感觉被爱是关系互动中的一个强有力的纽带:感觉被爱的伴侣可能会缓冲感觉不被爱的行为者的破坏性行为。

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Eri Sasaki, Nickola C Overall, Harry T Reis, Francesca Righetti, Valerie T Chang, Rachel S T Low, Annette M E Henderson, Caitlin S McRae, Emily J Cross, Shanuki D Jayamaha, Michael R Maniaci, Camille J Reid
{"title":"感觉被爱是关系互动中的一个强有力的纽带:感觉被爱的伴侣可能会缓冲感觉不被爱的行为者的破坏性行为。","authors":"Eri Sasaki,&nbsp;Nickola C Overall,&nbsp;Harry T Reis,&nbsp;Francesca Righetti,&nbsp;Valerie T Chang,&nbsp;Rachel S T Low,&nbsp;Annette M E Henderson,&nbsp;Caitlin S McRae,&nbsp;Emily J Cross,&nbsp;Shanuki D Jayamaha,&nbsp;Michael R Maniaci,&nbsp;Camille J Reid","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeling loved (loved, cared for, accepted, valued, understood) is inherently dyadic, yet most prior theoretical perspectives and investigations have focused on how actors feeling (un)loved shapes actors' outcomes. Adopting a dyadic perspective, the present research tested whether the established links between actors feeling unloved and destructive (critical, hostile) behavior depended on partners' feelings of being loved. Does feeling loved need to be mutual to reduce destructive behavior, or can partners feeling loved compensate for actors feeling unloved? In five dyadic observational studies, couples were recorded discussing conflicts, diverging preferences or relationship strengths, or interacting with their child (total <i>N</i> = 842 couples; 1,965 interactions). Participants reported how much they felt loved during each interaction and independent coders rated how much each person exhibited destructive behavior. Significant Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved interactions revealed a <i>strong-link/mutual felt-unloved</i> pattern: partners' high felt-loved buffered the damaging effect of actors' low felt-loved on destructive behavior, resulting in actors' destructive behavior mostly occurring when both actors' and partners' felt-loved was low. This dyadic pattern also emerged in three supplemental daily sampling studies. Providing directional support for the <i>strong-link/mutual felt-unloved</i> pattern, in Studies 4 and 5 involving two or more sequential interactions, Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved in one interaction predicted actors' destructive behavior within couples' subsequent conflict interactions. The results illustrate the dyadic nature of feeling loved: Partners feeling loved can protect against actors feeling unloved in challenging interactions. Assessing Actor × Partner effects should be equally valuable for advancing understanding of other fundamentally dyadic relationship processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"125 2","pages":"367-396"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeling loved as a strong link in relationship interactions: Partners who feel loved may buffer destructive behavior by actors who feel unloved.\",\"authors\":\"Eri Sasaki,&nbsp;Nickola C Overall,&nbsp;Harry T Reis,&nbsp;Francesca Righetti,&nbsp;Valerie T Chang,&nbsp;Rachel S T Low,&nbsp;Annette M E Henderson,&nbsp;Caitlin S McRae,&nbsp;Emily J Cross,&nbsp;Shanuki D Jayamaha,&nbsp;Michael R Maniaci,&nbsp;Camille J Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pspi0000419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Feeling loved (loved, cared for, accepted, valued, understood) is inherently dyadic, yet most prior theoretical perspectives and investigations have focused on how actors feeling (un)loved shapes actors' outcomes. Adopting a dyadic perspective, the present research tested whether the established links between actors feeling unloved and destructive (critical, hostile) behavior depended on partners' feelings of being loved. Does feeling loved need to be mutual to reduce destructive behavior, or can partners feeling loved compensate for actors feeling unloved? In five dyadic observational studies, couples were recorded discussing conflicts, diverging preferences or relationship strengths, or interacting with their child (total <i>N</i> = 842 couples; 1,965 interactions). Participants reported how much they felt loved during each interaction and independent coders rated how much each person exhibited destructive behavior. Significant Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved interactions revealed a <i>strong-link/mutual felt-unloved</i> pattern: partners' high felt-loved buffered the damaging effect of actors' low felt-loved on destructive behavior, resulting in actors' destructive behavior mostly occurring when both actors' and partners' felt-loved was low. This dyadic pattern also emerged in three supplemental daily sampling studies. Providing directional support for the <i>strong-link/mutual felt-unloved</i> pattern, in Studies 4 and 5 involving two or more sequential interactions, Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved in one interaction predicted actors' destructive behavior within couples' subsequent conflict interactions. The results illustrate the dyadic nature of feeling loved: Partners feeling loved can protect against actors feeling unloved in challenging interactions. Assessing Actor × Partner effects should be equally valuable for advancing understanding of other fundamentally dyadic relationship processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"volume\":\"125 2\",\"pages\":\"367-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000419\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

