生命之外的生命:对死后器官捐赠的看法和捐赠同意——意大利的一项焦点小组研究。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sabrina Cipolletta, Silvia Caterina Maria Tomaino, Alessandra Brena, Paola Di Ciaccio, Margherita Gentile, Francesco Procaccio, Massimo Cardillo
{"title":"生命之外的生命:对死后器官捐赠的看法和捐赠同意——意大利的一项焦点小组研究。","authors":"Sabrina Cipolletta,&nbsp;Silvia Caterina Maria Tomaino,&nbsp;Alessandra Brena,&nbsp;Paola Di Ciaccio,&nbsp;Margherita Gentile,&nbsp;Francesco Procaccio,&nbsp;Massimo Cardillo","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Many factors such as personal and cultural beliefs, misinformation, fear of death and inadequate will registering procedures can influence post-mortem organ donation. The present study aimed to explore the perceptions, beliefs and information around post-mortem donation and will expression in different groups of the Italian population, to orient future interventions and raise awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative research with focus groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 38 focus groups involving 353 participants including the general population (young adults: 18–39, mature adults: 40–70), local and hospital health professionals, critical area health professionals (emergency room and intensive care), registry office employees and opinion leaders, were conducted in six regions from different parts of Italy between June and November 2021. Thematic analysis was conducted with the use of Atlas.ti9.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five overarching themes were identified: dilemmas regarding donation, resistance to donation, facilitators of donation, difficulties in terms of will expression and proposals to encourage will expression. Possible facilitators were having personal and professional experiences with organ donation, feeling useful for society, having reliable information and trust in the health care system. Potential barriers to donation were doubts and fears about brain death, bodily integrity concerns, religious beliefs, misinformation and distrust in the health care system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlighted the significance of a bottom-up perspective with regard to identifying the personal perceptions and beliefs with regard to donation, underlining the urgency of creating tailored interventions to sensitize different groups of the population in terms of promoting an informed choice and a culture of donation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"28 4","pages":"1222-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12681","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life beyond life: Perceptions of post-mortem organ donation and consent to donate—A focus group study in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Cipolletta,&nbsp;Silvia Caterina Maria Tomaino,&nbsp;Alessandra Brena,&nbsp;Paola Di Ciaccio,&nbsp;Margherita Gentile,&nbsp;Francesco Procaccio,&nbsp;Massimo Cardillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Many factors such as personal and cultural beliefs, misinformation, fear of death and inadequate will registering procedures can influence post-mortem organ donation. The present study aimed to explore the perceptions, beliefs and information around post-mortem donation and will expression in different groups of the Italian population, to orient future interventions and raise awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative research with focus groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 38 focus groups involving 353 participants including the general population (young adults: 18–39, mature adults: 40–70), local and hospital health professionals, critical area health professionals (emergency room and intensive care), registry office employees and opinion leaders, were conducted in six regions from different parts of Italy between June and November 2021. Thematic analysis was conducted with the use of Atlas.ti9.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five overarching themes were identified: dilemmas regarding donation, resistance to donation, facilitators of donation, difficulties in terms of will expression and proposals to encourage will expression. Possible facilitators were having personal and professional experiences with organ donation, feeling useful for society, having reliable information and trust in the health care system. Potential barriers to donation were doubts and fears about brain death, bodily integrity concerns, religious beliefs, misinformation and distrust in the health care system.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results highlighted the significance of a bottom-up perspective with regard to identifying the personal perceptions and beliefs with regard to donation, underlining the urgency of creating tailored interventions to sensitize different groups of the population in terms of promoting an informed choice and a culture of donation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"1222-1240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12681\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多因素,如个人和文化信仰、错误信息、对死亡的恐惧和遗嘱登记程序不足,都会影响尸检器官捐献。本研究旨在探讨意大利不同人群对尸检捐赠的看法、信念和信息,以及意愿的表达,以确定未来的干预措施并提高人们的认识。设计:与焦点小组进行定性研究。方法:2021年6月至11月,共有38个重点小组,涉及353名参与者,包括普通人群(年轻人:18-39人,成年人:40-70人)、当地和医院卫生专业人员、关键区域卫生专业人员(急诊室和重症监护室)、登记处员工和意见领袖,在意大利不同地区的六个地区进行了调查。使用Atlas.ti9进行了主题分析。结果:确定了五个总体主题:关于捐赠的困境、对捐赠的抵制、捐赠的促进者、意愿表达方面的困难以及鼓励意愿表达的建议。可能的促进者是有器官捐赠的个人和专业经验,对社会有用,有可靠的信息和对医疗保健系统的信任。捐赠的潜在障碍是对脑死亡的怀疑和恐惧、身体完整性问题、宗教信仰、错误信息和对医疗保健系统的不信任。结论:这些结果强调了自下而上的视角在确定个人对捐赠的看法和信念方面的重要性,强调了制定有针对性的干预措施的紧迫性,以提高不同人群在促进知情选择和捐赠文化方面的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Life beyond life: Perceptions of post-mortem organ donation and consent to donate—A focus group study in Italy

Life beyond life: Perceptions of post-mortem organ donation and consent to donate—A focus group study in Italy

Objectives

Many factors such as personal and cultural beliefs, misinformation, fear of death and inadequate will registering procedures can influence post-mortem organ donation. The present study aimed to explore the perceptions, beliefs and information around post-mortem donation and will expression in different groups of the Italian population, to orient future interventions and raise awareness.

Design

Qualitative research with focus groups.

Methods

A total of 38 focus groups involving 353 participants including the general population (young adults: 18–39, mature adults: 40–70), local and hospital health professionals, critical area health professionals (emergency room and intensive care), registry office employees and opinion leaders, were conducted in six regions from different parts of Italy between June and November 2021. Thematic analysis was conducted with the use of Atlas.ti9.

Results

Five overarching themes were identified: dilemmas regarding donation, resistance to donation, facilitators of donation, difficulties in terms of will expression and proposals to encourage will expression. Possible facilitators were having personal and professional experiences with organ donation, feeling useful for society, having reliable information and trust in the health care system. Potential barriers to donation were doubts and fears about brain death, bodily integrity concerns, religious beliefs, misinformation and distrust in the health care system.

Conclusions

These results highlighted the significance of a bottom-up perspective with regard to identifying the personal perceptions and beliefs with regard to donation, underlining the urgency of creating tailored interventions to sensitize different groups of the population in terms of promoting an informed choice and a culture of donation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信