阿育吠陀基础知识和科学——透视。

Ayu Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-02 DOI:10.4103/ayu.ayu_36_23
Basavaraj Ramappa Tubaki, Buduru Sreenivasa Prasad
{"title":"阿育吠陀基础知识和科学——透视。","authors":"Basavaraj Ramappa Tubaki, Buduru Sreenivasa Prasad","doi":"10.4103/ayu.ayu_36_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western medicine was a complementary and alternative system of medicine (CAM) to Ayurveda in India in the 19th century. In the 20th century perspectives reversed with the exponential growth of knowledge through scientific approaches in all fields and in turn contributing to each other’s growth. Currently, there is renewed interest in CAM. A survey published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that 33% of Americans regularly used these practices and paid them out of pocket. The number of visits to CAM practitioners was more than visits to all primary care physicians.[1] All suggesting a hidden mainstream. Such events increased interest and scientific scrutiny of CAM. Many leading scientists termed CAM, a fraudulent and unscientific practice.[2] All along skeptics upped their attack on efforts on CAM like funding, research and demanding research methods like randomized, placebo‐controlled trials (though these designs may not fit well with CAM philosophies). Research to sync with Western scientific thoughts became reductionist and mechanistic even by CAM practitioners doing research. There was a drop in funding for fundamental concepts in CAM systems such as vitalism, holism, bioenergy approaches, complexity, and component synergy.[3] A recent article[4] by a professor in Ayurveda questioned the Ayurveda fundamentals as science or pseudo‐science, refutable or nonfalsifiable, and their utility in current times. And opined them to be dropped from the syllabus and need not be taught to undergraduate students. Questioned the concept of Tridosha, Dhatu concept, especially of Rakta and Shukra Dhatu.","PeriodicalId":8720,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/cc/AYU-43-65.PMC10468022.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ayurveda fundamentals and science - A perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Basavaraj Ramappa Tubaki, Buduru Sreenivasa Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ayu.ayu_36_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Western medicine was a complementary and alternative system of medicine (CAM) to Ayurveda in India in the 19th century. In the 20th century perspectives reversed with the exponential growth of knowledge through scientific approaches in all fields and in turn contributing to each other’s growth. Currently, there is renewed interest in CAM. A survey published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that 33% of Americans regularly used these practices and paid them out of pocket. The number of visits to CAM practitioners was more than visits to all primary care physicians.[1] All suggesting a hidden mainstream. Such events increased interest and scientific scrutiny of CAM. Many leading scientists termed CAM, a fraudulent and unscientific practice.[2] All along skeptics upped their attack on efforts on CAM like funding, research and demanding research methods like randomized, placebo‐controlled trials (though these designs may not fit well with CAM philosophies). Research to sync with Western scientific thoughts became reductionist and mechanistic even by CAM practitioners doing research. There was a drop in funding for fundamental concepts in CAM systems such as vitalism, holism, bioenergy approaches, complexity, and component synergy.[3] A recent article[4] by a professor in Ayurveda questioned the Ayurveda fundamentals as science or pseudo‐science, refutable or nonfalsifiable, and their utility in current times. And opined them to be dropped from the syllabus and need not be taught to undergraduate students. Questioned the concept of Tridosha, Dhatu concept, especially of Rakta and Shukra Dhatu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ayu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/cc/AYU-43-65.PMC10468022.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ayu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.ayu_36_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.ayu_36_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ayurveda fundamentals and science - A perspective.
Western medicine was a complementary and alternative system of medicine (CAM) to Ayurveda in India in the 19th century. In the 20th century perspectives reversed with the exponential growth of knowledge through scientific approaches in all fields and in turn contributing to each other’s growth. Currently, there is renewed interest in CAM. A survey published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that 33% of Americans regularly used these practices and paid them out of pocket. The number of visits to CAM practitioners was more than visits to all primary care physicians.[1] All suggesting a hidden mainstream. Such events increased interest and scientific scrutiny of CAM. Many leading scientists termed CAM, a fraudulent and unscientific practice.[2] All along skeptics upped their attack on efforts on CAM like funding, research and demanding research methods like randomized, placebo‐controlled trials (though these designs may not fit well with CAM philosophies). Research to sync with Western scientific thoughts became reductionist and mechanistic even by CAM practitioners doing research. There was a drop in funding for fundamental concepts in CAM systems such as vitalism, holism, bioenergy approaches, complexity, and component synergy.[3] A recent article[4] by a professor in Ayurveda questioned the Ayurveda fundamentals as science or pseudo‐science, refutable or nonfalsifiable, and their utility in current times. And opined them to be dropped from the syllabus and need not be taught to undergraduate students. Questioned the concept of Tridosha, Dhatu concept, especially of Rakta and Shukra Dhatu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信