Emmi Rotgers, Tea Lamberg, Tero Pihlajamaa, Christel Pussinen, Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen, Timo T Kouri
{"title":"使用临床可接受的分析性能规范验证西门子Atellica®仪器的测量值。","authors":"Emmi Rotgers, Tea Lamberg, Tero Pihlajamaa, Christel Pussinen, Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen, Timo T Kouri","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, <i>CAAPS</i>, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i>. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i>, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> in whole blood (B-HbA<sub>1c</sub>), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was compared with previously developed <i>CAAPS</i>. The calculated <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 1.4% for B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> (<i>CAAPS</i> 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, <i>CAAPS</i> 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (<i>CAAPS</i> 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (<i>CAAPS</i> 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (<i>CAAPS</i> 22.9%). The <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (<i>CAAPS</i> for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (<i>CAAPS</i> 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i> when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the <i>CAAPS</i> estimates of B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> and P-LDL-C.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications.\",\"authors\":\"Emmi Rotgers, Tea Lamberg, Tero Pihlajamaa, Christel Pussinen, Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen, Timo T Kouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, <i>CAAPS</i>, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i>. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i>, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> in whole blood (B-HbA<sub>1c</sub>), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was compared with previously developed <i>CAAPS</i>. The calculated <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 1.4% for B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> (<i>CAAPS</i> 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, <i>CAAPS</i> 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (<i>CAAPS</i> 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (<i>CAAPS</i> 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (<i>CAAPS</i> 22.9%). The <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (<i>CAAPS</i> for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (<i>CAAPS</i> 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i> when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the <i>CAAPS</i> estimates of B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> and P-LDL-C.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"408-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications.
Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, CAAPS, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, CVI. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, CVA, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A1c in whole blood (B-HbA1c), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental CVA was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained CVA was compared with previously developed CAAPS. The calculated CVA was 1.4% for B-HbA1c (CAAPS 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, CAAPS 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (CAAPS 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (CAAPS 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (CAAPS 22.9%). The CVA was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (CAAPS for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (CAAPS 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider CVI when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the CAAPS estimates of B-HbA1c and P-LDL-C.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.