体外碎石术是目前治疗泌尿结石的一线疗法吗?

C. Minguez Ojeda, I. Laso García, D. López Curtis, G. Duque Ruiz, M. Mata Alcaraz, M. Santiago González, A. Artiles Medina, M. Hevia Palacios, F. Arias Fúnez, F.J. Burgos Revilla
{"title":"体外碎石术是目前治疗泌尿结石的一线疗法吗?","authors":"C. Minguez Ojeda,&nbsp;I. Laso García,&nbsp;D. López Curtis,&nbsp;G. Duque Ruiz,&nbsp;M. Mata Alcaraz,&nbsp;M. Santiago González,&nbsp;A. Artiles Medina,&nbsp;M. Hevia Palacios,&nbsp;F. Arias Fúnez,&nbsp;F.J. Burgos Revilla","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and </span>ureteral stones</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate </span>logistic regression<span> of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5<!--> <span>mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.13; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.15; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.052) and number of waves (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.131; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), number of waves (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.000; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), energy (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.005; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.571).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?\",\"authors\":\"C. Minguez Ojeda,&nbsp;I. Laso García,&nbsp;D. López Curtis,&nbsp;G. Duque Ruiz,&nbsp;M. Mata Alcaraz,&nbsp;M. Santiago González,&nbsp;A. Artiles Medina,&nbsp;M. Hevia Palacios,&nbsp;F. Arias Fúnez,&nbsp;F.J. Burgos Revilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and </span>ureteral stones</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate </span>logistic regression<span> of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5<!--> <span>mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.13; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.15; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.052) and number of waves (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.131; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), number of waves (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.000; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), energy (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.005; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.571).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217357862300104X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217357862300104X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评价体外碎石(SWL)作为肾结石和输尿管结石一线治疗方法的疗效和并发症。方法 对 2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在一家三级中心接受碎石治疗的所有患者进行回顾性观察研究,回顾患者特征、结石、并发症和 SWL 治疗结果。对结石缩小的相关因素进行了多变量逻辑回归。此外,还对SWL术后追加治疗的相关因素以及并发症的相关因素进行了统计分析。结石平均大小为 9.5 毫米。1540例(89.4%)患者的结石缩小。在多变量分析中,结石大小(OR = 1.13;P = 0.00)、碎石的输尿管位置(OR = 1.15;P = 0.052)和 SWL 使用的波数(P = 0.002;OR = 1.00)是与结石缩小相关的因素。有 665 名患者(38.5%)在碎石后需要再次治疗。结石大小(OR = 1.131;P = 0.000)、碎石波数(OR = 1.000;P = 0.000)、能量(OR = 1.005;P = 0.000)是需要再次治疗的相关因素。153名患者(8.8%)在SWL术后出现并发症。结论碎石术仍是治疗输尿管结石的一线疗法,且并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones

Methods

Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.

Results

1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR = 1.13; p = 0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR = 1.15; p = 0.052) and number of waves (p = 0.002; OR = 1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR = 1.131; p = 0.000), number of waves (OR = 1.000; p = 0.000), energy (OR = 1.005; p = 0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p = 0.024, OR = 1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P = 0.004, OR = 0.571).

Conclusion

Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信