分析正常鼻腔形态变化对嗅裂气味传输的影响。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Inhalation Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-31 DOI:10.1080/08958378.2022.2115175
Ryan M Sicard, Reanna Shah, Dennis O Frank-Ito
{"title":"分析正常鼻腔形态变化对嗅裂气味传输的影响。","authors":"Ryan M Sicard, Reanna Shah, Dennis O Frank-Ito","doi":"10.1080/08958378.2022.2115175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Olfaction requires a combination of sensorineural components and conductive components, but conductive mechanisms have not typically received much attention. This study investigates the role of normal nasal vestibule morphological variations in ten healthy subjects on odorant flux in the olfactory cleft.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Computed tomography images were used to create subject-specific nasal models. Each subject's unilateral nasal cavity was classified according to its nasal vestibule shape as Standard or Notched. Inspiratory airflow simulations were performed at 15 L/min, simulating resting inspiration using computational fluid dynamics modeling. Odorant transport simulations for three odorants (limonene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, and acetaldehyde) were then performed at concentrations of 200 ppm for limonene and acetaldehyde, and 0.2 ppm for dinitrotoluene. Olfactory cleft odorant flux was computed for each simulation.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion and conclusion: </strong>Simulated results showed airflow in the olfactory cleft was greater in the Standard phenotype compared to the Notched phenotype. For Standard, median airflow was greatest in the anterior region (0.5006 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.1009 L/min). Median airflow in Notched was greatest in the medial region (0.3267 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.0756 L/min). Median olfactory odorant flux for acetaldehyde and limonene was greater in Standard (Acetaldehyde: Standard = 140.45 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 122.20 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s. Limonene: Standard = 0.67 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 0.65 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s). Median dinitrotoluene flux was greater in Notched (Standard = 2.86 × 10<sup>-4</sup>pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 4.29 × 10<sup>-4</sup> pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s). The impact of nasal vestibule morphological variations on odorant flux at the olfactory cleft may have implications on individual differences in olfaction, which should be investigated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":13561,"journal":{"name":"Inhalation Toxicology","volume":"34 11-12","pages":"350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799026/pdf/nihms-1850059.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses on the influence of normal nasal morphological variations on odorant transport to the olfactory cleft.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan M Sicard, Reanna Shah, Dennis O Frank-Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08958378.2022.2115175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Olfaction requires a combination of sensorineural components and conductive components, but conductive mechanisms have not typically received much attention. This study investigates the role of normal nasal vestibule morphological variations in ten healthy subjects on odorant flux in the olfactory cleft.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Computed tomography images were used to create subject-specific nasal models. Each subject's unilateral nasal cavity was classified according to its nasal vestibule shape as Standard or Notched. Inspiratory airflow simulations were performed at 15 L/min, simulating resting inspiration using computational fluid dynamics modeling. Odorant transport simulations for three odorants (limonene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, and acetaldehyde) were then performed at concentrations of 200 ppm for limonene and acetaldehyde, and 0.2 ppm for dinitrotoluene. Olfactory cleft odorant flux was computed for each simulation.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion and conclusion: </strong>Simulated results showed airflow in the olfactory cleft was greater in the Standard phenotype compared to the Notched phenotype. For Standard, median airflow was greatest in the anterior region (0.5006 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.1009 L/min). Median airflow in Notched was greatest in the medial region (0.3267 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.0756 L/min). Median olfactory odorant flux for acetaldehyde and limonene was greater in Standard (Acetaldehyde: Standard = 140.45 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 122.20 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s. Limonene: Standard = 0.67 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 0.65 pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s). Median dinitrotoluene flux was greater in Notched (Standard = 2.86 × 10<sup>-4</sup>pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s; Notched = 4.29 × 10<sup>-4</sup> pg/cm<sup>2</sup>-s). The impact of nasal vestibule morphological variations on odorant flux at the olfactory cleft may have implications on individual differences in olfaction, which should be investigated further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"34 11-12\",\"pages\":\"350-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799026/pdf/nihms-1850059.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2022.2115175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inhalation Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2022.2115175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:嗅觉需要感音元件和传导元件的结合,但传导机制通常未得到广泛关注。本研究调查了十名健康受试者的正常鼻前庭形态变化对嗅裂中气味通量的作用:计算机断层扫描图像用于创建特定受试者的鼻腔模型。每个受试者的单侧鼻腔根据其鼻前庭形状分为标准型和凹槽型。利用计算流体动力学模型模拟静息吸气,以 15 升/分钟的速度进行吸气气流模拟。然后对三种气味剂(柠檬烯、2,4-二硝基甲苯和乙醛)的气味传输进行模拟,柠檬烯和乙醛的浓度为 200 ppm,二硝基甲苯的浓度为 0.2 ppm。结果、讨论和结论:模拟结果显示,与缺口表型相比,标准表型的嗅裂气流更大。对于 "标准 "表型,前部区域的气流中值最大(0.5006 升/分钟),后部区域的气流中值最小(0.1009 升/分钟)。缺口型的气流中值在内侧区域最大(0.3267 升/分钟),在后部区域最小(0.0756 升/分钟)。乙醛和柠檬烯的嗅觉气味通量中值在 "标准 "中较大(乙醛:"标准"= 140.45 pg/cm2-s;"凹槽"= 122.20 pg/cm2-s。柠檬烯:标准 = 0.67 pg/cm2-s;缺口 = 0.65 pg/cm2-s)。Notched 的二硝基甲苯通量中值更大(标准 = 2.86 × 10-4 pg/cm2-s;Notched = 4.29 × 10-4 pg/cm2-s)。鼻前庭形态变化对嗅裂气味通量的影响可能会对嗅觉的个体差异产生影响,这有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analyses on the influence of normal nasal morphological variations on odorant transport to the olfactory cleft.

