环境线索瞬时旋转对年轻和年老大鼠导航精度的不同影响。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Adam W Lester, Gianna A Jordan, Colton J Blum, Zachary P Philpot, Carol A Barnes
{"title":"环境线索瞬时旋转对年轻和年老大鼠导航精度的不同影响。","authors":"Adam W Lester, Gianna A Jordan, Colton J Blum, Zachary P Philpot, Carol A Barnes","doi":"10.1037/bne0000536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful navigation depends critically upon two broad categories of spatial navigation strategies that include allocentric and egocentric reference frames, relying on external or internal spatial information, respectively. As with older adults, aged rats show robust impairments on a number of different spatial navigation tasks. There is some evidence that these navigation impairments are accompanied by a bias toward relying on egocentric over allocentric navigation strategies. To test the degree to which young and aged animals utilize these two navigation approaches, a novel behavioral arena was used in which rats are trained to traverse a circular track and to stop at a learned goal location that is fixed with respect to a panorama of visual cues projected onto the surrounding walls. By instantaneously rotating the cues, allocentric and egocentric reference frames were put in direct and immediate conflict and goal navigation performance was assessed with respect to how accurately young and aged animals were able to utilize the rotated cues. Behavioral data collected from nine young and eight aged animals revealed that both age groups were able to update their navigation performance following cue rotation. Contrary to what was expected, however, aged animals showed more accurate overall goal navigation performance, stronger allocentric strategy use, and more evident changes in behavior in response to cue rotation compared to younger animals. The young rats appeared to mix egocentric and allocentric strategies for ICR task solution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":"136 6","pages":"561-574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects in young and aged rats' navigational accuracy following instantaneous rotation of environmental cues.\",\"authors\":\"Adam W Lester, Gianna A Jordan, Colton J Blum, Zachary P Philpot, Carol A Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/bne0000536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Successful navigation depends critically upon two broad categories of spatial navigation strategies that include allocentric and egocentric reference frames, relying on external or internal spatial information, respectively. As with older adults, aged rats show robust impairments on a number of different spatial navigation tasks. There is some evidence that these navigation impairments are accompanied by a bias toward relying on egocentric over allocentric navigation strategies. To test the degree to which young and aged animals utilize these two navigation approaches, a novel behavioral arena was used in which rats are trained to traverse a circular track and to stop at a learned goal location that is fixed with respect to a panorama of visual cues projected onto the surrounding walls. By instantaneously rotating the cues, allocentric and egocentric reference frames were put in direct and immediate conflict and goal navigation performance was assessed with respect to how accurately young and aged animals were able to utilize the rotated cues. Behavioral data collected from nine young and eight aged animals revealed that both age groups were able to update their navigation performance following cue rotation. Contrary to what was expected, however, aged animals showed more accurate overall goal navigation performance, stronger allocentric strategy use, and more evident changes in behavior in response to cue rotation compared to younger animals. The young rats appeared to mix egocentric and allocentric strategies for ICR task solution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"136 6\",\"pages\":\"561-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000536\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成功的导航主要依赖于两大类空间导航策略,分别依赖于外部或内部空间信息,包括非中心和自我中心参考框架。与老年人一样,老年大鼠在许多不同的空间导航任务上表现出明显的损伤。有一些证据表明,这些导航障碍伴随着依赖自我中心而不是非中心导航策略的偏见。为了测试幼龄和老年动物利用这两种导航方法的程度,研究人员使用了一个新的行为竞技场,在这个竞技场中,老鼠被训练穿过一个圆形轨道,并在一个习得的目标位置停下来,这个目标位置与投射到周围墙壁上的视觉线索的全景有关。通过即时旋转线索,将非中心和自我中心的参考框架置于直接和即时冲突中,并评估幼鼠和老年鼠利用旋转线索的准确程度。从9只年幼和8只年老的动物身上收集的行为数据显示,这两个年龄组都能够在线索旋转后更新他们的导航表现。然而,与预期相反,与年轻动物相比,老年动物表现出更准确的总体目标导航性能,更强的异中心策略使用,以及更明显的响应线索旋转的行为变化。年轻大鼠在ICR任务解决中表现出自我中心和非中心混合策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential effects in young and aged rats' navigational accuracy following instantaneous rotation of environmental cues.

Successful navigation depends critically upon two broad categories of spatial navigation strategies that include allocentric and egocentric reference frames, relying on external or internal spatial information, respectively. As with older adults, aged rats show robust impairments on a number of different spatial navigation tasks. There is some evidence that these navigation impairments are accompanied by a bias toward relying on egocentric over allocentric navigation strategies. To test the degree to which young and aged animals utilize these two navigation approaches, a novel behavioral arena was used in which rats are trained to traverse a circular track and to stop at a learned goal location that is fixed with respect to a panorama of visual cues projected onto the surrounding walls. By instantaneously rotating the cues, allocentric and egocentric reference frames were put in direct and immediate conflict and goal navigation performance was assessed with respect to how accurately young and aged animals were able to utilize the rotated cues. Behavioral data collected from nine young and eight aged animals revealed that both age groups were able to update their navigation performance following cue rotation. Contrary to what was expected, however, aged animals showed more accurate overall goal navigation performance, stronger allocentric strategy use, and more evident changes in behavior in response to cue rotation compared to younger animals. The young rats appeared to mix egocentric and allocentric strategies for ICR task solution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral neuroscience
Behavioral neuroscience 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Neuroscience publishes original research articles as well as reviews in the broad field of the neural bases of behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信