Md Shahjalal, Md Parvez Mosharaf, Rashidul Alam Mahumud
{"title":"孟加拉国工作场所暴力对保健工作者受伤和工作场所缺勤的影响。","authors":"Md Shahjalal, Md Parvez Mosharaf, Rashidul Alam Mahumud","doi":"10.1186/s41256-023-00316-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace violence (WPV) is an emerging problem for health workers (HWs) and a global concern in health systems. Scientific literatures infer that WPV against HWs is often attributed to workplace injuries and absenteeism, leading to a series of adverse consequences. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among Bangladeshi HWs and its association with factors related to health facilities, work environments, and rotating shift work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used participants who had experienced WPV, including medical doctors, nurses, or any form of medical staff. A total of 468 victim HWs were added in the analytical exploration. Participants were generated from our previous cross-sectional study of 1081 Bangladeshi HWs. A logistic regression model was used to find the association between workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs were 14.10% (95% CI 11.23-7.57) and 22.44% (95% CI 18.87-26.45), respectively. Injury incidence was higher among males (17.67%) and young HWs (20.83%). Workplace absenteeism was more common among male HWs (25%) and those working in public hospitals (23.46%). The magnitude of injuries and absenteeism varied significantly by hospital departments. Workplace injury was significantly higher among HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 21.53, 95% CI 2.55-181.71), intensive care (AOR = 22.94, 95% CI 2.24-234.88), surgery (AOR = 17.22, 95% CI 1.96-151.39), and gynecology & obstetrics departments (AOR = 22.42, 95% CI 2.25-223.07) compared with other departments. The burden of work-related absenteeism was significantly associated with HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.56-12.61), surgery (AOR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.42-11.90), and gynecology and obstetrics departments (AOR = 5.08, 95% CI 1.47-17.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study observed a high prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism among HWs due to WPV across hospital departments, including emergency, surgery, intensive care and gynecology & obstetrics units. Policymakers should incorporate suitable strategies into Bangladesh's national health policy to combat violence in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463430/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of workplace violence on health workers injuries and workplace absenteeism in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Md Shahjalal, Md Parvez Mosharaf, Rashidul Alam Mahumud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-023-00316-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace violence (WPV) is an emerging problem for health workers (HWs) and a global concern in health systems. Scientific literatures infer that WPV against HWs is often attributed to workplace injuries and absenteeism, leading to a series of adverse consequences. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among Bangladeshi HWs and its association with factors related to health facilities, work environments, and rotating shift work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used participants who had experienced WPV, including medical doctors, nurses, or any form of medical staff. A total of 468 victim HWs were added in the analytical exploration. Participants were generated from our previous cross-sectional study of 1081 Bangladeshi HWs. A logistic regression model was used to find the association between workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs were 14.10% (95% CI 11.23-7.57) and 22.44% (95% CI 18.87-26.45), respectively. Injury incidence was higher among males (17.67%) and young HWs (20.83%). Workplace absenteeism was more common among male HWs (25%) and those working in public hospitals (23.46%). The magnitude of injuries and absenteeism varied significantly by hospital departments. Workplace injury was significantly higher among HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 21.53, 95% CI 2.55-181.71), intensive care (AOR = 22.94, 95% CI 2.24-234.88), surgery (AOR = 17.22, 95% CI 1.96-151.39), and gynecology & obstetrics departments (AOR = 22.42, 95% CI 2.25-223.07) compared with other departments. The burden of work-related absenteeism was significantly associated with HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.56-12.61), surgery (AOR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.42-11.90), and gynecology and obstetrics departments (AOR = 5.08, 95% CI 1.47-17.