评估老年病学住院会诊服务中初级医学学习者的临床虚弱量表得分。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2023.2253180
M Lovett, P Koto, N Shetty
{"title":"评估老年病学住院会诊服务中初级医学学习者的临床虚弱量表得分。","authors":"M Lovett, P Koto, N Shetty","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2023.2253180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is incorporated into our institution's comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGAs and CFS scoring are completed by junior medical trainees on the Geriatric consult service. The agreement between CFS score assignment by junior trainees and Geriatrics trained individuals in this setting is unknown. Importantly, these scores assign a frailty level that impacts care pathways. We conducted a retrospective chart review from April-June 2019. A Geriatric medicine subspecialty resident assigned retrospective CFS scores based on data from the CGA. We compared scores to determine the level of agreement using the Cohen and Conger's Kappa inter-rater agreement metric and assessed whether patient characteristics influenced the likelihood of agreement between raters using a generalized linear model. Medical students assessed 43% (46/108) of patients (n = 13), and 57% (62/108) were assessed by PGY1s (n = 10). Inter-rater agreement measures showed substantial agreement overall and for PGY1s, but dropped to a moderate agreement for medical students. The retrospective inter-rater agreement of the CFS showed substantial agreement overall and decreased when limited to medical students, highlighting the need for interventions to improve the understanding of frailty early in medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"505-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing clinical frailty scale scoring by junior medical learners on an inpatient geriatrics consultation service.\",\"authors\":\"M Lovett, P Koto, N Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2023.2253180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is incorporated into our institution's comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGAs and CFS scoring are completed by junior medical trainees on the Geriatric consult service. The agreement between CFS score assignment by junior trainees and Geriatrics trained individuals in this setting is unknown. Importantly, these scores assign a frailty level that impacts care pathways. We conducted a retrospective chart review from April-June 2019. A Geriatric medicine subspecialty resident assigned retrospective CFS scores based on data from the CGA. We compared scores to determine the level of agreement using the Cohen and Conger's Kappa inter-rater agreement metric and assessed whether patient characteristics influenced the likelihood of agreement between raters using a generalized linear model. Medical students assessed 43% (46/108) of patients (n = 13), and 57% (62/108) were assessed by PGY1s (n = 10). Inter-rater agreement measures showed substantial agreement overall and for PGY1s, but dropped to a moderate agreement for medical students. The retrospective inter-rater agreement of the CFS showed substantial agreement overall and decreased when limited to medical students, highlighting the need for interventions to improve the understanding of frailty early in medical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"505-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2253180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2253180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床虚弱量表(CFS)被纳入我院的综合老年评估(CGA)。CGAs和CFS评分由老年咨询服务的初级医学实习生完成。在这种情况下,初级受训人员和老年病学培训人员的CFS评分分配是否一致尚不清楚。重要的是,这些分数分配了影响护理途径的脆弱水平。我们从2019年4月至6月进行了回顾性图表审查。一名老年医学专科住院医师根据CGA的数据分配了回顾性CFS评分。我们使用Cohen和Conger的Kappa评分间一致性度量来比较评分以确定一致性水平,并使用广义线性模型评估患者特征是否影响评分者之间一致性的可能性。医学生评估43%(46/108)的患者(n = 13), 57%(62/108)的患者采用PGY1s评估(n = 10)。评分者之间的一致度测量显示,总体上和pgy1年级学生之间的一致度相当高,但在医学生之间的一致度下降到中等水平。CFS的回顾性评分者之间的一致性总体上显示出很大的一致性,当仅限于医学生时,一致性降低,这突出了在医学培训早期进行干预以提高对虚弱的理解的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing clinical frailty scale scoring by junior medical learners on an inpatient geriatrics consultation service.

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is incorporated into our institution's comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGAs and CFS scoring are completed by junior medical trainees on the Geriatric consult service. The agreement between CFS score assignment by junior trainees and Geriatrics trained individuals in this setting is unknown. Importantly, these scores assign a frailty level that impacts care pathways. We conducted a retrospective chart review from April-June 2019. A Geriatric medicine subspecialty resident assigned retrospective CFS scores based on data from the CGA. We compared scores to determine the level of agreement using the Cohen and Conger's Kappa inter-rater agreement metric and assessed whether patient characteristics influenced the likelihood of agreement between raters using a generalized linear model. Medical students assessed 43% (46/108) of patients (n = 13), and 57% (62/108) were assessed by PGY1s (n = 10). Inter-rater agreement measures showed substantial agreement overall and for PGY1s, but dropped to a moderate agreement for medical students. The retrospective inter-rater agreement of the CFS showed substantial agreement overall and decreased when limited to medical students, highlighting the need for interventions to improve the understanding of frailty early in medical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信