合作评估方法的系统研究综述。

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1037/pst0000477

Filippo Aschieri, Arnold A P van Emmerik, Carlijn J M Wibbelink, Jan H Kamphuis

{"title":"合作评估方法的系统研究综述。","authors":"Filippo Aschieri, Arnold A P van Emmerik, Carlijn J M Wibbelink, Jan H Kamphuis","doi":"10.1037/pst0000477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative assessment methods (CAMs) involve working with clients during all phases of the assessment process, from goal definition to interpretation of the testing results to the recommendations and conclusions. In this article, we define CAMs, provide clinical examples, and then meta-analyze the published literature to assess their effectiveness on distal treatment outcomes. Our meta-analytic results indicate that CAMs have positive effects on three outcome domains: a moderate effect on treatment processes, a small-to-moderate effect on personal growth, and a small effect on symptom reduction. There is little research evidence on the immediate, in-session effects of CAMs. We include diversity considerations, training implications. and therapeutic practices grounded in this research evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"60 3","pages":"355-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic research review of collaborative assessment methods.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Aschieri, Arnold A P van Emmerik, Carlijn J M Wibbelink, Jan H Kamphuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collaborative assessment methods (CAMs) involve working with clients during all phases of the assessment process, from goal definition to interpretation of the testing results to the recommendations and conclusions. In this article, we define CAMs, provide clinical examples, and then meta-analyze the published literature to assess their effectiveness on distal treatment outcomes. Our meta-analytic results indicate that CAMs have positive effects on three outcome domains: a moderate effect on treatment processes, a small-to-moderate effect on personal growth, and a small effect on symptom reduction. There is little research evidence on the immediate, in-session effects of CAMs. We include diversity considerations, training implications. and therapeutic practices grounded in this research evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"355-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

协作评估方法（CAM）涉及在评估过程的所有阶段与客户合作，从目标定义到测试结果的解释，再到建议和结论。在本文中，我们对协作评估法进行了定义，提供了临床实例，然后对已发表的文献进行了元分析，以评估其对远端治疗结果的有效性。我们的元分析结果表明，心理治疗方法对三个结果领域有积极影响：对治疗过程有中等程度的影响，对个人成长有小到中等程度的影响，对症状减轻有小幅影响。关于 CAMs 在治疗过程中的即时效果的研究证据很少。我们在研究证据中加入了多样性考虑因素、培训影响和治疗实践。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A systematic research review of collaborative assessment methods.

Collaborative assessment methods (CAMs) involve working with clients during all phases of the assessment process, from goal definition to interpretation of the testing results to the recommendations and conclusions. In this article, we define CAMs, provide clinical examples, and then meta-analyze the published literature to assess their effectiveness on distal treatment outcomes. Our meta-analytic results indicate that CAMs have positive effects on three outcome domains: a moderate effect on treatment processes, a small-to-moderate effect on personal growth, and a small effect on symptom reduction. There is little research evidence on the immediate, in-session effects of CAMs. We include diversity considerations, training implications. and therapeutic practices grounded in this research evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

12.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.