Zara Waldman DeLuca, Richard G Schwartz, Klara Marton, Derek M Houston, Elizabeth Ying, Susan Steinman, Georgia Drakopoulou
{"title":"句子长度对人工耳蜗植入儿童问题理解能力的影响。","authors":"Zara Waldman DeLuca, Richard G Schwartz, Klara Marton, Derek M Houston, Elizabeth Ying, Susan Steinman, Georgia Drakopoulou","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2136591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study investigated the comprehension of subject and object <i>who</i> and <i>which</i> questions in children with cochlear implants (CI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Growth Curve Analysis (GCA) was used to compare eye gaze fixations and gaze patterns to the appropriate subject or object nouns within a four-picture array between 16 children with CI and 31 children with typical hearing (aged 7;0-12;0) on wh-questions with and without added adjectives to increase length. Offline accuracy was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated children with typical hearing exhibited more fixations to the target noun across all conditions, supporting higher comprehension accuracy. Both groups of children demonstrated more fixations to the target noun in object questions and questions without added length. Patterns of eye movement were significantly different between groups, suggesting different patterns of eye gaze across the array before fixation on the target noun. Children with CI exhibited fewer fixations, slower speed to fixation, and differences in gaze patterns that may imply the presence of processing limitations. Error analyses also suggested that children with CI frequently fixated on a picture similar to the target noun.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate children with CI comprehend questions more slowly than their hearing peers, which may be related to limitations in working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 1","pages":"14-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of sentence length on question comprehension in children with cochlear implants.\",\"authors\":\"Zara Waldman DeLuca, Richard G Schwartz, Klara Marton, Derek M Houston, Elizabeth Ying, Susan Steinman, Georgia Drakopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2022.2136591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study investigated the comprehension of subject and object <i>who</i> and <i>which</i> questions in children with cochlear implants (CI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Growth Curve Analysis (GCA) was used to compare eye gaze fixations and gaze patterns to the appropriate subject or object nouns within a four-picture array between 16 children with CI and 31 children with typical hearing (aged 7;0-12;0) on wh-questions with and without added adjectives to increase length. Offline accuracy was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated children with typical hearing exhibited more fixations to the target noun across all conditions, supporting higher comprehension accuracy. Both groups of children demonstrated more fixations to the target noun in object questions and questions without added length. Patterns of eye movement were significantly different between groups, suggesting different patterns of eye gaze across the array before fixation on the target noun. Children with CI exhibited fewer fixations, slower speed to fixation, and differences in gaze patterns that may imply the presence of processing limitations. Error analyses also suggested that children with CI frequently fixated on a picture similar to the target noun.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate children with CI comprehend questions more slowly than their hearing peers, which may be related to limitations in working memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"14-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324470/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2136591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2136591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究调查了人工耳蜗(CI)儿童对主语和宾语 "谁 "和 "哪个 "问题的理解能力:方法:使用生长曲线分析法(GCA)比较了16名CI儿童和31名典型听力儿童(7;0-12;0岁)在有和没有添加形容词以增加长度的Wh-questions上的眼睛注视固定和注视四图阵列中适当的主语或宾语名词的模式。同时还比较了离线准确性:结果:研究结果表明,在所有条件下,具有典型听力的儿童对目标名词表现出更多的固着,从而支持了更高的理解准确性。在宾语问题和没有增加长度的问题中,两组儿童都对目标名词表现出了更多的固着。两组儿童的眼球运动模式有显著差异,这表明在定格在目标名词之前,他们在整个阵列中的眼球注视模式是不同的。有 CI 的儿童表现出较少的凝视、较慢的凝视速度以及凝视模式的差异,这可能意味着存在加工限制。误差分析还表明,CI 儿童经常将视线定格在与目标名词相似的图片上:结果表明,听障儿童理解问题的速度比健听儿童慢,这可能与工作记忆的局限性有关。
The effect of sentence length on question comprehension in children with cochlear implants.
Objectives: The present study investigated the comprehension of subject and object who and which questions in children with cochlear implants (CI).
Methods: Growth Curve Analysis (GCA) was used to compare eye gaze fixations and gaze patterns to the appropriate subject or object nouns within a four-picture array between 16 children with CI and 31 children with typical hearing (aged 7;0-12;0) on wh-questions with and without added adjectives to increase length. Offline accuracy was also compared.
Results: Findings indicated children with typical hearing exhibited more fixations to the target noun across all conditions, supporting higher comprehension accuracy. Both groups of children demonstrated more fixations to the target noun in object questions and questions without added length. Patterns of eye movement were significantly different between groups, suggesting different patterns of eye gaze across the array before fixation on the target noun. Children with CI exhibited fewer fixations, slower speed to fixation, and differences in gaze patterns that may imply the presence of processing limitations. Error analyses also suggested that children with CI frequently fixated on a picture similar to the target noun.
Conclusions: Results indicate children with CI comprehend questions more slowly than their hearing peers, which may be related to limitations in working memory.
期刊介绍:
Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.