部分迁徙物种不同迁徙策略的适应性、行为和能量权衡。

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4151
Andrea Soriano-Redondo, Aldina M. A. Franco, Marta Acácio, Ana Payo-Payo, Bruno Herlander Martins, Francisco Moreira, Inês Catry
{"title":"部分迁徙物种不同迁徙策略的适应性、行为和能量权衡。","authors":"Andrea Soriano-Redondo,&nbsp;Aldina M. A. Franco,&nbsp;Marta Acácio,&nbsp;Ana Payo-Payo,&nbsp;Bruno Herlander Martins,&nbsp;Francisco Moreira,&nbsp;Inês Catry","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alternative migratory strategies can coexist within animal populations and species. Anthropogenic impacts can shift the fitness balance between these strategies leading to changes in migratory behaviors. Yet some of the mechanisms that drive such changes remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the phenotypic differences, and the energetic, behavioral, and fitness trade-offs associated with four different movement strategies (long-distance and short-distance migration, and regional and local residency) in a population of white storks (<i>Ciconia ciconia</i>) that has shifted its migratory behavior over the last decades, from fully long-distance migration toward year-round residency. To do this, we tracked 75 adult storks fitted with GPS/GSM loggers with tri-axial acceleration sensors over 5 years, and estimated individual displacement, behavior, and overall dynamic body acceleration, a proxy for activity-related energy expenditure. Additionally, we monitored nesting colonies to assess individual survival and breeding success. We found that long-distance migrants traveled thousands of kilometers more throughout the year, spent more energy, and &gt;10% less time resting compared with short-distance migrants and residents. Long-distance migrants also spent on average more energy per unit of time while foraging, and less energy per unit of time while soaring. Migratory individuals also occupied their nests later than resident ones, later occupation led to later laying dates and a lower number of fledglings. However, we did not find significant differences in survival probability. Finally, we found phenotypic differences in the migratory probability, as smaller sized individuals were more likely to migrate, and they might be incurring higher energetic and fitness costs than larger ones. Our results shed light on the shifting migratory strategies in a partially migratory population and highlight the nuances of anthropogenic impacts on species behavior, fitness, and evolutionary dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"104 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4151","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fitness, behavioral, and energetic trade-offs of different migratory strategies in a partially migratory species\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Soriano-Redondo,&nbsp;Aldina M. A. Franco,&nbsp;Marta Acácio,&nbsp;Ana Payo-Payo,&nbsp;Bruno Herlander Martins,&nbsp;Francisco Moreira,&nbsp;Inês Catry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.4151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Alternative migratory strategies can coexist within animal populations and species. Anthropogenic impacts can shift the fitness balance between these strategies leading to changes in migratory behaviors. Yet some of the mechanisms that drive such changes remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the phenotypic differences, and the energetic, behavioral, and fitness trade-offs associated with four different movement strategies (long-distance and short-distance migration, and regional and local residency) in a population of white storks (<i>Ciconia ciconia</i>) that has shifted its migratory behavior over the last decades, from fully long-distance migration toward year-round residency. To do this, we tracked 75 adult storks fitted with GPS/GSM loggers with tri-axial acceleration sensors over 5 years, and estimated individual displacement, behavior, and overall dynamic body acceleration, a proxy for activity-related energy expenditure. Additionally, we monitored nesting colonies to assess individual survival and breeding success. We found that long-distance migrants traveled thousands of kilometers more throughout the year, spent more energy, and &gt;10% less time resting compared with short-distance migrants and residents. Long-distance migrants also spent on average more energy per unit of time while foraging, and less energy per unit of time while soaring. Migratory individuals also occupied their nests later than resident ones, later occupation led to later laying dates and a lower number of fledglings. However, we did not find significant differences in survival probability. Finally, we found phenotypic differences in the migratory probability, as smaller sized individuals were more likely to migrate, and they might be incurring higher energetic and fitness costs than larger ones. Our results shed light on the shifting migratory strategies in a partially migratory population and highlight the nuances of anthropogenic impacts on species behavior, fitness, and evolutionary dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"104 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4151\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

替代性迁徙策略可以在动物种群和物种中共存。人为影响可以改变这些策略之间的适应度平衡,从而导致迁徙行为的变化。然而,推动这种变化的一些机制仍然鲜为人知。在这里,我们研究了白鹳种群(Ciconia Ciconia)的表型差异,以及与四种不同的运动策略(长距离和短距离迁徙,以及区域和本地居住)相关的能量、行为和适应性权衡,这些白鹳在过去几十年中改变了迁徙行为,从完全长途迁移到全年居住。为了做到这一点,我们追踪了75只成年鹳,它们配备了GPS/GSM记录仪,并配备了超过5个的三轴加速度传感器 年,以及估计的个体位移、行为和整体动态身体加速度,这是与活动相关的能量消耗的代表。此外,我们还监测了筑巢群体,以评估个体的存活率和繁殖成功率。我们发现,与短途移民和居民相比,长途移民全年多旅行数千公里,花费更多的精力,休息时间减少10%以上。长距离迁徙者在觅食时平均每单位时间花费更多的能量,而在飞翔时每单位时间消耗更少的能量。迁徙个体占据巢穴的时间也比常驻个体晚,较晚的占据导致产卵日期较晚,雏鸟数量较少。然而,我们没有发现生存概率的显著差异。最后,我们发现迁徙概率存在表型差异,因为体型较小的个体更有可能迁徙,而且它们可能比体型较大的个体承担更高的能量和健身成本。我们的研究结果揭示了部分迁徙种群中迁徙策略的变化,并强调了人为影响对物种行为、适应度和进化动力学的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fitness, behavioral, and energetic trade-offs of different migratory strategies in a partially migratory species

Fitness, behavioral, and energetic trade-offs of different migratory strategies in a partially migratory species

Alternative migratory strategies can coexist within animal populations and species. Anthropogenic impacts can shift the fitness balance between these strategies leading to changes in migratory behaviors. Yet some of the mechanisms that drive such changes remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the phenotypic differences, and the energetic, behavioral, and fitness trade-offs associated with four different movement strategies (long-distance and short-distance migration, and regional and local residency) in a population of white storks (Ciconia ciconia) that has shifted its migratory behavior over the last decades, from fully long-distance migration toward year-round residency. To do this, we tracked 75 adult storks fitted with GPS/GSM loggers with tri-axial acceleration sensors over 5 years, and estimated individual displacement, behavior, and overall dynamic body acceleration, a proxy for activity-related energy expenditure. Additionally, we monitored nesting colonies to assess individual survival and breeding success. We found that long-distance migrants traveled thousands of kilometers more throughout the year, spent more energy, and >10% less time resting compared with short-distance migrants and residents. Long-distance migrants also spent on average more energy per unit of time while foraging, and less energy per unit of time while soaring. Migratory individuals also occupied their nests later than resident ones, later occupation led to later laying dates and a lower number of fledglings. However, we did not find significant differences in survival probability. Finally, we found phenotypic differences in the migratory probability, as smaller sized individuals were more likely to migrate, and they might be incurring higher energetic and fitness costs than larger ones. Our results shed light on the shifting migratory strategies in a partially migratory population and highlight the nuances of anthropogenic impacts on species behavior, fitness, and evolutionary dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信