Analyses on the influence of normal nasal morphological variations on odorant transport to the olfactory cleft.

Objective: Olfaction requires a combination of sensorineural components and conductive components, but conductive mechanisms have not typically received much attention. This study investigates the role of normal nasal vestibule morphological variations in ten healthy subjects on odorant flux in the olfactory cleft.

Materials and methods: Computed tomography images were used to create subject-specific nasal models. Each subject's unilateral nasal cavity was classified according to its nasal vestibule shape as Standard or Notched. Inspiratory airflow simulations were performed at 15 L/min, simulating resting inspiration using computational fluid dynamics modeling. Odorant transport simulations for three odorants (limonene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, and acetaldehyde) were then performed at concentrations of 200 ppm for limonene and acetaldehyde, and 0.2 ppm for dinitrotoluene. Olfactory cleft odorant flux was computed for each simulation.

Results and discussion and conclusion: Simulated results showed airflow in the olfactory cleft was greater in the Standard phenotype compared to the Notched phenotype. For Standard, median airflow was greatest in the anterior region (0.5006 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.1009 L/min). Median airflow in Notched was greatest in the medial region (0.3267 L/min) and lowest in the posterior region (0.0756 L/min). Median olfactory odorant flux for acetaldehyde and limonene was greater in Standard (Acetaldehyde: Standard = 140.45 pg/cm2-s; Notched = 122.20 pg/cm2-s. Limonene: Standard = 0.67 pg/cm2-s; Notched = 0.65 pg/cm2-s). Median dinitrotoluene flux was greater in Notched (Standard = 2.86 × 10-4pg/cm2-s; Notched = 4.29 × 10-4 pg/cm2-s). The impact of nasal vestibule morphological variations on odorant flux at the olfactory cleft may have implications on individual differences in olfaction, which should be investigated further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inhalation Toxicology
Inhalation Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Inhalation Toxicology is a peer-reviewed publication providing a key forum for the latest accomplishments and advancements in concepts, approaches, and procedures presently being used to evaluate the health risk associated with airborne chemicals. The journal publishes original research, reviews, symposia, and workshop topics involving the respiratory system’s functions in health and disease, the pathogenesis and mechanism of injury, the extrapolation of animal data to humans, the effects of inhaled substances on extra-pulmonary systems, as well as reliable and innovative models for predicting human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信