Moira C McNulty, Jared Kerman, Samantha A Devlin, Maria Pyra, Laura Rusie, Kate Curoe, Liz Thompson, Joseph A Mason, Eleanor E Friedman, A Ziggy Uvin, C Hendricks Brown, John Schneider, Rupa Patel
{"title":"美国中西部艾滋病高发地区的 PrEP 持续支持和监测。","authors":"Moira C McNulty, Jared Kerman, Samantha A Devlin, Maria Pyra, Laura Rusie, Kate Curoe, Liz Thompson, Joseph A Mason, Eleanor E Friedman, A Ziggy Uvin, C Hendricks Brown, John Schneider, Rupa Patel","doi":"10.1521/aeap.2023.35.3.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) metrics can guide service delivery yet does not occur routinely. We developed a survey to understand current practices for monitoring PrEP at PrEP-providing organizations in Illinois and Missouri. The survey was distributed from September through November 2020; 26 organizations participated. Most respondents indicated ongoing efforts to screen for PrEP eligibility (66.7%), link to care (87.5%), and retain clients in care (70.8%); 70.8% reported collecting data on PrEP initiation, 41.7% on retention in care, and 37.5% on missed visits. Barriers to monitoring PrEP metrics included lack of IT support (69.6%), manual processes (69.6%), and lack of staff resources (65.2%). Most respondents offered clients support for PrEP retention and adherence and wanted to expand interventions for PrEP persistence, yet fewer monitored corresponding metrics. To enhance PrEP implementation, organizations should improve monitoring and evaluation of PrEP metrics along the entire continuum and respond with appropriate services to support clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47801,"journal":{"name":"Aids Education and Prevention","volume":"35 3","pages":"235-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328557/pdf/nihms-1911435.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PrEP Persistence Support and Monitoring in Areas of High HIV Burden in the Midwestern United States.\",\"authors\":\"Moira C McNulty, Jared Kerman, Samantha A Devlin, Maria Pyra, Laura Rusie, Kate Curoe, Liz Thompson, Joseph A Mason, Eleanor E Friedman, A Ziggy Uvin, C Hendricks Brown, John Schneider, Rupa Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/aeap.2023.35.3.235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) metrics can guide service delivery yet does not occur routinely. We developed a survey to understand current practices for monitoring PrEP at PrEP-providing organizations in Illinois and Missouri. The survey was distributed from September through November 2020; 26 organizations participated. Most respondents indicated ongoing efforts to screen for PrEP eligibility (66.7%), link to care (87.5%), and retain clients in care (70.8%); 70.8% reported collecting data on PrEP initiation, 41.7% on retention in care, and 37.5% on missed visits. Barriers to monitoring PrEP metrics included lack of IT support (69.6%), manual processes (69.6%), and lack of staff resources (65.2%). Most respondents offered clients support for PrEP retention and adherence and wanted to expand interventions for PrEP persistence, yet fewer monitored corresponding metrics. To enhance PrEP implementation, organizations should improve monitoring and evaluation of PrEP metrics along the entire continuum and respond with appropriate services to support clients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aids Education and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"235-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328557/pdf/nihms-1911435.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aids Education and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2023.35.3.235\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Education and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2023.35.3.235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
PrEP Persistence Support and Monitoring in Areas of High HIV Burden in the Midwestern United States.
Monitoring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) metrics can guide service delivery yet does not occur routinely. We developed a survey to understand current practices for monitoring PrEP at PrEP-providing organizations in Illinois and Missouri. The survey was distributed from September through November 2020; 26 organizations participated. Most respondents indicated ongoing efforts to screen for PrEP eligibility (66.7%), link to care (87.5%), and retain clients in care (70.8%); 70.8% reported collecting data on PrEP initiation, 41.7% on retention in care, and 37.5% on missed visits. Barriers to monitoring PrEP metrics included lack of IT support (69.6%), manual processes (69.6%), and lack of staff resources (65.2%). Most respondents offered clients support for PrEP retention and adherence and wanted to expand interventions for PrEP persistence, yet fewer monitored corresponding metrics. To enhance PrEP implementation, organizations should improve monitoring and evaluation of PrEP metrics along the entire continuum and respond with appropriate services to support clients.
期刊介绍:
Presenting state-of-the-art research and information, AIDS Education and Prevention is a vital addition to the library collections of medical schools, hospitals, and other institutions and organizations with HIV/AIDS research programs. The journal integrates public health, psychosocial, sociocultural, and public policy perspectives on issues of key concern nationally and globally.