坦桑尼亚北部对 Cataldo 癌症耻辱感量表的文化适应和心理测量特性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2023.2241458
Brandon Knettel, Linda Minja, Elizabeth Msoka, Clotilda Tarimo, Victor Katiti, Wei Pan, Judith Mwobobia, Erika Juhlin, Elizabeth Knippler, Melissa Watt, Gita Suneja, Stephen Kimani, Dina Abouelella, Blandina Mmbaga, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
{"title":"坦桑尼亚北部对 Cataldo 癌症耻辱感量表的文化适应和心理测量特性。","authors":"Brandon Knettel, Linda Minja, Elizabeth Msoka, Clotilda Tarimo, Victor Katiti, Wei Pan, Judith Mwobobia, Erika Juhlin, Elizabeth Knippler, Melissa Watt, Gita Suneja, Stephen Kimani, Dina Abouelella, Blandina Mmbaga, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2023.2241458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related stigma impacts patients' emotional health, care engagement, and cancer outcomes, but few measures of cancer stigma exist. We culturally adapted and assessed psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale (CCSS) in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the CCSS short version (21 items), plus 12 locally-derived items, to 146 adult cancer patients. We conducted exploratory factor analysis, examined internal consistency/reliability, and assessed convergent validity with relevant measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a 17-item cancer stigma scale with strong psychometric properties and four subscales: enacted stigma, shame and blame, internalized stigma, and disclosure concerns. Stigma was rare except for disclosure concerns. Stigma was positively associated with depression and anxiety and negatively associated with social support, quality of life, and illness acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale provides valid, culturally-informed measurement of cancer stigma in Tanzania. Future studies should assess associations with care engagement, which will inform interventions to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"286-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10837313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally-informed adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale in Northern Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon Knettel, Linda Minja, Elizabeth Msoka, Clotilda Tarimo, Victor Katiti, Wei Pan, Judith Mwobobia, Erika Juhlin, Elizabeth Knippler, Melissa Watt, Gita Suneja, Stephen Kimani, Dina Abouelella, Blandina Mmbaga, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07347332.2023.2241458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related stigma impacts patients' emotional health, care engagement, and cancer outcomes, but few measures of cancer stigma exist. We culturally adapted and assessed psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale (CCSS) in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the CCSS short version (21 items), plus 12 locally-derived items, to 146 adult cancer patients. We conducted exploratory factor analysis, examined internal consistency/reliability, and assessed convergent validity with relevant measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a 17-item cancer stigma scale with strong psychometric properties and four subscales: enacted stigma, shame and blame, internalized stigma, and disclosure concerns. Stigma was rare except for disclosure concerns. Stigma was positively associated with depression and anxiety and negatively associated with social support, quality of life, and illness acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale provides valid, culturally-informed measurement of cancer stigma in Tanzania. Future studies should assess associations with care engagement, which will inform interventions to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"286-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10837313/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2241458\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2241458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与癌症相关的耻辱感会影响患者的情绪健康、护理参与度和癌症预后,但目前很少有癌症耻辱感的测量方法。我们在坦桑尼亚对 Cataldo 癌症耻辱感量表(CCSS)进行了文化改编并评估了其心理测量特性:我们对 146 名成年癌症患者施测了 CCSS 短版(21 个项目)和 12 个本地衍生项目。我们进行了探索性因子分析,检查了内部一致性/可靠性,并评估了与相关量表的收敛有效性:结果:我们确定了一个 17 个项目的癌症成见量表,该量表具有很强的心理测量特性和四个子量表:形成的成见、羞耻和自责、内化的成见以及对披露的担忧。除披露担忧外,成见是罕见的。成见与抑郁和焦虑呈正相关,与社会支持、生活质量和疾病接受度呈负相关:该量表提供了有效的、基于文化背景的坦桑尼亚癌症污名测量方法。未来的研究应评估与护理参与度的关系,这将为减少鄙视和改善治疗效果的干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culturally-informed adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale in Northern Tanzania.

Background: Cancer-related stigma impacts patients' emotional health, care engagement, and cancer outcomes, but few measures of cancer stigma exist. We culturally adapted and assessed psychometric properties of the Cataldo Cancer Stigma Scale (CCSS) in Tanzania.

Methods: We administered the CCSS short version (21 items), plus 12 locally-derived items, to 146 adult cancer patients. We conducted exploratory factor analysis, examined internal consistency/reliability, and assessed convergent validity with relevant measures.

Results: We identified a 17-item cancer stigma scale with strong psychometric properties and four subscales: enacted stigma, shame and blame, internalized stigma, and disclosure concerns. Stigma was rare except for disclosure concerns. Stigma was positively associated with depression and anxiety and negatively associated with social support, quality of life, and illness acceptance.

Conclusions: The scale provides valid, culturally-informed measurement of cancer stigma in Tanzania. Future studies should assess associations with care engagement, which will inform interventions to reduce stigma and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信