Wellington Fernandes da Silva , Fernanda Rodrigues Mendes , Raphael da Costa Bandeira de Melo , Elvira Deolinda Rodrigues Pereira Velloso , Vanderson Rocha , Eduardo Magalhaes Rego
{"title":"在急性髓性白血病缓解诱导过程中评估预防性anidulafungin的影响-倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Wellington Fernandes da Silva , Fernanda Rodrigues Mendes , Raphael da Costa Bandeira de Melo , Elvira Deolinda Rodrigues Pereira Velloso , Vanderson Rocha , Eduardo Magalhaes Rego","doi":"10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Invasive fungal infection<span> (IFI) accounts for substantial morbidity during the treatment of </span></span>acute myeloid leukemia<span> (AML) in adults. Antifungal prophylaxis (AP) is needed during intensive chemotherapy, and </span></span>posaconazole<span><span> is not widely available. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during intensive AML </span>remission induction.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort encompassing newly diagnosed AML adult patients. All subjects received intensive chemotherapy and were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive any AP and patients who received fluconazole (150–400 mg/day) or anidulafungin (100 mg/day).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>During AML induction, 82 patients did not receive AP, 108 and 14 patients received anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. IFI incidence was 27%, classified as possible, probable, and proven in 65, 2 and 33%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that lower neutrophil<span> counts are associated with IFI (OR = 2.8), whereas age, genetic classification, and lymphocyte counts were not. To examine the impact of anidulafungin in comparison with ‘no AP’, a </span></span>propensity score matching<span> analysis was performed. Use of anidulafungin was not related to less IFI during induction, while neutrophil counts remained significant. Patients under prophylactic anidulafungin received less amphotericin B (</span></span><em>p</em><span> < 0.001) but not voriconazole (</span><em>p</em> = 0.49).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of anidulafungin during AML induction. Here, the incidence of mold infections did not decrease with AP, suggesting that in a setting with a high incidence of IFI, broad spectrum AP might be more suitable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14824,"journal":{"name":"Journal de mycologie medicale","volume":"33 4","pages":"Article 101434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia – A propensity-score matching analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wellington Fernandes da Silva , Fernanda Rodrigues Mendes , Raphael da Costa Bandeira de Melo , Elvira Deolinda Rodrigues Pereira Velloso , Vanderson Rocha , Eduardo Magalhaes Rego\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Invasive fungal infection<span> (IFI) accounts for substantial morbidity during the treatment of </span></span>acute myeloid leukemia<span> (AML) in adults. Antifungal prophylaxis (AP) is needed during intensive chemotherapy, and </span></span>posaconazole<span><span> is not widely available. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during intensive AML </span>remission induction.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort encompassing newly diagnosed AML adult patients. All subjects received intensive chemotherapy and were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive any AP and patients who received fluconazole (150–400 mg/day) or anidulafungin (100 mg/day).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>During AML induction, 82 patients did not receive AP, 108 and 14 patients received anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. IFI incidence was 27%, classified as possible, probable, and proven in 65, 2 and 33%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that lower neutrophil<span> counts are associated with IFI (OR = 2.8), whereas age, genetic classification, and lymphocyte counts were not. To examine the impact of anidulafungin in comparison with ‘no AP’, a </span></span>propensity score matching<span> analysis was performed. Use of anidulafungin was not related to less IFI during induction, while neutrophil counts remained significant. Patients under prophylactic anidulafungin received less amphotericin B (</span></span><em>p</em><span> < 0.001) but not voriconazole (</span><em>p</em> = 0.49).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of anidulafungin during AML induction. Here, the incidence of mold infections did not decrease with AP, suggesting that in a setting with a high incidence of IFI, broad spectrum AP might be more suitable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de mycologie medicale\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de mycologie medicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1156523323000781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de mycologie medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1156523323000781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia – A propensity-score matching analysis
Introduction
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) accounts for substantial morbidity during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults. Antifungal prophylaxis (AP) is needed during intensive chemotherapy, and posaconazole is not widely available. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of prophylactic anidulafungin during intensive AML remission induction.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort encompassing newly diagnosed AML adult patients. All subjects received intensive chemotherapy and were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive any AP and patients who received fluconazole (150–400 mg/day) or anidulafungin (100 mg/day).
Results
During AML induction, 82 patients did not receive AP, 108 and 14 patients received anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. IFI incidence was 27%, classified as possible, probable, and proven in 65, 2 and 33%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that lower neutrophil counts are associated with IFI (OR = 2.8), whereas age, genetic classification, and lymphocyte counts were not. To examine the impact of anidulafungin in comparison with ‘no AP’, a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Use of anidulafungin was not related to less IFI during induction, while neutrophil counts remained significant. Patients under prophylactic anidulafungin received less amphotericin B (p < 0.001) but not voriconazole (p = 0.49).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the role of anidulafungin during AML induction. Here, the incidence of mold infections did not decrease with AP, suggesting that in a setting with a high incidence of IFI, broad spectrum AP might be more suitable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal de Mycologie Medicale / Journal of Medical Mycology (JMM) publishes in English works dealing with human and animal mycology. The subjects treated are focused in particular on clinical, diagnostic, epidemiological, immunological, medical, pathological, preventive or therapeutic aspects of mycoses. Also covered are basic aspects linked primarily with morphology (electronic and photonic microscopy), physiology, biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology, immunochemistry, genetics, taxonomy or phylogeny of pathogenic or opportunistic fungi and actinomycetes in humans or animals. Studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi cannot be considered without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.
JMM publishes (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews (and minireviews), case reports, technical notes, letters to the editor and information. Only clinical cases with real originality (new species, new clinical present action, new geographical localization, etc.), and fully documented (identification methods, results, etc.), will be considered.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.