家庭心脏康复对心血管危险因素管理的影响。

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Chul Kim, Seok Hyeon Lee
{"title":"家庭心脏康复对心血管危险因素管理的影响。","authors":"Chul Kim,&nbsp;Seok Hyeon Lee","doi":"10.5535/arm.23041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) in cardiovascular risk factor management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed retrospective review of the electronic medical records of 72 patients who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for the first time. The participants were stratified into the HBCR group, receiving educational programs and performing self-exercise at home, and the CBCR group, participating in electrocardiogram monitoring monitoring exercise training in hospital settings. The results of the Lifestyle Questionnaire survey were investigated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in serum low-density lipoprotein levels, frequency of alcohol consumption, eating habits and psychological status. Moderate-intensity exercise duration and the maximal metabolic equivalents values improved significantly in both groups but slightly more in the CBCR group. However, the number of current smokers increased in both groups, and no significant changes were found in body mass index, serum glycated hemoglobin levels, serum high-density lipoprotein levels, or high-intensity exercise duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the CR program type, a patient's lifestyle can be modified. Therefore, patients should continue participating in any type of CR program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":"47 4","pages":"272-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/93/arm-23041.PMC10475815.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management.\",\"authors\":\"Chul Kim,&nbsp;Seok Hyeon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5535/arm.23041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) in cardiovascular risk factor management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed retrospective review of the electronic medical records of 72 patients who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for the first time. The participants were stratified into the HBCR group, receiving educational programs and performing self-exercise at home, and the CBCR group, participating in electrocardiogram monitoring monitoring exercise training in hospital settings. The results of the Lifestyle Questionnaire survey were investigated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvements in serum low-density lipoprotein levels, frequency of alcohol consumption, eating habits and psychological status. Moderate-intensity exercise duration and the maximal metabolic equivalents values improved significantly in both groups but slightly more in the CBCR group. However, the number of current smokers increased in both groups, and no significant changes were found in body mass index, serum glycated hemoglobin levels, serum high-density lipoprotein levels, or high-intensity exercise duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the CR program type, a patient's lifestyle can be modified. Therefore, patients should continue participating in any type of CR program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"272-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/93/arm-23041.PMC10475815.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较以家庭为基础的心脏康复(HBCR)与以中心为基础的心脏康复(CBCR)在心血管危险因素管理中的疗效。方法:回顾性分析72例因急性冠状动脉综合征住院并首次参加心脏康复(CR)计划的患者的电子病历。参与者被分为HBCR组,接受教育计划并在家中进行自我锻炼,CBCR组,在医院环境中参加心电图监测监测运动训练。生活方式问卷调查的结果分别在基线、3个月和6个月进行调查。结果:两组患者血清低密度脂蛋白水平、饮酒频率、饮食习惯和心理状态均有显著改善。中强度运动时间和最大代谢当量值在两组中均有显著改善,但CBCR组略有改善。然而,两组中当前吸烟者的数量都有所增加,并且在体重指数、血清糖化血红蛋白水平、血清高密度脂蛋白水平或高强度运动持续时间方面没有发现显著变化。结论:无论CR计划类型如何,患者的生活方式都是可以改变的。因此,患者应继续参加任何类型的CR计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management.

The Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management.

The Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management.

The Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors Management.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) in cardiovascular risk factor management.

Methods: We performed retrospective review of the electronic medical records of 72 patients who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for the first time. The participants were stratified into the HBCR group, receiving educational programs and performing self-exercise at home, and the CBCR group, participating in electrocardiogram monitoring monitoring exercise training in hospital settings. The results of the Lifestyle Questionnaire survey were investigated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in serum low-density lipoprotein levels, frequency of alcohol consumption, eating habits and psychological status. Moderate-intensity exercise duration and the maximal metabolic equivalents values improved significantly in both groups but slightly more in the CBCR group. However, the number of current smokers increased in both groups, and no significant changes were found in body mass index, serum glycated hemoglobin levels, serum high-density lipoprotein levels, or high-intensity exercise duration.

Conclusion: Regardless of the CR program type, a patient's lifestyle can be modified. Therefore, patients should continue participating in any type of CR program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信