用脚踏惯性测量装置测量团队体育活动中的速度的并发有效性和装置间可靠性。

Science & medicine in football Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493
Naomi Myhill, Dan Weaving, Mark Robinson, Steve Barrett, Stacey Emmonds
{"title":"用脚踏惯性测量装置测量团队体育活动中的速度的并发有效性和装置间可靠性。","authors":"Naomi Myhill, Dan Weaving, Mark Robinson, Steve Barrett, Stacey Emmonds","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (F-IMU) was investigated during linear and change of direction running drills. Sixteen individuals performed four repetitions of two drills (maximal acceleration and flying 10 m sprint) and five repetitions of a multi-directional movement protocol. Participants wore two F-IMUs (Playermaker) and 10 retro-reflective markers to allow for comparisons to the criterion system (Qualisys). Validity of the F-IMU derived velocity was assessed via root-mean-square error (RMSE), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). Between-unit reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC) with 90% CI and 95% LoA. The mean difference for instantaneous velocity for all participants and drills combined was -0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>, the LoA were from -1.09 to -1.186 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup> and RMSE was 0.583 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. The ICC ranged from 0.84 to 1, with LoA from -7.412 to 2.924 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Differences were dependent on the reference speed, with the greatest absolute difference (-0.66 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>) found at velocities above 7 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Between-unit reliability of the F-IMU ranges from good to excellent for all locomotor characteristics. Playermaker has good agreement with 3D motion capture for velocity and good to excellent between-unit reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"308-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit to measure velocity during team sport activity.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Myhill, Dan Weaving, Mark Robinson, Steve Barrett, Stacey Emmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (F-IMU) was investigated during linear and change of direction running drills. Sixteen individuals performed four repetitions of two drills (maximal acceleration and flying 10 m sprint) and five repetitions of a multi-directional movement protocol. Participants wore two F-IMUs (Playermaker) and 10 retro-reflective markers to allow for comparisons to the criterion system (Qualisys). Validity of the F-IMU derived velocity was assessed via root-mean-square error (RMSE), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). Between-unit reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC) with 90% CI and 95% LoA. The mean difference for instantaneous velocity for all participants and drills combined was -0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>, the LoA were from -1.09 to -1.186 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup> and RMSE was 0.583 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. The ICC ranged from 0.84 to 1, with LoA from -7.412 to 2.924 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Differences were dependent on the reference speed, with the greatest absolute difference (-0.66 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>) found at velocities above 7 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Between-unit reliability of the F-IMU ranges from good to excellent for all locomotor characteristics. Playermaker has good agreement with 3D motion capture for velocity and good to excellent between-unit reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"308-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在直线跑和变向跑训练中,研究了脚载惯性测量单元(F-IMU)的并发有效性和单元间可靠性。16 人进行了四次重复的两种练习(最大加速度和 10 米短跑)和五次重复的多方向运动练习。参与者佩戴了两个 F-IMU(Playermaker)和 10 个反向反射标记,以便与标准系统(Qualisys)进行比较。通过均方根误差 (RMSE)、95% 一致性限值 (LoA) 和带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的平均差来评估 F-IMU 得出的速度的有效性。单位间的可靠性通过带 90% 置信区间和 95% LoA 的类内相关性 (ICC) 进行评估。所有参与者和训练的瞬时速度平均差为-0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s-1,LoA 为-1.09 至 -1.186 m ∙ s-1,RMSE 为 0.583 m ∙ s-1。ICC 为 0.84 至 1,LoA 为 -7.412 至 2.924 m∙ s-1。差异取决于参考速度,速度超过 7 m ∙ s-1 时绝对差异最大(-0.66 m ∙ s-1)。对于所有运动特征,F-IMU 的单位间可靠性从良好到优秀不等。在速度方面,Playermaker 与三维运动捕捉具有良好的一致性,而在单位间可靠性方面则从良好到优秀不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit to measure velocity during team sport activity.

The concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (F-IMU) was investigated during linear and change of direction running drills. Sixteen individuals performed four repetitions of two drills (maximal acceleration and flying 10 m sprint) and five repetitions of a multi-directional movement protocol. Participants wore two F-IMUs (Playermaker) and 10 retro-reflective markers to allow for comparisons to the criterion system (Qualisys). Validity of the F-IMU derived velocity was assessed via root-mean-square error (RMSE), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). Between-unit reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC) with 90% CI and 95% LoA. The mean difference for instantaneous velocity for all participants and drills combined was -0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s-1, the LoA were from -1.09 to -1.186 m ∙ s-1 and RMSE was 0.583 m ∙ s-1. The ICC ranged from 0.84 to 1, with LoA from -7.412 to 2.924 m ∙ s-1. Differences were dependent on the reference speed, with the greatest absolute difference (-0.66 m ∙ s-1) found at velocities above 7 m ∙ s-1. Between-unit reliability of the F-IMU ranges from good to excellent for all locomotor characteristics. Playermaker has good agreement with 3D motion capture for velocity and good to excellent between-unit reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信