Vaxzevria疫苗接种后的粘膜抗体反应。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Kevin J Selva, Pradhipa Ramanathan, Ebene R Haycroft, Chee Wah Tan, Lin-Fa Wang, Laura E Downie, Samantha K Davis, Ruth A Purcell, Helen E Kent, Jennifer A Juno, Adam K Wheatley, Miles P Davenport, Stephen J Kent, Amy W Chung
{"title":"Vaxzevria疫苗接种后的粘膜抗体反应。","authors":"Kevin J Selva,&nbsp;Pradhipa Ramanathan,&nbsp;Ebene R Haycroft,&nbsp;Chee Wah Tan,&nbsp;Lin-Fa Wang,&nbsp;Laura E Downie,&nbsp;Samantha K Davis,&nbsp;Ruth A Purcell,&nbsp;Helen E Kent,&nbsp;Jennifer A Juno,&nbsp;Adam K Wheatley,&nbsp;Miles P Davenport,&nbsp;Stephen J Kent,&nbsp;Amy W Chung","doi":"10.1111/imcb.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mucosal antibodies play a key role in protection against breakthrough COVID-19 infections and emerging viral variants. Intramuscular adenovirus-based vaccination (Vaxzevria) only weakly induces nasal IgG and IgA responses, unless vaccinees have been previously infected. However, little is known about how Vaxzevria vaccination impacts the ability of mucosal antibodies to induce Fc responses, particularly against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we profiled paired mucosal (saliva, tears) and plasma antibodies from COVID-19 vaccinated only vaccinees (uninfected, vaccinated) and COVID-19 recovered vaccinees (COVID-19 recovered, vaccinated) who both received Vaxzevria vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 ancestral-specific IgG antibodies capable of engaging FcγR3a were significantly higher in the mucosal samples of COVID-19 recovered Vaxzevria vaccinees in comparison with vaccinated only vaccinees. However, when IgG and FcγR3a engaging antibodies were tested against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 VoCs, the responses were ancestral-centric with weaker recognition of Omicron strains observed. In contrast, salivary IgA, but not plasma IgA, from Vaxzevria vaccinees displayed broad cross-reactivity across all SARS-CoV-2 VoCs tested. Our data highlight that while intramuscular Vaxzevria vaccination can enhance mucosal antibodies responses in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees, restrictions by ancestral-centric bias may have implications for COVID-19 protection. However, highly cross-reactive mucosal IgA could be key in addressing these gaps in mucosal immunity and may be an important focus of future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development.</p>","PeriodicalId":179,"journal":{"name":"Immunology & Cell Biology","volume":"101 10","pages":"975-983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mucosal antibody responses following Vaxzevria vaccination\",\"authors\":\"Kevin J Selva,&nbsp;Pradhipa Ramanathan,&nbsp;Ebene R Haycroft,&nbsp;Chee Wah Tan,&nbsp;Lin-Fa Wang,&nbsp;Laura E Downie,&nbsp;Samantha K Davis,&nbsp;Ruth A Purcell,&nbsp;Helen E Kent,&nbsp;Jennifer A Juno,&nbsp;Adam K Wheatley,&nbsp;Miles P Davenport,&nbsp;Stephen J Kent,&nbsp;Amy W Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imcb.12685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mucosal antibodies play a key role in protection against breakthrough COVID-19 infections and emerging viral variants. Intramuscular adenovirus-based vaccination (Vaxzevria) only weakly induces nasal IgG and IgA responses, unless vaccinees have been previously infected. However, little is known about how Vaxzevria vaccination impacts the ability of mucosal antibodies to induce Fc responses, particularly against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we profiled paired mucosal (saliva, tears) and plasma antibodies from COVID-19 vaccinated only vaccinees (uninfected, vaccinated) and COVID-19 recovered vaccinees (COVID-19 recovered, vaccinated) who both received Vaxzevria vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 ancestral-specific IgG antibodies capable of engaging FcγR3a were significantly higher in the mucosal samples of COVID-19 recovered Vaxzevria vaccinees in comparison with vaccinated only vaccinees. However, when IgG and FcγR3a engaging antibodies were tested against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 VoCs, the responses were ancestral-centric with weaker recognition of Omicron strains observed. In contrast, salivary IgA, but not plasma IgA, from Vaxzevria vaccinees displayed broad cross-reactivity across all SARS-CoV-2 VoCs tested. Our data