{"title":"收缩期后指数在促进中危或低危非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险分层中的作用","authors":"Kenji Masada, Takayuki Hidaka, Yoji Urabe, Naoya Mitsuba, Hironori Ueda","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00612-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is reportedly a usefulness of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in excluding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in suspected intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the efficacy of post-systolic index (PSI) in this context is yet unknown. Therefore, we explored the usefulness of PSI in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We assessed 50 consecutive patients suspected of intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS, and finally analyzed 43 patients whose echocardiographic images were suitable for strain analysis. All patients underwent CAG. Among the 43 analyzed patients, 26 had CAD, and 21 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with CAD had higher PSI (25% [20.8-40.3%] vs 15% [8.0-27.5%], P = 0.007). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis identified that a PSI of > 20% detected performance of PCI (sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 70.6%, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.88). Moreover, the AUC obtained using the GRACE risk score was 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.75), and increased to 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90) when PSI and LV GLS were added. Thus, the addition of PSI and LV GLS improved the classification of performance of PCI (net reclassification improvement [95%CI] 0.09 [0.0024-0.18], P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-systolic index is a useful parameter that can facilitate stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS. We recommend measuring PSI in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of post-systolic index in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Masada, Takayuki Hidaka, Yoji Urabe, Naoya Mitsuba, Hironori Ueda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12574-023-00612-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is reportedly a usefulness of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in excluding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in suspected intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the efficacy of post-systolic index (PSI) in this context is yet unknown. Therefore, we explored the usefulness of PSI in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We assessed 50 consecutive patients suspected of intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS, and finally analyzed 43 patients whose echocardiographic images were suitable for strain analysis. All patients underwent CAG. Among the 43 analyzed patients, 26 had CAD, and 21 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with CAD had higher PSI (25% [20.8-40.3%] vs 15% [8.0-27.5%], P = 0.007). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis identified that a PSI of > 20% detected performance of PCI (sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 70.6%, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.88). Moreover, the AUC obtained using the GRACE risk score was 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.75), and increased to 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90) when PSI and LV GLS were added. Thus, the addition of PSI and LV GLS improved the classification of performance of PCI (net reclassification improvement [95%CI] 0.09 [0.0024-0.18], P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-systolic index is a useful parameter that can facilitate stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS. We recommend measuring PSI in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00612-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00612-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然有报道称二维斑点跟踪超声心动图上的左心室整体纵向应变(LV GLS)在排除疑似中低风险非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的显著冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面是有用的,但收缩期后指数(PSI)在这种情况下的疗效尚不清楚。因此,我们探讨了PSI在促进中低风险NSTE-ACS患者风险分层中的作用。方法和结果:我们对50例疑似中低危NSTE-ACS患者进行了连续评估,最终分析了43例超声心动图图像适合应变分析的患者。所有患者均行CAG。在分析的43例患者中,26例患有CAD, 21例接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。CAD患者PSI较高(25% [20.8-40.3%]vs 15% [8.0-27.5%], P = 0.007)。接受者-操作者特征曲线分析发现,PSI为> - 20%时,可检测PCI的疗效(敏感性80.7%,特异性70.6%,曲线下面积[AUC] 0.72, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.57-0.88)。此外,使用GRACE风险评分获得的AUC为0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.75),当添加PSI和LV GLS时,AUC增加到0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90)。因此,PSI和LV GLS的加入改善了PCI的性能分类(净再分类改善[95%CI] 0.09 [0.0024-0.18], P = 0.04)。结论:收缩期后指数是一个有用的参数,可以促进中低危NSTE-ACS患者的风险分层。我们建议在常规临床实践中测量PSI。
Usefulness of post-systolic index in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Background: Although there is reportedly a usefulness of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in excluding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in suspected intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the efficacy of post-systolic index (PSI) in this context is yet unknown. Therefore, we explored the usefulness of PSI in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.
Methods and results: We assessed 50 consecutive patients suspected of intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS, and finally analyzed 43 patients whose echocardiographic images were suitable for strain analysis. All patients underwent CAG. Among the 43 analyzed patients, 26 had CAD, and 21 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with CAD had higher PSI (25% [20.8-40.3%] vs 15% [8.0-27.5%], P = 0.007). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis identified that a PSI of > 20% detected performance of PCI (sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 70.6%, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.88). Moreover, the AUC obtained using the GRACE risk score was 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.75), and increased to 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90) when PSI and LV GLS were added. Thus, the addition of PSI and LV GLS improved the classification of performance of PCI (net reclassification improvement [95%CI] 0.09 [0.0024-0.18], P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Post-systolic index is a useful parameter that can facilitate stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS. We recommend measuring PSI in routine clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Echocardiography, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, publishes work that contributes to progress in the field and articles in clinical research as well, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with this discipline. The journal welcomes original investigations, review articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and case image in cardiovascular ultrasound, which will be reviewed by the editorial board. The Journal of Echocardiography provides the best of up-to-date information from around the world, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.