防漏PDBBind:蛋白质配体复合物的重组数据集,用于更通用的结合亲和力预测。

ArXiv Pub Date : 2024-05-03
Jie Li, Xingyi Guan, Oufan Zhang, Kunyang Sun, Yingze Wang, Dorian Bagni, Teresa Head-Gordon
{"title":"防漏PDBBind:蛋白质配体复合物的重组数据集,用于更通用的结合亲和力预测。","authors":"Jie Li, Xingyi Guan, Oufan Zhang, Kunyang Sun, Yingze Wang, Dorian Bagni, Teresa Head-Gordon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many physics-based and machine-learned scoring functions (SFs) used to predict protein-ligand binding free energies have been trained on the PDBBind dataset. However, it is controversial as to whether new SFs are actually improving since the general, refined, and core datasets of PDBBind are cross-contaminated with proteins and ligands with high similarity, and hence they may not perform comparably well in binding prediction of new protein-ligand complexes. In this work we have carefully prepared a cleaned PDBBind data set of non-covalent binders that are split into training, validation, and test datasets to control for data leakage, defined as proteins and ligands with high sequence and structural similarity. The resulting leak-proof (LP)-PDBBind data is used to retrain four popular SFs: AutoDock Vina, Random Forest (RF)-Score, InteractionGraphNet (IGN), and DeepDTA, to better test their capabilities when applied to new protein-ligand complexes. In particular we have formulated a new independent data set, BDB2020+, by matching high quality binding free energies from BindingDB with co-crystalized ligand-protein complexes from the PDB that have been deposited since 2020. Based on all the benchmark results, the retrained models using LP-PDBBind consistently perform better, with IGN especially being recommended for scoring and ranking applications for new protein-ligand systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8425,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Li, Xingyi Guan, Oufan Zhang, Kunyang Sun, Yingze Wang, Dorian Bagni, Teresa Head-Gordon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many physics-based and machine-learned scoring functions (SFs) used to predict protein-ligand binding free energies have been trained on the PDBBind dataset. However, it is controversial as to whether new SFs are actually improving since the general, refined, and core datasets of PDBBind are cross-contaminated with proteins and ligands with high similarity, and hence they may not perform comparably well in binding prediction of new protein-ligand complexes. In this work we have carefully prepared a cleaned PDBBind data set of non-covalent binders that are split into training, validation, and test datasets to control for data leakage, defined as proteins and ligands with high sequence and structural similarity. The resulting leak-proof (LP)-PDBBind data is used to retrain four popular SFs: AutoDock Vina, Random Forest (RF)-Score, InteractionGraphNet (IGN), and DeepDTA, to better test their capabilities when applied to new protein-ligand complexes. In particular we have formulated a new independent data set, BDB2020+, by matching high quality binding free energies from BindingDB with co-crystalized ligand-protein complexes from the PDB that have been deposited since 2020. Based on all the benchmark results, the retrained models using LP-PDBBind consistently perform better, with IGN especially being recommended for scoring and ranking applications for new protein-ligand systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ArXiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ArXiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经在PDBBind数据集上训练了许多用于预测蛋白质配体结合自由能的基于物理和机器学习的评分函数(SF)。然而,对于新的SF是否真的在改善,这是有争议的,因为PDBBind的通用、精炼和核心数据集被具有高度相似性的蛋白质和配体交叉污染,因此它们在新的蛋白质-配体复合物的结合预测中可能表现得不太好。在这项工作中,我们仔细准备了一个非共价结合物的清洁PDBBind数据集,该数据集被划分为训练、验证和测试数据集,以控制数据泄露。由此产生的防漏(LP)-PDBBind数据用于重新训练四种流行的SF:AutoDock vina、Random Forest(RF)-Score、InteractionGraphNet(IGN)和DeepDTA,以更好地测试它们在应用于新的蛋白质-配体复合物时的能力。特别是,我们通过将BindingDB的高质量结合自由能与自2020年以来沉积的PDB的共结晶配体-蛋白质复合物相匹配,制定了一个新的独立数据集BDB2020+。基于所有的基准结果,使用依赖3D信息的LP PDBBind的再训练模型始终处于最佳状态,IGN尤其被推荐用于新蛋白质配体系统的评分和排名应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.

Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.

Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.

Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.

Many physics-based and machine-learned scoring functions (SFs) used to predict protein-ligand binding free energies have been trained on the PDBBind dataset. However, it is controversial as to whether new SFs are actually improving since the general, refined, and core datasets of PDBBind are cross-contaminated with proteins and ligands with high similarity, and hence they may not perform comparably well in binding prediction of new protein-ligand complexes. In this work we have carefully prepared a cleaned PDBBind data set of non-covalent binders that are split into training, validation, and test datasets to control for data leakage, defined as proteins and ligands with high sequence and structural similarity. The resulting leak-proof (LP)-PDBBind data is used to retrain four popular SFs: AutoDock Vina, Random Forest (RF)-Score, InteractionGraphNet (IGN), and DeepDTA, to better test their capabilities when applied to new protein-ligand complexes. In particular we have formulated a new independent data set, BDB2020+, by matching high quality binding free energies from BindingDB with co-crystalized ligand-protein complexes from the PDB that have been deposited since 2020. Based on all the benchmark results, the retrained models using LP-PDBBind consistently perform better, with IGN especially being recommended for scoring and ranking applications for new protein-ligand systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信