highlight that while intramuscular Vaxzevria vaccination can enhance mucosal antibodies responses in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees, restrictions by ancestral-centric bias may have implications for COVID-19 protection. However, highly cross-reactive mucosal IgA could be key in addressing these gaps in mucosal immunity and may be an important focus of future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunology & Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\"101 10\",\"pages\":\"975-983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunology & Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imcb.12685\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology & Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imcb.12685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粘膜抗体在预防突破性新冠肺炎感染和新出现的病毒变异方面发挥着关键作用。基于腺病毒的肌肉内疫苗接种(Vaxzevria)只能微弱地诱导鼻腔IgG和IgA反应,除非接种者以前感染过。然而,关于Vaxzevria疫苗接种如何影响粘膜抗体诱导Fc反应的能力,尤其是针对SARS-CoV-2变异毒株(VoCs)的能力,目前知之甚少。在这里,我们描述了新冠肺炎疫苗接种者(未感染、接种)和新冠肺炎康复疫苗接种者的成对粘膜(唾液、眼泪)和血浆抗体(新冠肺炎康复、接种),他们都接种了Vaxzevria疫苗。与仅接种疫苗的接种者相比,新冠肺炎康复Vaxzevria疫苗接种者粘膜样本中能够与FcγR3a结合的SARS-CoV-2癌症特异性IgG抗体显著更高。然而,当IgG和FcγR3a结合抗体针对一组严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型VOC进行测试时,反应以祖先为中心,观察到对奥密克戎毒株的识别较弱。相反,来自Vaxzevria疫苗接种者的唾液IgA,而不是血浆IgA,在所有测试的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型VOC中显示出广泛的交叉反应性。我们的数据强调,虽然肌肉注射Vaxzevria疫苗可以增强新冠肺炎康复疫苗接种者的粘膜抗体反应,但以癌症为中心的偏见的限制可能会对新冠肺炎的保护产生影响。然而,高度交叉反应的粘膜IgA可能是解决粘膜免疫缺口的关键,也可能是未来严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗开发的重要重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mucosal antibody responses following Vaxzevria vaccination

Mucosal antibody responses following Vaxzevria vaccination

Mucosal antibodies play a key role in protection against breakthrough COVID-19 infections and emerging viral variants. Intramuscular adenovirus-based vaccination (Vaxzevria) only weakly induces nasal IgG and IgA responses, unless vaccinees have been previously infected. However, little is known about how Vaxzevria vaccination impacts the ability of mucosal antibodies to induce Fc responses, particularly against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we profiled paired mucosal (saliva, tears) and plasma antibodies from COVID-19 vaccinated only vaccinees (uninfected, vaccinated) and COVID-19 recovered vaccinees (COVID-19 recovered, vaccinated) who both received Vaxzevria vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 ancestral-specific IgG antibodies capable of engaging FcγR3a were significantly higher in the mucosal samples of COVID-19 recovered Vaxzevria vaccinees in comparison with vaccinated only vaccinees. However, when IgG and FcγR3a engaging antibodies were tested against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 VoCs, the responses were ancestral-centric with weaker recognition of Omicron strains observed. In contrast, salivary IgA, but not plasma IgA, from Vaxzevria vaccinees displayed broad cross-reactivity across all SARS-CoV-2 VoCs tested. Our data highlight that while intramuscular Vaxzevria vaccination can enhance mucosal antibodies responses in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees, restrictions by ancestral-centric bias may have implications for COVID-19 protection. However, highly cross-reactive mucosal IgA could be key in addressing these gaps in mucosal immunity and may be an important focus of future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunology & Cell Biology
Immunology & Cell Biology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australasian Society for Immunology Incorporated (ASI) was created by the amalgamation in 1991 of the Australian Society for Immunology, formed in 1970, and the New Zealand Society for Immunology, formed in 1975. The aim of the Society is to encourage and support the discipline of immunology in the Australasian region. It is a broadly based Society, embracing clinical and experimental, cellular and molecular immunology in humans and animals. The Society provides a network for the exchange of information and for collaboration within Australia, New Zealand and overseas. ASI members have been prominent in advancing biological and medical research worldwide. We seek to encourage the study of immunology in Australia and New Zealand and are active in introducing young scientists to the discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信