生物安全研究路线图:寻找支持人类和兽医实验室实践的证据。

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stuart D Blacksell, Sandhya Dhawan, Marina Kusumoto, Kim Khanh Le, Kathrin Summermatter, Joseph O'Keefe, Joseph Kozlovac, Salama Suhail Almuhairi, Indrawati Sendow, Christina M Scheel, Anthony Ahumibe, Zibusiso M Masuku, Allan M Bennett, Kazunobu Kojima, David R Harper, Keith Hamilton
{"title":"生物安全研究路线图:寻找支持人类和兽医实验室实践的证据。","authors":"Stuart D Blacksell,&nbsp;Sandhya Dhawan,&nbsp;Marina Kusumoto,&nbsp;Kim Khanh Le,&nbsp;Kathrin Summermatter,&nbsp;Joseph O'Keefe,&nbsp;Joseph Kozlovac,&nbsp;Salama Suhail Almuhairi,&nbsp;Indrawati Sendow,&nbsp;Christina M Scheel,&nbsp;Anthony Ahumibe,&nbsp;Zibusiso M Masuku,&nbsp;Allan M Bennett,&nbsp;Kazunobu Kojima,&nbsp;David R Harper,&nbsp;Keith Hamilton","doi":"10.1089/apb.2022.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lack of evidence-based information regarding potential biological risks can result in inappropriate or excessive biosafety and biosecurity risk-reduction strategies. This can cause unnecessary damage and loss to the physical facilities, physical and psychological well-being of laboratory staff, and community trust. A technical working group from the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), World Health Organization (WHO), and Chatham House collaborated on the Biosafety Research Roadmap (BRM) project. The goal of the BRM is the sustainable implementation of evidence-based biorisk management of laboratory activities, particularly in low-resource settings, and the identification of gaps in the current biosafety and biosecurity knowledge base.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted for the basis of laboratory design and practices for four selected high-priority subgroups of pathogenic agents. Potential gaps in biosafety were focused on five main sections, including the route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, laboratory-acquired infections, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies. Categories representing miscellaneous, respiratory, bioterrorism/zoonotic, and viral hemorrhagic fever pathogens were created within each group were selected for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information sheets on the pathogens were developed. Critical gaps in the evidence base for safe sustainable biorisk management were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The gap analysis identified areas of applied biosafety research required to support the safety, and the sustainability, of global research programs. Improving the data available for biorisk management decisions for research with high-priority pathogens will contribute significantly to the improvement and development of appropriate and necessary biosafety, biocontainment and biosecurity strategies for each agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"28 2","pages":"64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277988/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in Human and Veterinary Laboratories.\",\"authors\":\"Stuart D Blacksell,&nbsp;Sandhya Dhawan,&nbsp;Marina Kusumoto,&nbsp;Kim Khanh Le,&nbsp;Kathrin Summermatter,&nbsp;Joseph O'Keefe,&nbsp;Joseph Kozlovac,&nbsp;Salama Suhail Almuhairi,&nbsp;Indrawati Sendow,&nbsp;Christina M Scheel,&nbsp;Anthony Ahumibe,&nbsp;Zibusiso M Masuku,&nbsp;Allan M Bennett,&nbsp;Kazunobu Kojima,&nbsp;David R Harper,&nbsp;Keith Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apb.2022.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lack of evidence-based information regarding potential biological risks can result in inappropriate or excessive biosafety and biosecurity risk-reduction strategies. This can cause unnecessary damage and loss to the physical facilities, physical and psychological well-being of laboratory staff, and community trust. A technical working group from the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), World Health Organization (WHO), and Chatham House collaborated on the Biosafety Research Roadmap (BRM) project. The goal of the BRM is the sustainable implementation of evidence-based biorisk management of laboratory activities, particularly in low-resource settings, and the identification of gaps in the current biosafety and biosecurity knowledge base.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted for the basis of laboratory design and practices for four selected high-priority subgroups of pathogenic agents. Potential gaps in biosafety were focused on five main sections, including the route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, laboratory-acquired infections, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies. Categories representing miscellaneous, respiratory, bioterrorism/zoonotic, and viral hemorrhagic fever pathogens were created within each group were selected for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information sheets on the pathogens were developed. Critical gaps in the evidence base for safe sustainable biorisk management were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The gap analysis identified areas of applied biosafety research required to support the safety, and the sustainability, of global research programs. Improving the data available for biorisk management decisions for research with high-priority pathogens will contribute significantly to the improvement and development of appropriate and necessary biosafety, biocontainment and biosecurity strategies for each agent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"64-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

缺乏关于潜在生物风险的循证信息可能导致不适当或过度的生物安全和生物安全风险降低战略。这可能对物理设施、实验室工作人员的身心健康以及社区信任造成不必要的损害和损失。世界动物卫生组织(WOAH)、世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和查塔姆研究所的一个技术工作组就生物安全研究路线图项目进行了合作。BRM的目标是可持续地实施实验室活动的循证生物风险管理,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,并确定当前生物安全和生物安全知识库中的差距。方法:通过文献检索,为选定的4个高优先级病原体亚群的实验室设计和实践提供依据。生物安全方面的潜在差距集中在五个主要方面,包括接种途径/传播方式、感染剂量、实验室获得性感染、控制释放以及消毒和去污战略。代表杂项、呼吸道、生物恐怖/人畜共患和病毒性出血热病原体的类别在每一组中被选中进行审查。结果:制作了病原菌信息表。确定了安全可持续生物风险管理证据基础中的关键空白。结论:差距分析确定了支持全球研究计划的安全性和可持续性所需的应用生物安全研究领域。改善对高优先级病原体进行研究的生物风险管理决策的可用数据将大大有助于改进和制定针对每种病原体的适当和必要的生物安全、生物遏制和生物安全战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in Human and Veterinary Laboratories.

Introduction: Lack of evidence-based information regarding potential biological risks can result in inappropriate or excessive biosafety and biosecurity risk-reduction strategies. This can cause unnecessary damage and loss to the physical facilities, physical and psychological well-being of laboratory staff, and community trust. A technical working group from the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), World Health Organization (WHO), and Chatham House collaborated on the Biosafety Research Roadmap (BRM) project. The goal of the BRM is the sustainable implementation of evidence-based biorisk management of laboratory activities, particularly in low-resource settings, and the identification of gaps in the current biosafety and biosecurity knowledge base.

Methods: A literature search was conducted for the basis of laboratory design and practices for four selected high-priority subgroups of pathogenic agents. Potential gaps in biosafety were focused on five main sections, including the route of inoculation/modes of transmission, infectious dose, laboratory-acquired infections, containment releases, and disinfection and decontamination strategies. Categories representing miscellaneous, respiratory, bioterrorism/zoonotic, and viral hemorrhagic fever pathogens were created within each group were selected for review.

Results: Information sheets on the pathogens were developed. Critical gaps in the evidence base for safe sustainable biorisk management were identified.

Conclusion: The gap analysis identified areas of applied biosafety research required to support the safety, and the sustainability, of global research programs. Improving the data available for biorisk management decisions for research with high-priority pathogens will contribute significantly to the improvement and development of appropriate and necessary biosafety, biocontainment and biosecurity strategies for each agent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信