感觉被爱(被爱、被关心、被接受、被重视、被理解)本质上是二元的,但大多数先前的理论观点和调查都集中在演员感觉(不)被爱如何影响演员的结果。采用二元视角,本研究测试了演员感觉不被爱和破坏性(批评、敌对)行为之间的既定联系是否取决于伴侣的被爱感觉。被爱的感觉需要是相互的,以减少破坏性行为吗?还是被爱的伴侣可以补偿不被爱的行为者?在五项二元观察性研究中,记录了夫妻讨论冲突、不同的偏好或关系优势,或与孩子互动(N = 842对夫妇;1965互动)。参与者报告了他们在每次互动中感受到的爱的程度,独立编码员评估了每个人表现出的破坏性行为的程度。重要参与者与伴侣的“被爱”互动呈现出一种强联结/相互感觉不被爱的模式:伴侣的高感觉被爱缓冲了参与者的低感觉被爱对破坏性行为的破坏性影响,导致参与者的破坏性行为主要发生在参与者和伴侣的“被爱”都很低的情况下。这种二元模式也出现在三个补充每日抽样研究。在研究4和5中,涉及两个或多个连续互动的强链接/相互感觉不被爱模式提供了方向性支持,参与者x伴侣在一次互动中的感觉被爱预测了参与者在夫妻后续冲突互动中的破坏性行为。研究结果说明了感觉被爱的二元性:感觉被爱的伴侣可以防止在具有挑战性的互动中感到不被爱的参与者。评估行动者×伙伴效应对于促进对其他基本二元关系过程的理解同样有价值。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeling loved as a strong link in relationship interactions: Partners who feel loved may buffer destructive behavior by actors who feel unloved.

Feeling loved (loved, cared for, accepted, valued, understood) is inherently dyadic, yet most prior theoretical perspectives and investigations have focused on how actors feeling (un)loved shapes actors' outcomes. Adopting a dyadic perspective, the present research tested whether the established links between actors feeling unloved and destructive (critical, hostile) behavior depended on partners' feelings of being loved. Does feeling loved need to be mutual to reduce destructive behavior, or can partners feeling loved compensate for actors feeling unloved? In five dyadic observational studies, couples were recorded discussing conflicts, diverging preferences or relationship strengths, or interacting with their child (total N = 842 couples; 1,965 interactions). Participants reported how much they felt loved during each interaction and independent coders rated how much each person exhibited destructive behavior. Significant Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved interactions revealed a strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern: partners' high felt-loved buffered the damaging effect of actors' low felt-loved on destructive behavior, resulting in actors' destructive behavior mostly occurring when both actors' and partners' felt-loved was low. This dyadic pattern also emerged in three supplemental daily sampling studies. Providing directional support for the strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern, in Studies 4 and 5 involving two or more sequential interactions, Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved in one interaction predicted actors' destructive behavior within couples' subsequent conflict interactions. The results illustrate the dyadic nature of feeling loved: Partners feeling loved can protect against actors feeling unloved in challenging interactions. Assessing Actor × Partner effects should be equally valuable for advancing understanding of other fundamentally dyadic relationship processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信