急性脑损伤患者的颅内压监测:何时,如何监测,应该监测什么。

Q3 Medicine
Youngbo Shim, Jungook Kim, Hye Seon Kim, Jiwoong Oh, Seungioo Lee, Eun Jin Ha
{"title":"急性脑损伤患者的颅内压监测:何时,如何监测,应该监测什么。","authors":"Youngbo Shim,&nbsp;Jungook Kim,&nbsp;Hye Seon Kim,&nbsp;Jiwoong Oh,&nbsp;Seungioo Lee,&nbsp;Eun Jin Ha","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there is no level I recommendation for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, it is typically indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 (class II). Even for moderate TBI patients with GCS 9-12, ICP monitoring should be considered for risk of increased ICP. The impact of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes is still not well-established, but recent studies reported a reduction of early mortality (class III) in TBI patients. There is no standard protocol for the application of ICP monitoring. In cases where cerebrospinal fluid drainage is required, an external ventricular drain is commonly used. In other cases, parenchymal ICP monitoring devices are generally employed. Subdural or non-invasive forms are not suitable for ICP monitoring. The mean value of ICP is the parameter recommended for observation in many guidelines. In TBI, values above 22 mmHg are associated with increased mortality. However, recent studies proposed various parameters including cumulative time with ICP above 20 mmHg (pressure-time dose), pressure reactivity index, ICP waveform characteristics (pulse amplitude of ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude), and the compensatory reserve of the brain (reserve-amplitude-pressure), which are useful in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment. Further research is required for validation of these parameters compared to simple ICP monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"19 2","pages":"149-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/e6/kjn-19-149.PMC10329885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.\",\"authors\":\"Youngbo Shim,&nbsp;Jungook Kim,&nbsp;Hye Seon Kim,&nbsp;Jiwoong Oh,&nbsp;Seungioo Lee,&nbsp;Eun Jin Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While there is no level I recommendation for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, it is typically indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 (class II). Even for moderate TBI patients with GCS 9-12, ICP monitoring should be considered for risk of increased ICP. The impact of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes is still not well-established, but recent studies reported a reduction of early mortality (class III) in TBI patients. There is no standard protocol for the application of ICP monitoring. In cases where cerebrospinal fluid drainage is required, an external ventricular drain is commonly used. In other cases, parenchymal ICP monitoring devices are generally employed. Subdural or non-invasive forms are not suitable for ICP monitoring. The mean value of ICP is the parameter recommended for observation in many guidelines. In TBI, values above 22 mmHg are associated with increased mortality. However, recent studies proposed various parameters including cumulative time with ICP above 20 mmHg (pressure-time dose), pressure reactivity index, ICP waveform characteristics (pulse amplitude of ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude), and the compensatory reserve of the brain (reserve-amplitude-pressure), which are useful in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment. Further research is required for validation of these parameters compared to simple ICP monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"149-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/e6/kjn-19-149.PMC10329885.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然颅内压(ICP)监测没有一级推荐,但它通常适用于格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为3-8 (II类)的严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者。即使是GCS评分为9-12的中度TBI患者,也应考虑颅内压升高的风险。ICP监测对患者预后的影响尚不明确,但最近的研究报道了TBI患者早期死亡率(III级)的降低。目前还没有适用于ICP监测的标准方案。在需要脑脊液引流的情况下,通常使用脑室外引流。在其他情况下,通常采用实质ICP监测装置。硬膜下或无创形式不适合监测ICP。在许多指南中,ICP的平均值是推荐用于观察的参数。在脑外伤中,高于22毫米汞柱与死亡率增加有关。然而,最近的研究提出了各种参数,包括ICP高于20mmhg的累积时间(压力-时间剂量)、压力反应性指数、ICP波形特征(ICP脉冲幅度、平均ICP波幅)和脑代偿储备(储备-振幅-压力),这些参数对预测患者预后和指导治疗有用。与简单的ICP监测相比,需要进一步的研究来验证这些参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.

While there is no level I recommendation for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, it is typically indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 (class II). Even for moderate TBI patients with GCS 9-12, ICP monitoring should be considered for risk of increased ICP. The impact of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes is still not well-established, but recent studies reported a reduction of early mortality (class III) in TBI patients. There is no standard protocol for the application of ICP monitoring. In cases where cerebrospinal fluid drainage is required, an external ventricular drain is commonly used. In other cases, parenchymal ICP monitoring devices are generally employed. Subdural or non-invasive forms are not suitable for ICP monitoring. The mean value of ICP is the parameter recommended for observation in many guidelines. In TBI, values above 22 mmHg are associated with increased mortality. However, recent studies proposed various parameters including cumulative time with ICP above 20 mmHg (pressure-time dose), pressure reactivity index, ICP waveform characteristics (pulse amplitude of ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude), and the compensatory reserve of the brain (reserve-amplitude-pressure), which are useful in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment. Further research is required for validation of these parameters compared to simple ICP monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信