[老年人使用技术:60 岁以上老年人在接受、能力、控制、兴趣和社会指标之间的关联]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drin Ferizaj, Luis Perotti, Rebecca Dahms, Anika Heimann-Steinert
{"title":"[老年人使用技术:60 岁以上老年人在接受、能力、控制、兴趣和社会指标之间的关联]。","authors":"Drin Ferizaj, Luis Perotti, Rebecca Dahms, Anika Heimann-Steinert","doi":"10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, such as technology acceptance and competence play an important role in technology use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the associations between technology use, sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, and technology interest.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected from 585 study participants aged over 60 years from 14 surveys conducted between 2014 and 2020. A structural equation model was used to explain the relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural equation model with covariates of survey year, age, gender, and education (n = 585) yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.918, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.894, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.056 [95 % confidence interval: 0.050-0.063], Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.079, χ2 = 3051.936 (p < 0.001), χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 18.499. The strongest associations with technology use were found for technology acceptance and competence. Additionally, technology competence showed a significant association with technology interest. Gender and technology interest were not related to technology use but it was observed that men had higher levels of technology acceptance, control, competence, and interest.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Taking technology competence beliefs into account plays a crucial role in understanding the technology usage and interest of older individuals. Additionally, gender-specific differences in the theoretical constructs of action and interest in technology have been revealed in the context of the digital divide.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"227-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Use of technology in old age: associations between acceptance, competence, control, interest and social indicators in individuals over 60 years old].\",\"authors\":\"Drin Ferizaj, Luis Perotti, Rebecca Dahms, Anika Heimann-Steinert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, such as technology acceptance and competence play an important role in technology use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the associations between technology use, sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, and technology interest.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected from 585 study participants aged over 60 years from 14 surveys conducted between 2014 and 2020. A structural equation model was used to explain the relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural equation model with covariates of survey year, age, gender, and education (n = 585) yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.918, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.894, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.056 [95 % confidence interval: 0.050-0.063], Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.079, χ2 = 3051.936 (p < 0.001), χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 18.499. The strongest associations with technology use were found for technology acceptance and competence. Additionally, technology competence showed a significant association with technology interest. Gender and technology interest were not related to technology use but it was observed that men had higher levels of technology acceptance, control, competence, and interest.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Taking technology competence beliefs into account plays a crucial role in understanding the technology usage and interest of older individuals. Additionally, gender-specific differences in the theoretical constructs of action and interest in technology have been revealed in the context of the digital divide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"227-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除了社会人口因素外,行动理论建构,如技术接受度和能力,在技术使用中发挥着重要作用:除了社会人口学因素外,行动理论建构,如技术接受度和能力,在技术使用中发挥着重要作用:本研究旨在探讨技术使用、社会人口学因素、行动理论建构和技术兴趣之间的关联:从 2014 年至 2020 年期间进行的 14 次调查中收集了 585 名 60 岁以上研究参与者的数据。采用结构方程模型解释两者之间的关系:带有调查年份、年龄、性别和教育程度协变量(n = 585)的结构方程模型得出了以下拟合指数:比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.918,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)= 0.894,均方根近似误差 (RMSEA) = 0.056 [95 % 置信区间:0.050-0.063],标准化均方根残差 (SRMR) = 0.079,χ2 = 3051.936 (p 讨论):考虑技术能力信念对于理解老年人的技术使用和兴趣至关重要。此外,在数字鸿沟的背景下,技术行动和技术兴趣理论建构中的性别差异也得到了揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Use of technology in old age: associations between acceptance, competence, control, interest and social indicators in individuals over 60 years old].

Background: In addition to sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, such as technology acceptance and competence play an important role in technology use.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the associations between technology use, sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, and technology interest.

Material and methods: Data were collected from 585 study participants aged over 60 years from 14 surveys conducted between 2014 and 2020. A structural equation model was used to explain the relationships.

Results: The structural equation model with covariates of survey year, age, gender, and education (n = 585) yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.918, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.894, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.056 [95 % confidence interval: 0.050-0.063], Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.079, χ2 = 3051.936 (p < 0.001), χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 18.499. The strongest associations with technology use were found for technology acceptance and competence. Additionally, technology competence showed a significant association with technology interest. Gender and technology interest were not related to technology use but it was observed that men had higher levels of technology acceptance, control, competence, and interest.

Discussion: Taking technology competence beliefs into account plays a crucial role in understanding the technology usage and interest of older individuals. Additionally, gender-specific differences in the theoretical constructs of action and interest in technology have been revealed in the context of the digital divide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信