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study observed a high prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism among HWs due to WPV across hospital departments, including emergency, surgery, intensive care and gynecology & obstetrics units. Policymakers should incorporate suitable strategies into Bangladesh's national health policy to combat violence in healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00316-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00316-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:工作场所暴力(WPV)是卫生工作者(HWs)面临的新问题,也是全球卫生系统关注的问题。科学文献推断,对工人的工伤往往归因于工作场所伤害和旷工,导致一系列不良后果。因此,本研究旨在调查孟加拉国卫生工作者因WPV导致的工作场所伤害和旷工的发生率,以及其与卫生设施、工作环境和轮班工作相关因素的关系。方法:本研究使用了经历过WPV的参与者,包括医生、护士或任何形式的医务人员。在分析探索中,共增加了468例受害HWs。参与者来自我们之前对1081名孟加拉国卫生工作者的横断面研究。采用logistic回归模型分析工伤与工伤缺勤之间的关系及相关因素。结果:卫生工作者因工作场所伤害和旷工的发生率分别为14.10% (95% CI 11.23 ~ 7.57)和22.44% (95% CI 18.87 ~ 26.45)。伤害发生率在男性(17.67%)和年轻卫生工作者(20.83%)中较高。男性卫生工作者(25%)和公立医院工作人员(23.46%)旷工更为普遍。受伤和缺勤的程度因医院部门而异。在急诊科(AOR = 21.53, 95% CI 2.55 ~ 181.71)、重症监护室(AOR = 22.94, 95% CI 2.24 ~ 234.88)、外科(AOR = 17.22, 95% CI 1.96 ~ 151.39)和妇产科(AOR = 22.42, 95% CI 2.25 ~ 223.07)工作的卫生工作者的工伤发生率明显高于其他科室。与工作相关的缺勤负担与在急诊科(AOR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.56-12.61)、外科(AOR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.42-11.90)和妇产科(AOR = 5.08, 95% CI 1.47-17.50)工作的卫生工作者显著相关。结论:本研究发现,医院各科室(包括急诊科、外科、重症监护室和妇产科)的卫生工作者因WPV造成的工伤和缺勤率很高。决策者应将适当的战略纳入孟加拉国的国家卫生政策,以打击卫生保健机构中的暴力行为。
Effect of workplace violence on health workers injuries and workplace absenteeism in Bangladesh.
Background: Workplace violence (WPV) is an emerging problem for health workers (HWs) and a global concern in health systems. Scientific literatures infer that WPV against HWs is often attributed to workplace injuries and absenteeism, leading to a series of adverse consequences. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among Bangladeshi HWs and its association with factors related to health facilities, work environments, and rotating shift work.
Methods: This study used participants who had experienced WPV, including medical doctors, nurses, or any form of medical staff. A total of 468 victim HWs were added in the analytical exploration. Participants were generated from our previous cross-sectional study of 1081 Bangladeshi HWs. A logistic regression model was used to find the association between workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs and associated factors.
Results: The prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism due to WPV among HWs were 14.10% (95% CI 11.23-7.57) and 22.44% (95% CI 18.87-26.45), respectively. Injury incidence was higher among males (17.67%) and young HWs (20.83%). Workplace absenteeism was more common among male HWs (25%) and those working in public hospitals (23.46%). The magnitude of injuries and absenteeism varied significantly by hospital departments. Workplace injury was significantly higher among HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 21.53, 95% CI 2.55-181.71), intensive care (AOR = 22.94, 95% CI 2.24-234.88), surgery (AOR = 17.22, 95% CI 1.96-151.39), and gynecology & obstetrics departments (AOR = 22.42, 95% CI 2.25-223.07) compared with other departments. The burden of work-related absenteeism was significantly associated with HWs who worked in the emergency (AOR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.56-12.61), surgery (AOR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.42-11.90), and gynecology and obstetrics departments (AOR = 5.08, 95% CI 1.47-17.50).
Conclusions: This study observed a high prevalence of workplace injuries and absenteeism among HWs due to WPV across hospital departments, including emergency, surgery, intensive care and gynecology & obstetrics units. Policymakers should incorporate suitable strategies into Bangladesh's national health policy to combat violence in healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.