比较体外冲击波和高压氧治疗促进链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病啮齿动物模型伤口愈合的效果。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1002/kjm2.12746
Rong-Fu Chen, Yun-Nan Lin, Keng-Fan Liu, Chia-Chun Lee, Chieh-Ju Hu, Chun-Ting Wang, Ching-Jen Wang, Yur-Ren Kuo
{"title":"比较体外冲击波和高压氧治疗促进链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病啮齿动物模型伤口愈合的效果。","authors":"Rong-Fu Chen, Yun-Nan Lin, Keng-Fan Liu, Chia-Chun Lee, Chieh-Ju Hu, Chun-Ting Wang, Ching-Jen Wang, Yur-Ren Kuo","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.12746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have revealed that both extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and HBOT in enhancing diabetic wound healing. A dorsal skin defect in a streptozotocin-induced diabetes rodent model was used. Postoperative wound healing was assessed once every 3 days. Histologic examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Proliferation marker protein Ki-67 (Ki-67), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) were evaluated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The wound area was significantly reduced in the ESWT and HBOT groups compared to that in the diabetic controls. However, the wound healing time was significantly increased in the HBOT group compared to the ESWT group. Histological findings showed a statistical increase in neovascularization and suppression of the inflammatory response by both HBOT and ESWT compared to the controls. IHC staining revealed a significant increase in Ki-67, VEGF, and eNOS but suppressed 8-OHdG expression in the ESWT group compared to the HBOT group. ESWT facilitated diabetic wound healing more effectively than HBOT by suppressing the inflammatory response and enhancing cellular proliferation and neovascularization and tissue regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":49946,"journal":{"name":"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1135-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave and hyperbaric oxygen therapy on enhancing wound healing in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rodent model.\",\"authors\":\"Rong-Fu Chen, Yun-Nan Lin, Keng-Fan Liu, Chia-Chun Lee, Chieh-Ju Hu, Chun-Ting Wang, Ching-Jen Wang, Yur-Ren Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kjm2.12746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies have revealed that both extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and HBOT in enhancing diabetic wound healing. A dorsal skin defect in a streptozotocin-induced diabetes rodent model was used. Postoperative wound healing was assessed once every 3 days. Histologic examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Proliferation marker protein Ki-67 (Ki-67), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) were evaluated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The wound area was significantly reduced in the ESWT and HBOT groups compared to that in the diabetic controls. However, the wound healing time was significantly increased in the HBOT group compared to the ESWT group. Histological findings showed a statistical increase in neovascularization and suppression of the inflammatory response by both HBOT and ESWT compared to the controls. IHC staining revealed a significant increase in Ki-67, VEGF, and eNOS but suppressed 8-OHdG expression in the ESWT group compared to the HBOT group. ESWT facilitated diabetic wound healing more effectively than HBOT by suppressing the inflammatory response and enhancing cellular proliferation and neovascularization and tissue regeneration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1135-1144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12746\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究表明,体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)和高压氧治疗(HBOT)都可以加速伤口愈合。本研究旨在比较ESWT和HBOT在促进糖尿病伤口愈合方面的有效性。使用链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病啮齿动物模型的背部皮肤缺损。术后伤口愈合情况每3次评估一次 天。组织学检查采用苏木精和伊红染色。用免疫组织化学(IHC)染色评估增殖标记蛋白Ki-67(Ki-67)、内皮一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和8-羟基-2-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)。与糖尿病对照组相比,ESWT和HBOT组的伤口面积显著减少。然而,与ESWT组相比,HBOT组的伤口愈合时间显著增加。组织学结果显示,与对照组相比,HBOT和ESWT对新生血管形成和炎症反应的抑制均有统计学增加。IHC染色显示,与HBOT组相比,ESWT组的Ki-67、VEGF和eNOS显著增加,但抑制了8-OHdG的表达。ESWT通过抑制炎症反应、增强细胞增殖、新生血管形成和组织再生,比HBOT更有效地促进糖尿病伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave and hyperbaric oxygen therapy on enhancing wound healing in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rodent model.

Studies have revealed that both extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and HBOT in enhancing diabetic wound healing. A dorsal skin defect in a streptozotocin-induced diabetes rodent model was used. Postoperative wound healing was assessed once every 3 days. Histologic examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Proliferation marker protein Ki-67 (Ki-67), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) were evaluated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The wound area was significantly reduced in the ESWT and HBOT groups compared to that in the diabetic controls. However, the wound healing time was significantly increased in the HBOT group compared to the ESWT group. Histological findings showed a statistical increase in neovascularization and suppression of the inflammatory response by both HBOT and ESWT compared to the controls. IHC staining revealed a significant increase in Ki-67, VEGF, and eNOS but suppressed 8-OHdG expression in the ESWT group compared to the HBOT group. ESWT facilitated diabetic wound healing more effectively than HBOT by suppressing the inflammatory response and enhancing cellular proliferation and neovascularization and tissue regeneration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences (KJMS), is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan. The journal was launched in 1985 to promote clinical and scientific research in the medical sciences in Taiwan, and to disseminate this research to the international community. It is published monthly by Wiley. KJMS aims to publish original research and review papers in all fields of medicine and related disciplines that are of topical interest to the medical profession. Authors are welcome to submit Perspectives, reviews, original articles, short communications, Correspondence and letters to the editor for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信