利用临床标记和多种可解释人工智能方法诊断 COVID-19:厄瓜多尔案例研究

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Krishnaraj Chadaga , Srikanth Prabhu , Vivekananda Bhat , Niranjana Sampathila , Shashikiran Umakanth , Sudhakara Upadya P
{"title":"利用临床标记和多种可解释人工智能方法诊断 COVID-19:厄瓜多尔案例研究","authors":"Krishnaraj Chadaga ,&nbsp;Srikanth Prabhu ,&nbsp;Vivekananda Bhat ,&nbsp;Niranjana Sampathila ,&nbsp;Shashikiran Umakanth ,&nbsp;Sudhakara Upadya P","doi":"10.1016/j.slast.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic erupted at the beginning of 2020 and proved fatal, causing many casualties worldwide. Immediate and precise screening of affected patients is critical for disease control. COVID-19 is often confused with various other respiratory disorders since the symptoms are similar. As of today, the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is utilized for diagnosing COVID-19. However, this approach is sometimes prone to producing erroneous and false negative results. Hence, finding a reliable diagnostic method that can validate the RT-PCR test results is crucial. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in COVID-19 diagnosis has proven to be beneficial. Hence, clinical markers have been utilized for COVID-19 diagnosis with the help of several classifiers in this study. Further, five different explainable artificial intelligence techniques have been utilized to interpret the predictions. Among all the algorithms, the k-nearest neighbor obtained the best performance with an accuracy, precision, recall and f1-score of 84%, 85%, 84% and 84%. According to this study, the combination of clinical markers such as eosinophils, lymphocytes, red blood cells and leukocytes was significant in differentiating COVID-19. The classifiers can be utilized synchronously with the standard RT-PCR procedure making diagnosis more reliable and efficient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54248,"journal":{"name":"SLAS Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630323000584/pdfft?md5=117d7962fc3997c83f208df14028b304&pid=1-s2.0-S2472630323000584-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 diagnosis using clinical markers and multiple explainable artificial intelligence approaches: A case study from Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Krishnaraj Chadaga ,&nbsp;Srikanth Prabhu ,&nbsp;Vivekananda Bhat ,&nbsp;Niranjana Sampathila ,&nbsp;Shashikiran Umakanth ,&nbsp;Sudhakara Upadya P\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.slast.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic erupted at the beginning of 2020 and proved fatal, causing many casualties worldwide. Immediate and precise screening of affected patients is critical for disease control. COVID-19 is often confused with various other respiratory disorders since the symptoms are similar. As of today, the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is utilized for diagnosing COVID-19. However, this approach is sometimes prone to producing erroneous and false negative results. Hence, finding a reliable diagnostic method that can validate the RT-PCR test results is crucial. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in COVID-19 diagnosis has proven to be beneficial. Hence, clinical markers have been utilized for COVID-19 diagnosis with the help of several classifiers in this study. Further, five different explainable artificial intelligence techniques have been utilized to interpret the predictions. Among all the algorithms, the k-nearest neighbor obtained the best performance with an accuracy, precision, recall and f1-score of 84%, 85%, 84% and 84%. According to this study, the combination of clinical markers such as eosinophils, lymphocytes, red blood cells and leukocytes was significant in differentiating COVID-19. The classifiers can be utilized synchronously with the standard RT-PCR procedure making diagnosis more reliable and efficient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLAS Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630323000584/pdfft?md5=117d7962fc3997c83f208df14028b304&pid=1-s2.0-S2472630323000584-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLAS Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630323000584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAS Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630323000584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行于2020年初爆发,在世界范围内造成了许多人员伤亡。对受影响患者进行即时和精确的筛查对疾病控制至关重要。由于症状相似,COVID-19经常与其他各种呼吸系统疾病混淆。目前,用于诊断新冠病毒的方法是逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)。然而,这种方法有时容易产生错误和假阴性结果。因此,寻找一种能够验证RT-PCR检测结果的可靠诊断方法至关重要。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在COVID-19诊断中的应用已被证明是有益的。因此,本研究在几种分类器的帮助下,将临床标志物用于COVID-19的诊断。此外,五种不同的可解释的人工智能技术被用来解释预测。在所有算法中,k近邻算法的准确率、精密度、召回率和f1得分分别为84%、85%、84%和84%,表现最好。本研究发现,结合嗜酸性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、红细胞和白细胞等临床指标对COVID-19的鉴别具有重要意义。分类器可以与标准RT-PCR程序同步使用,使诊断更加可靠和有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 diagnosis using clinical markers and multiple explainable artificial intelligence approaches: A case study from Ecuador

The COVID-19 pandemic erupted at the beginning of 2020 and proved fatal, causing many casualties worldwide. Immediate and precise screening of affected patients is critical for disease control. COVID-19 is often confused with various other respiratory disorders since the symptoms are similar. As of today, the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is utilized for diagnosing COVID-19. However, this approach is sometimes prone to producing erroneous and false negative results. Hence, finding a reliable diagnostic method that can validate the RT-PCR test results is crucial. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in COVID-19 diagnosis has proven to be beneficial. Hence, clinical markers have been utilized for COVID-19 diagnosis with the help of several classifiers in this study. Further, five different explainable artificial intelligence techniques have been utilized to interpret the predictions. Among all the algorithms, the k-nearest neighbor obtained the best performance with an accuracy, precision, recall and f1-score of 84%, 85%, 84% and 84%. According to this study, the combination of clinical markers such as eosinophils, lymphocytes, red blood cells and leukocytes was significant in differentiating COVID-19. The classifiers can be utilized synchronously with the standard RT-PCR procedure making diagnosis more reliable and efficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SLAS Technology
SLAS Technology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
106 days
期刊介绍: SLAS Technology emphasizes scientific and technical advances that enable and improve life sciences research and development; drug-delivery; diagnostics; biomedical and molecular imaging; and personalized and precision medicine. This includes high-throughput and other laboratory automation technologies; micro/nanotechnologies; analytical, separation and quantitative techniques; synthetic chemistry and biology; informatics (data analysis, statistics, bio, genomic and chemoinformatics); and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信