第八章。在高通量测序基因测试中宣布或不宣布主动发现的异常?

Myriam Guedj, Marion Rosier, Patrick Calvas, Sophie Julia, Christelle Garnier, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre
{"title":"第八章。在高通量测序基因测试中宣布或不宣布主动发现的异常?","authors":"Myriam Guedj,&nbsp;Marion Rosier,&nbsp;Patrick Calvas,&nbsp;Sophie Julia,&nbsp;Christelle Garnier,&nbsp;Anne Cambon-Thomsen,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre","doi":"10.3917/jibes.342.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>New genome sequencing techniques allow new approaches in medical genetics, in particular by facilitating the diagnosis of genetic diseases. However, their use also leads to unsolicited genetic findings being uncovered. This type of discovery raises ethical, legal and psychological considerations. The objective of this psychological research was to study the different positions of patients, health professionals and general public regarding the acceptability of the announcement of unsolicited findings revealed during a high-throughput sequencing genetic test.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>the first exploratory study aimed, through non-directive research interviews conducted with 13 patients of a medical genetics service, to understand the psychological repercussions linked to the announcement of a result of a targeted genetic test and to know the patients&#8217; desires regarding the announcement of unsolicited findings if the test had been a high-throughput genetic test. The second study, using a quantitative methodology, aimed to identify the judgment policies of 144 patients, 94 healthcare professionals and 211 people from the general public concerning the acceptability of this type of disclosure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analyses highlighted six judgment policies as to whether or not to disclose the discovery of unsolicited anomalies: &#8220;Tell everything&#8221;, &#8220;Tell even in part&#8221;, &#8220;Tell everything unless desperate&#8221;, &#8220;Undecided&#8221;, &#8220;Do not tell&#8221; and &#8220;Do not tell if no prevention&#8221;. The participants positioned themselves differently, in particular according to the patient&#8217;s consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research shows the variability of positioning and the importance of consent in the acceptability of the disclosure of unsolicited findings. However, one of the limitations of the study lies in the fact that in medical clinic, acceptability and acceptance may vary over time. A longitudinal study would undoubtedly afford a better understanding of the psychological progress of patients in this type of care pathway..</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapitre 8. Annoncer ou pas la découverte d’anomalies non sollicitées lors d’un test génétique à séquençage haut débit ?\",\"authors\":\"Myriam Guedj,&nbsp;Marion Rosier,&nbsp;Patrick Calvas,&nbsp;Sophie Julia,&nbsp;Christelle Garnier,&nbsp;Anne Cambon-Thomsen,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/jibes.342.0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>New genome sequencing techniques allow new approaches in medical genetics, in particular by facilitating the diagnosis of genetic diseases. However, their use also leads to unsolicited genetic findings being uncovered. This type of discovery raises ethical, legal and psychological considerations. The objective of this psychological research was to study the different positions of patients, health professionals and general public regarding the acceptability of the announcement of unsolicited findings revealed during a high-throughput sequencing genetic test.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>the first exploratory study aimed, through non-directive research interviews conducted with 13 patients of a medical genetics service, to understand the psychological repercussions linked to the announcement of a result of a targeted genetic test and to know the patients&#8217; desires regarding the announcement of unsolicited findings if the test had been a high-throughput genetic test. The second study, using a quantitative methodology, aimed to identify the judgment policies of 144 patients, 94 healthcare professionals and 211 people from the general public concerning the acceptability of this type of disclosure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analyses highlighted six judgment policies as to whether or not to disclose the discovery of unsolicited anomalies: &#8220;Tell everything&#8221;, &#8220;Tell even in part&#8221;, &#8220;Tell everything unless desperate&#8221;, &#8220;Undecided&#8221;, &#8220;Do not tell&#8221; and &#8220;Do not tell if no prevention&#8221;. The participants positioned themselves differently, in particular according to the patient&#8217;s consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research shows the variability of positioning and the importance of consent in the acceptability of the disclosure of unsolicited findings. However, one of the limitations of the study lies in the fact that in medical clinic, acceptability and acceptance may vary over time. A longitudinal study would undoubtedly afford a better understanding of the psychological progress of patients in this type of care pathway..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.342.0121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.342.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新的基因组测序技术为医学遗传学提供了新的途径,特别是通过促进遗传疾病的诊断。然而,它们的使用也会导致未经请求的基因发现被发现。这种类型的发现引起了伦理、法律和心理方面的考虑。这项心理研究的目的是研究患者、卫生专业人员和一般公众对高通量测序基因测试期间公布未经请求的结果的可接受性的不同立场。方法:第一项探索性研究旨在通过对医学遗传学服务的13名患者进行非指导性研究访谈,了解与宣布目标基因检测结果相关的心理影响并了解患者;如果检测是一种高通量基因检测,关于宣布未经请求的发现的愿望。第二项研究使用定量方法,旨在确定144名患者、94名医疗保健专业人员和211名公众对这类披露的可接受性的判断政策。结果:聚类分析突出了关于是否披露发现的主动异常的六种判断策略:“Tell everything” “即使部分地告诉”“告诉一切,除非绝望”“未决定”“和“不要告诉如果没有预防”。参与者对自己的定位不同,特别是根据患者的同意。结论:本研究显示了定位的可变性和同意在非自愿发现披露的可接受性中的重要性。然而,本研究的局限性之一在于,在医学临床中,可接受性和接受度可能会随着时间的推移而变化。纵向研究无疑可以更好地了解患者在这类护理途径中的心理进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapitre 8. Annoncer ou pas la découverte d’anomalies non sollicitées lors d’un test génétique à séquençage haut débit ?

Objective: New genome sequencing techniques allow new approaches in medical genetics, in particular by facilitating the diagnosis of genetic diseases. However, their use also leads to unsolicited genetic findings being uncovered. This type of discovery raises ethical, legal and psychological considerations. The objective of this psychological research was to study the different positions of patients, health professionals and general public regarding the acceptability of the announcement of unsolicited findings revealed during a high-throughput sequencing genetic test.

Method: the first exploratory study aimed, through non-directive research interviews conducted with 13 patients of a medical genetics service, to understand the psychological repercussions linked to the announcement of a result of a targeted genetic test and to know the patients’ desires regarding the announcement of unsolicited findings if the test had been a high-throughput genetic test. The second study, using a quantitative methodology, aimed to identify the judgment policies of 144 patients, 94 healthcare professionals and 211 people from the general public concerning the acceptability of this type of disclosure.

Results: The cluster analyses highlighted six judgment policies as to whether or not to disclose the discovery of unsolicited anomalies: “Tell everything”, “Tell even in part”, “Tell everything unless desperate”, “Undecided”, “Do not tell” and “Do not tell if no prevention”. The participants positioned themselves differently, in particular according to the patient’s consent.

Conclusion: This research shows the variability of positioning and the importance of consent in the acceptability of the disclosure of unsolicited findings. However, one of the limitations of the study lies in the fact that in medical clinic, acceptability and acceptance may vary over time. A longitudinal study would undoubtedly afford a better understanding of the psychological progress of patients in this type of care pathway..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信