shift among different locations were observed in the behavioral performance. At each location, the oscillation period increased when the attended locations increased from one to three, maintaining a relatively stable attention-dwelling time at each location. Critically, oscillation period remained essentially the same from three to four, suggesting a flexible task-driven acceleration of attentional sampling to keep the revisiting duration within a reasonable range. Thus, our results reveal that the generally stable rhythmic attention mechanism could flexibly adjust its sampling rate to accommodate increased attentional demands. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.