呼吁抵制职业治疗对残疾歧视的促进。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Karen Whalley Hammell
{"title":"呼吁抵制职业治疗对残疾歧视的促进。","authors":"Karen Whalley Hammell","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2022.2130821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical occupational therapists have exhorted their profession to engage with disability studies' scholarship, curtail occupational therapy's promotion of ableism and amend its disabling practices. These appeals have largely been ignored despite their importance for a profession that researches, theorizes, assesses, and intervenes in the lives of disabled people.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To interrogate occupational therapy's collusion with an ableist neoliberal agenda; and call for occupational therapists to resist their profession's disabling practices.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This paper draws from critical disability scholarship to expose, critique and contest the ableist ideology underpinning occupational therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interlinked with racism, heteronormativity and gender binarism, ableism upholds certain bodies as normal and appropriate. Ableist values shape occupational therapy, with clients classified according to their proximity to 'normality', and exhorted to minimize their occupational performance deviations from dominant norms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collusion with colonialism's binary classificatory systems and neoliberal ableist norms, and avowed aspirations to improve bodies, 'normalize' performances, promote individualism, self-reliance, independence, self-care, and productivity contribute to the perception that ours is a disabling profession.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This paper calls for occupational therapists to resist their profession's promotion of ableism, and refuse to collude with colonial practices that contribute to the oppression of disabled people.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A call to resist occupational therapy's promotion of ableism.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Whalley Hammell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11038128.2022.2130821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical occupational therapists have exhorted their profession to engage with disability studies' scholarship, curtail occupational therapy's promotion of ableism and amend its disabling practices. These appeals have largely been ignored despite their importance for a profession that researches, theorizes, assesses, and intervenes in the lives of disabled people.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To interrogate occupational therapy's collusion with an ableist neoliberal agenda; and call for occupational therapists to resist their profession's disabling practices.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This paper draws from critical disability scholarship to expose, critique and contest the ableist ideology underpinning occupational therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interlinked with racism, heteronormativity and gender binarism, ableism upholds certain bodies as normal and appropriate. Ableist values shape occupational therapy, with clients classified according to their proximity to 'normality', and exhorted to minimize their occupational performance deviations from dominant norms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collusion with colonialism's binary classificatory systems and neoliberal ableist norms, and avowed aspirations to improve bodies, 'normalize' performances, promote individualism, self-reliance, independence, self-care, and productivity contribute to the perception that ours is a disabling profession.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This paper calls for occupational therapists to resist their profession's promotion of ableism, and refuse to collude with colonial practices that contribute to the oppression of disabled people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2130821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2130821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:关键的职业治疗师已经劝告他们的职业参与残疾研究的学术研究,减少职业治疗对残疾歧视的促进,并修改其残疾实践。这些呼吁在很大程度上被忽视了,尽管它们对于一个研究、理论化、评估和干预残疾人生活的职业来说很重要。目的和目标:探究职业治疗与能力主义新自由主义议程的勾结;并呼吁职业治疗师抵制他们职业的致残行为。材料和方法:本文借鉴批判性残疾学术,揭露、批判和争论支撑职业治疗的残疾主义意识形态。结果:残疾歧视与种族主义、异性恋和性别二元论有关,认为某些身体是正常和适当的。Ableist价值观塑造了职业治疗,根据客户与“正常”的接近程度对其进行分类,并劝告他们尽量减少对主导规范的职业表现偏差。结论:与殖民主义的二元分类系统和新自由主义的健康主义规范相勾结,以及公开宣称的改善身体、“正常化”表演、促进个人主义、自力更生、独立、自我照顾和生产力的愿望,导致了我们的职业是一个残疾的职业。意义:本文呼吁职业治疗师抵制其职业对残疾歧视的宣传,拒绝与殖民主义的做法勾结,从而导致对残疾人的压迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A call to resist occupational therapy's promotion of ableism.

Background: Critical occupational therapists have exhorted their profession to engage with disability studies' scholarship, curtail occupational therapy's promotion of ableism and amend its disabling practices. These appeals have largely been ignored despite their importance for a profession that researches, theorizes, assesses, and intervenes in the lives of disabled people.

Aims and objectives: To interrogate occupational therapy's collusion with an ableist neoliberal agenda; and call for occupational therapists to resist their profession's disabling practices.

Material and methods: This paper draws from critical disability scholarship to expose, critique and contest the ableist ideology underpinning occupational therapy.

Results: Interlinked with racism, heteronormativity and gender binarism, ableism upholds certain bodies as normal and appropriate. Ableist values shape occupational therapy, with clients classified according to their proximity to 'normality', and exhorted to minimize their occupational performance deviations from dominant norms.

Conclusions: Collusion with colonialism's binary classificatory systems and neoliberal ableist norms, and avowed aspirations to improve bodies, 'normalize' performances, promote individualism, self-reliance, independence, self-care, and productivity contribute to the perception that ours is a disabling profession.

Significance: This paper calls for occupational therapists to resist their profession's promotion of ableism, and refuse to collude with colonial practices that contribute to the oppression of disabled people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信