Maria W Meisner, Mark F Lenzenweger, Ole J Storebø, Lea S Petersen, Bo Bach, Erik Simonsen
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍和分裂型人格障碍的共存:范围界定综述。","authors":"Maria W Meisner, Mark F Lenzenweger, Ole J Storebø, Lea S Petersen, Bo Bach, Erik Simonsen","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2023.2254299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The historical concept of borderline conditions refers to the pathology on the border between neurosis and psychosis. In <i>DSM-III</i> the conditions were divided into specific but also somewhat overlapping diagnostic criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Schizotypal Personality Disorder (SPD). This phenomenological overlap, which results in co-occurrence of the two diagnoses, remains a clinical challenge to this day.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this issue we examined the co-occurrence of SPD and BPD according to the established <i>DSM-IV/-5</i> diagnostic criteria. A literature search was conducted including studies that employed a structured interview with defined BPD and SPD criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies from 20 samples were included (i.e. 15 patients, 3 community and 2 forensic samples). For patients diagnosed primarily with BPD, 1-27% also met the criteria for SPD and for patients diagnosed primarily with SPD, 5 - 33% showed co-occurrence with BPD. In the forensic samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 10% and 67 - 82% for primary SPD. In the community samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 29% and 50% for primary SPD. The pattern of co-occurrence across community samples was particularly heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified co-occurrences for BPD and SPD were considerably sample-dependent, and samples and measurements were generally too heterogeneous for a precise meta-analysis. Forensic and community samples generally showed higher co-occurrences, but these findings were characterized by potential methodological limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-occurrence of borderline and schizotypal personality disorders: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria W Meisner, Mark F Lenzenweger, Ole J Storebø, Lea S Petersen, Bo Bach, Erik Simonsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039488.2023.2254299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The historical concept of borderline conditions refers to the pathology on the border between neurosis and psychosis. In <i>DSM-III</i> the conditions were divided into specific but also somewhat overlapping diagnostic criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Schizotypal Personality Disorder (SPD). This phenomenological overlap, which results in co-occurrence of the two diagnoses, remains a clinical challenge to this day.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this issue we examined the co-occurrence of SPD and BPD according to the established <i>DSM-IV/-5</i> diagnostic criteria. A literature search was conducted including studies that employed a structured interview with defined BPD and SPD criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies from 20 samples were included (i.e. 15 patients, 3 community and 2 forensic samples). For patients diagnosed primarily with BPD, 1-27% also met the criteria for SPD and for patients diagnosed primarily with SPD, 5 - 33% showed co-occurrence with BPD. In the forensic samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 10% and 67 - 82% for primary SPD. In the community samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 29% and 50% for primary SPD. The pattern of co-occurrence across community samples was particularly heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified co-occurrences for BPD and SPD were considerably sample-dependent, and samples and measurements were generally too heterogeneous for a precise meta-analysis. Forensic and community samples generally showed higher co-occurrences, but these findings were characterized by potential methodological limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2023.2254299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2023.2254299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:边缘型病症的历史概念是指介于神经症和精神病之间的病症。在 DSM-III 中,这种病症被划分为边缘型人格障碍(Borderline Personality Disorder,BPD)和分裂型人格障碍(Schizotypal Personality Disorder,SPD)这两种特定但又有些重叠的诊断标准。这种现象学上的重叠导致了这两种诊断的同时出现,至今仍是临床上的一个难题:为了解决这个问题,我们根据已确立的 DSM-IV/-5 诊断标准对 SPD 和 BPD 的并发性进行了研究。我们进行了文献检索,其中包括采用结构化访谈、明确 BPD 和 SPD 标准的研究:结果:共纳入了 20 个样本的研究(即 15 个患者样本、3 个社区样本和 2 个法医样本)。在被诊断为主要患有 BPD 的患者中,1%-27% 同时符合 SPD 的标准;在被诊断为主要患有 SPD 的患者中,5%-33% 同时患有 BPD。在法医样本中,原发性BPD的共患病率为10%,原发性SPD的共患病率为67%-82%。在社区样本中,原发性BPD的并发率为29%,原发性SPD的并发率为50%。各社区样本的共现模式尤其不尽相同:结论:已确定的BPD和SPD并发率在很大程度上取决于样本,而且样本和测量方法通常过于多样,无法进行精确的荟萃分析。法医和社区样本通常显示出更高的共现率,但这些发现存在潜在的方法学局限性。
Co-occurrence of borderline and schizotypal personality disorders: a scoping review.
Background: The historical concept of borderline conditions refers to the pathology on the border between neurosis and psychosis. In DSM-III the conditions were divided into specific but also somewhat overlapping diagnostic criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Schizotypal Personality Disorder (SPD). This phenomenological overlap, which results in co-occurrence of the two diagnoses, remains a clinical challenge to this day.
Methods: To address this issue we examined the co-occurrence of SPD and BPD according to the established DSM-IV/-5 diagnostic criteria. A literature search was conducted including studies that employed a structured interview with defined BPD and SPD criteria.
Results: Studies from 20 samples were included (i.e. 15 patients, 3 community and 2 forensic samples). For patients diagnosed primarily with BPD, 1-27% also met the criteria for SPD and for patients diagnosed primarily with SPD, 5 - 33% showed co-occurrence with BPD. In the forensic samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 10% and 67 - 82% for primary SPD. In the community samples, co-occurrence for primary BPD was 29% and 50% for primary SPD. The pattern of co-occurrence across community samples was particularly heterogeneous.
Conclusion: The identified co-occurrences for BPD and SPD were considerably sample-dependent, and samples and measurements were generally too heterogeneous for a precise meta-analysis. Forensic and community samples generally showed higher co-occurrences, but these findings were characterized by potential methodological limitations.
期刊介绍:
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry.
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including:
Child psychiatry
Adult psychiatry
Psychotherapy
Pharmacotherapy
Social psychiatry
Psychosomatic medicine
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.