量化睡眠:自我追踪技术与 21 世纪主观性的重塑》(Self-Tracking Technologies and the Reshaping of 21st-Century Subjectivity)。

Diletta De Cristofaro, Simona Chiodo
{"title":"量化睡眠:自我追踪技术与 21 世纪主观性的重塑》(Self-Tracking Technologies and the Reshaping of 21st-Century Subjectivity)。","authors":"Diletta De Cristofaro, Simona Chiodo","doi":"10.12759/hsr.48.2023.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Taking sleep-tracking as its case study, this article seeks to theorise the understandings of the self that are at stake in the the Quantified Self (QS) movement and everyday self-tracking practices by bringing together a cultural theorist's and a philosopher's perspectives. We situate the rise of sleep-tracking practices within the sleep crisis discourse, namely, the sense that in today's society sleep disorders are on the rise and sleep deprivation is rife. Through analyses of self-trackers' blogs about sleep, sleep-tracking technologies' marketing information, and the functionalities of these devices and apps, we argue that the drive to self-improve at the heart of self- and sleep-tracking props up an understanding of the self centred around achievement. This understanding ends up devaluing sleep and risks contributing to the sleep crisis. We show how these paradoxes can be further understood from an epistemological perspective. Self- and sleep-tracking are arguably practices that seek to obtain knowledge by trading referential expert knowledge for self-referential nonexpert knowledge and that strive for self-optimisation by self-sabotaging achievement subjectivity. We conclude that the use of self-tracking technologies magnifies what is essentially a crisis of subjectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73243,"journal":{"name":"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research","volume":"48 2","pages":"176-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantified Sleep: Self-Tracking Technologies and the Reshaping of 21<sup>st</sup>-Century Subjectivity.\",\"authors\":\"Diletta De Cristofaro, Simona Chiodo\",\"doi\":\"10.12759/hsr.48.2023.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Taking sleep-tracking as its case study, this article seeks to theorise the understandings of the self that are at stake in the the Quantified Self (QS) movement and everyday self-tracking practices by bringing together a cultural theorist's and a philosopher's perspectives. We situate the rise of sleep-tracking practices within the sleep crisis discourse, namely, the sense that in today's society sleep disorders are on the rise and sleep deprivation is rife. Through analyses of self-trackers' blogs about sleep, sleep-tracking technologies' marketing information, and the functionalities of these devices and apps, we argue that the drive to self-improve at the heart of self- and sleep-tracking props up an understanding of the self centred around achievement. This understanding ends up devaluing sleep and risks contributing to the sleep crisis. We show how these paradoxes can be further understood from an epistemological perspective. Self- and sleep-tracking are arguably practices that seek to obtain knowledge by trading referential expert knowledge for self-referential nonexpert knowledge and that strive for self-optimisation by self-sabotaging achievement subjectivity. We conclude that the use of self-tracking technologies magnifies what is essentially a crisis of subjectivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"176-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.48.2023.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.48.2023.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以睡眠追踪为案例,试图从文化理论家和哲学家的视角,从理论上阐述量化自我(QS)运动和日常自我追踪实践中对自我的理解。我们将睡眠追踪实践的兴起归因于睡眠危机的论述,即当今社会睡眠障碍正在增加,睡眠剥夺现象十分普遍。通过分析自我追踪者关于睡眠的博客、睡眠追踪技术的营销信息以及这些设备和应用程序的功能,我们认为,自我改善的动力是自我追踪和睡眠追踪的核心,它支持一种以成就为中心的自我理解。这种认识最终会贬低睡眠的价值,并有可能导致睡眠危机。我们将展示如何从认识论的角度进一步理解这些悖论。可以说,自我追踪和睡眠追踪都是通过将专家参考性知识换成自我参考性非专家知识来获取知识的做法,也是通过自我破坏成就主观性来努力实现自我优化的做法。我们的结论是,自我跟踪技术的使用放大了本质上的主观性危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantified Sleep: Self-Tracking Technologies and the Reshaping of 21st-Century Subjectivity.

Taking sleep-tracking as its case study, this article seeks to theorise the understandings of the self that are at stake in the the Quantified Self (QS) movement and everyday self-tracking practices by bringing together a cultural theorist's and a philosopher's perspectives. We situate the rise of sleep-tracking practices within the sleep crisis discourse, namely, the sense that in today's society sleep disorders are on the rise and sleep deprivation is rife. Through analyses of self-trackers' blogs about sleep, sleep-tracking technologies' marketing information, and the functionalities of these devices and apps, we argue that the drive to self-improve at the heart of self- and sleep-tracking props up an understanding of the self centred around achievement. This understanding ends up devaluing sleep and risks contributing to the sleep crisis. We show how these paradoxes can be further understood from an epistemological perspective. Self- and sleep-tracking are arguably practices that seek to obtain knowledge by trading referential expert knowledge for self-referential nonexpert knowledge and that strive for self-optimisation by self-sabotaging achievement subjectivity. We conclude that the use of self-tracking technologies magnifies what is essentially a crisis of subjectivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信