Navid Ghavipanje, Mohammad Hasan Fathi Nasri, Mojtaba Afshin, Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini, Sajjad Khorashadi
{"title":"单峰骆驼饲粮苜蓿干草与苜蓿青贮不同比例的评价。","authors":"Navid Ghavipanje, Mohammad Hasan Fathi Nasri, Mojtaba Afshin, Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini, Sajjad Khorashadi","doi":"10.1080/1745039X.2023.2229721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two <i>in vivo</i> experiments studied the effects of different alfalfa hay (AH) to alfalfa silage (AS) ratios including 100:0 (AH100), 50:50 (AH50:AS50) and 0:100 (AS100) in total mixed rations (TMR) of dromedary camels. In experiment (Exp.) 1, a total of 18 multiparous Baluchi dairy camel [100 ± 5 days in milk (DIM); 3.65 ± 0.539 kg milk yield] were randomly allocated to one of the three groups (<i>n</i> = 6) for 42 d of experimental period. Dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield were recorded daily, and blood samples were collected on days 0, 21 and 42. In Exp. 2, 18 male Baluchi camel calves [275 ± 14 days of old; 105 ± 8 kg BW] were housed in individual shaded pens for 150 days. DMI was recorded daily and individual weights of camels were recorded monthly. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 75 and 150. In Exp.1, feeding different dietary AH:AS ratios altered neither DMI (<i>p</i> = 0.351) nor milk yield (<i>p</i> = 0.667). Of all milk components, only the milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was increased (<i>p</i> = 0.015) by AS feeding (both AH50:AS50 and/or AS100). AS feeding tended to increase AST (<i>p</i> = 0.099) and ALT (<i>p</i> = 0.092) levels in lactating camels. In Exp. 2, DMI (<i>p</i> = 0.845), average daily gain (ADG; <i>p</i> = 0.092) and return per kg BW gain (<i>p</i> = 0.710) of silage-fed camels were similar to those of hay-fed group. The plasma concentration of BUN (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and AST (<i>p</i> = 0.014) were increased in camels fed AS100. Overall, the results suggest that both AS and/or AH could be used in dromedary camel diets based on the climatic condition, season and available facilities; however, the long-term use of AS (as sole forage) should done with caution due to the potential risk of impaired liver function. Further studies needed to explore the impact of hay versus silage feeding on digestibility, rumen function and nitrogen pollution in camel feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":8157,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","volume":"77 4","pages":"275-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of different dietary alfalfa hay to alfalfa silage ratios for dromedary camel feeding.\",\"authors\":\"Navid Ghavipanje, Mohammad Hasan Fathi Nasri, Mojtaba Afshin, Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini, Sajjad Khorashadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1745039X.2023.2229721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two <i>in vivo</i> experiments studied the effects of different alfalfa hay (AH) to alfalfa silage (AS) ratios including 100:0 (AH100), 50:50 (AH50:AS50) and 0:100 (AS100) in total mixed rations (TMR) of dromedary camels. In experiment (Exp.) 1, a total of 18 multiparous Baluchi dairy camel [100 ± 5 days in milk (DIM); 3.65 ± 0.539 kg milk yield] were randomly allocated to one of the three groups (<i>n</i> = 6) for 42 d of experimental period. Dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield were recorded daily, and blood samples were collected on days 0, 21 and 42. In Exp. 2, 18 male Baluchi camel calves [275 ± 14 days of old; 105 ± 8 kg BW] were housed in individual shaded pens for 150 days. DMI was recorded daily and individual weights of camels were recorded monthly. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 75 and 150. In Exp.1, feeding different dietary AH:AS ratios altered neither DMI (<i>p</i> = 0.351) nor milk yield (<i>p</i> = 0.667). Of all milk components, only the milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was increased (<i>p</i> = 0.015) by AS feeding (both AH50:AS50 and/or AS100). AS feeding tended to increase AST (<i>p</i> = 0.099) and ALT (<i>p</i> = 0.092) levels in lactating camels. In Exp. 2, DMI (<i>p</i> = 0.845), average daily gain (ADG; <i>p</i> = 0.092) and return per kg BW gain (<i>p</i> = 0.710) of silage-fed camels were similar to those of hay-fed group. The plasma concentration of BUN (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and AST (<i>p</i> = 0.014) were increased in camels fed AS100. Overall, the results suggest that both AS and/or AH could be used in dromedary camel diets based on the climatic condition, season and available facilities; however, the long-term use of AS (as sole forage) should done with caution due to the potential risk of impaired liver function. Further studies needed to explore the impact of hay versus silage feeding on digestibility, rumen function and nitrogen pollution in camel feeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"275-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2023.2229721\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2023.2229721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of different dietary alfalfa hay to alfalfa silage ratios for dromedary camel feeding.
Two in vivo experiments studied the effects of different alfalfa hay (AH) to alfalfa silage (AS) ratios including 100:0 (AH100), 50:50 (AH50:AS50) and 0:100 (AS100) in total mixed rations (TMR) of dromedary camels. In experiment (Exp.) 1, a total of 18 multiparous Baluchi dairy camel [100 ± 5 days in milk (DIM); 3.65 ± 0.539 kg milk yield] were randomly allocated to one of the three groups (n = 6) for 42 d of experimental period. Dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield were recorded daily, and blood samples were collected on days 0, 21 and 42. In Exp. 2, 18 male Baluchi camel calves [275 ± 14 days of old; 105 ± 8 kg BW] were housed in individual shaded pens for 150 days. DMI was recorded daily and individual weights of camels were recorded monthly. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 75 and 150. In Exp.1, feeding different dietary AH:AS ratios altered neither DMI (p = 0.351) nor milk yield (p = 0.667). Of all milk components, only the milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was increased (p = 0.015) by AS feeding (both AH50:AS50 and/or AS100). AS feeding tended to increase AST (p = 0.099) and ALT (p = 0.092) levels in lactating camels. In Exp. 2, DMI (p = 0.845), average daily gain (ADG; p = 0.092) and return per kg BW gain (p = 0.710) of silage-fed camels were similar to those of hay-fed group. The plasma concentration of BUN (p = 0.014) and AST (p = 0.014) were increased in camels fed AS100. Overall, the results suggest that both AS and/or AH could be used in dromedary camel diets based on the climatic condition, season and available facilities; however, the long-term use of AS (as sole forage) should done with caution due to the potential risk of impaired liver function. Further studies needed to explore the impact of hay versus silage feeding on digestibility, rumen function and nitrogen pollution in camel feeding.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Animal Nutrition is an international journal covering the biochemical and physiological basis of animal nutrition. Emphasis is laid on original papers on protein and amino acid metabolism, energy transformation, mineral metabolism, vitamin metabolism, nutritional effects on intestinal and body functions in combination with performance criteria, respectively. It furthermore deals with recent developments in practical animal feeding, feedstuff theory, mode of action of feed additives, feedstuff preservation and feedstuff processing. The spectrum covers all relevant animal species including food producing and companion animals, but not aquatic species.
Seldom can priority be given to papers covering more descriptive studies, even if they may be interesting and technically sound or of impact for animal production, or for topics of relevance for only particular regional conditions.