[德语版成人无组织依恋自评量表(ADA-D)的验证]。

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Eva Flemming, Laura Lübke, Sascha Müller, Lisa Petra Sophia Rümler, Carsten Spitzer
{"title":"[德语版成人无组织依恋自评量表(ADA-D)的验证]。","authors":"Eva Flemming,&nbsp;Laura Lübke,&nbsp;Sascha Müller,&nbsp;Lisa Petra Sophia Rümler,&nbsp;Carsten Spitzer","doi":"10.1055/a-2140-8260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Disorganized attachment represents the greatest risk factor for psychopathology compared to the \"organized\" insecure attachment dimensions in various meta-analyses. Recently, the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale (ADA) was developed as a self-rating scale for measuring disorganized attachment in romantic partnerships. However, a translation and evaluation in German-speaking samples is not yet available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A German Translation of the scale (ADA-D) comprising nine items was assessed in a general population sample (<i>N</i>=1101) and in a student sample (<i>N</i>=328). The factor structure, psychometric properties, and validity of the scale with respect to psychopathology and the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire (ECR-RD) were examined. The differential associations of ADA-D and ECR-RD with psychopathology were determined using linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unidimensional factor structure of the original version could be confirmed for the ADA-D and the instrument exhibited high internal consistency (McDonalds <i>ω</i>=0.91 / 0.89). Compared to attachment anxiety and avoidance, ADA-D was the strongest predictor of dissociative symptoms (Sample 1: <i>β</i>=0.48; <i>p</i><0.001; Sample 2: <i>β</i>=0.23; <i>p</i><0.01) and, in Sample 1, additionally for physical aggression (<i>β</i>=0.37; <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>  The ADA-D exhibits good psychometric properties that are comparable to the original version of the scale. The associations with aggressiveness and dissociation are in line with previous findings regarding the unresolved attachment status in the Adult Attachment Interview.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ADA-D can be recommended for further use in research as a screening instrument for disorganized attachment in adulthood. An application in psychotherapeutic diagnostics seems promising, however, evaluations in clinical samples are necessary beforehand.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation of a German version of the self-rating Adult Disorganized Attachment scale (ADA-D)].\",\"authors\":\"Eva Flemming,&nbsp;Laura Lübke,&nbsp;Sascha Müller,&nbsp;Lisa Petra Sophia Rümler,&nbsp;Carsten Spitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2140-8260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Disorganized attachment represents the greatest risk factor for psychopathology compared to the \\\"organized\\\" insecure attachment dimensions in various meta-analyses. Recently, the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale (ADA) was developed as a self-rating scale for measuring disorganized attachment in romantic partnerships. However, a translation and evaluation in German-speaking samples is not yet available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A German Translation of the scale (ADA-D) comprising nine items was assessed in a general population sample (<i>N</i>=1101) and in a student sample (<i>N</i>=328). The factor structure, psychometric properties, and validity of the scale with respect to psychopathology and the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire (ECR-RD) were examined. The differential associations of ADA-D and ECR-RD with psychopathology were determined using linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unidimensional factor structure of the original version could be confirmed for the ADA-D and the instrument exhibited high internal consistency (McDonalds <i>ω</i>=0.91 / 0.89). Compared to attachment anxiety and avoidance, ADA-D was the strongest predictor of dissociative symptoms (Sample 1: <i>β</i>=0.48; <i>p</i><0.001; Sample 2: <i>β</i>=0.23; <i>p</i><0.01) and, in Sample 1, additionally for physical aggression (<i>β</i>=0.37; <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>  The ADA-D exhibits good psychometric properties that are comparable to the original version of the scale. The associations with aggressiveness and dissociation are in line with previous findings regarding the unresolved attachment status in the Adult Attachment Interview.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ADA-D can be recommended for further use in research as a screening instrument for disorganized attachment in adulthood. An application in psychotherapeutic diagnostics seems promising, however, evaluations in clinical samples are necessary beforehand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2140-8260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2140-8260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在各种荟萃分析中,与“有组织”的不安全依恋维度相比,无序依恋是精神病理学的最大风险因素。最近,成人无组织依恋量表(ADA)被开发为一种自评量表,用于测量浪漫伴侣关系中的无组织依恋。然而,目前还没有德语样本的翻译和评估。方法:在一般人群样本(N=1101)和学生样本(N=328)中评估包括9个项目的德语翻译量表(ADA-D)。考察了该量表的因子结构、心理测量特性以及与精神病理学和亲密关系经历问卷(ECR-RD)相关的有效性。使用线性回归模型确定ADA-D和ECR-RD与精神病理学的差异关联。结果:ADA-D可以确认原始版本的一维因子结构,并且该仪器表现出高度的内部一致性(McDonaldsω=0.91/0.89)。与依恋焦虑和回避相比,ADA-D是解离症状的最强预测因子(样本1:β=0.48;pβ=0.23;pβ=0.037;p讨论:  ADA-D表现出良好的心理测量特性,与原始版本的量表相当。与攻击性和解离性的关联与之前在成人依恋访谈中关于未解决依恋状态的研究结果一致。结论:ADA-D可作为成年期无组织依恋的筛查工具,推荐在研究中进一步使用。在心理治疗诊断中的应用似乎很有希望,然而,事先对临床样本进行评估是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validation of a German version of the self-rating Adult Disorganized Attachment scale (ADA-D)].

Objective: Disorganized attachment represents the greatest risk factor for psychopathology compared to the "organized" insecure attachment dimensions in various meta-analyses. Recently, the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale (ADA) was developed as a self-rating scale for measuring disorganized attachment in romantic partnerships. However, a translation and evaluation in German-speaking samples is not yet available.

Methods: A German Translation of the scale (ADA-D) comprising nine items was assessed in a general population sample (N=1101) and in a student sample (N=328). The factor structure, psychometric properties, and validity of the scale with respect to psychopathology and the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire (ECR-RD) were examined. The differential associations of ADA-D and ECR-RD with psychopathology were determined using linear regression models.

Results: The unidimensional factor structure of the original version could be confirmed for the ADA-D and the instrument exhibited high internal consistency (McDonalds ω=0.91 / 0.89). Compared to attachment anxiety and avoidance, ADA-D was the strongest predictor of dissociative symptoms (Sample 1: β=0.48; p<0.001; Sample 2: β=0.23; p<0.01) and, in Sample 1, additionally for physical aggression (β=0.37; p<0.001).

Discussion:   The ADA-D exhibits good psychometric properties that are comparable to the original version of the scale. The associations with aggressiveness and dissociation are in line with previous findings regarding the unresolved attachment status in the Adult Attachment Interview.

Conclusion: The ADA-D can be recommended for further use in research as a screening instrument for disorganized attachment in adulthood. An application in psychotherapeutic diagnostics seems promising, however, evaluations in clinical samples are necessary beforehand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信