复杂脊髓脂肪瘤的手术治疗现状:还在迷宫中航行吗?

Dachling Pang, Dominic N P Thompson
{"title":"复杂脊髓脂肪瘤的手术治疗现状:还在迷宫中航行吗?","authors":"Dachling Pang, Dominic N P Thompson","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-34981-2_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review summarises the classification, anatomy and embryogenesis of complex spinal cord lipomas and describes in some detail the technique of total lipoma resection and radical reconstruction of the affected neural placode. Its specific mission is to tackle two main issues surrounding the management of complex dysraphic lipomas: whether total resection confers better long-term benefits than partial resection and whether total resection does better than conservative treatment, i.e. no surgery, for asymptomatic lipomas. Accordingly, the 24-year progression-free survival data of the senior author and colleagues' series of over 300 cases of total resection are compared with historical data from multiple series (including our own) of partial resection, and total resection data specifically for asymptomatic lesions are compared with the two known series of non-surgical treatment of equivalent patients. These comparisons so far amply support the author's recommendation of total resection for most complex lipomas, with or without symptoms. The notable exception is the asymptomatic chaotic lipoma, whose peculiar anatomical relationship with the neural tissue defies even our aggressive surgical approach, and consequently projects worse results (admittedly of small number of cases) than for the other two lipoma subtypes of dorsal and transitional lesions. Prophylactic resection of asymptomatic chaotic lipomas is therefore not currently endorsed. We have also recently found that some dorsal lipomas with clear outline of the conus on preoperative imaging had a significantly better long-term prognosis of preserving neurourological functions without surgery. Whether this subset of lipomas should be managed conservatively until symptoms arise is now an open question awaiting a longer follow-up of a larger cohort of such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72077,"journal":{"name":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Current Status of the Surgical Management of Complex Spinal Cord Lipomas: Still Navigating the Labyrinth?\",\"authors\":\"Dachling Pang, Dominic N P Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-031-34981-2_6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review summarises the classification, anatomy and embryogenesis of complex spinal cord lipomas and describes in some detail the technique of total lipoma resection and radical reconstruction of the affected neural placode. Its specific mission is to tackle two main issues surrounding the management of complex dysraphic lipomas: whether total resection confers better long-term benefits than partial resection and whether total resection does better than conservative treatment, i.e. no surgery, for asymptomatic lipomas. Accordingly, the 24-year progression-free survival data of the senior author and colleagues' series of over 300 cases of total resection are compared with historical data from multiple series (including our own) of partial resection, and total resection data specifically for asymptomatic lesions are compared with the two known series of non-surgical treatment of equivalent patients. These comparisons so far amply support the author's recommendation of total resection for most complex lipomas, with or without symptoms. The notable exception is the asymptomatic chaotic lipoma, whose peculiar anatomical relationship with the neural tissue defies even our aggressive surgical approach, and consequently projects worse results (admittedly of small number of cases) than for the other two lipoma subtypes of dorsal and transitional lesions. Prophylactic resection of asymptomatic chaotic lipomas is therefore not currently endorsed. We have also recently found that some dorsal lipomas with clear outline of the conus on preoperative imaging had a significantly better long-term prognosis of preserving neurourological functions without surgery. Whether this subset of lipomas should be managed conservatively until symptoms arise is now an open question awaiting a longer follow-up of a larger cohort of such patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34981-2_6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34981-2_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述总结了复杂脊髓脂肪瘤的分类、解剖和胚胎发生,并详细描述了脂肪瘤全切除和受影响神经根重建的技术。其具体任务是解决围绕复杂脊髓发育不良性脂肪瘤治疗的两个主要问题:全切除是否比部分切除更能带来长期疗效;对于无症状的脂肪瘤,全切除是否比保守治疗(即不手术)效果更好。因此,我们将资深作者及其同事的 300 多例全切除术系列的 24 年无进展生存数据与多个部分切除术系列(包括我们自己的)的历史数据进行了比较,并将专门针对无症状病变的全切除术数据与两个已知的同等患者非手术治疗系列进行了比较。迄今为止的这些比较充分支持了作者的建议,即无论有无症状,大多数复杂脂肪瘤都应进行全切除。无症状的混沌脂肪瘤是一个明显的例外,它与神经组织之间的特殊解剖关系使我们甚至无法采取积极的手术方法,因此,与背侧和过渡性病变的其他两种脂肪瘤亚型相比,其效果更差(当然这只是少数病例)。因此,我们目前不赞成对无症状的混沌脂肪瘤进行预防性切除。我们最近还发现,一些背侧脂肪瘤在术前影像学检查中具有清晰的锥体轮廓,在不进行手术的情况下保留神经功能的长期预后明显更好。这部分脂肪瘤患者是否应在出现症状前采取保守治疗,现在还是一个未决问题,有待对更多此类患者进行更长时间的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Current Status of the Surgical Management of Complex Spinal Cord Lipomas: Still Navigating the Labyrinth?

This review summarises the classification, anatomy and embryogenesis of complex spinal cord lipomas and describes in some detail the technique of total lipoma resection and radical reconstruction of the affected neural placode. Its specific mission is to tackle two main issues surrounding the management of complex dysraphic lipomas: whether total resection confers better long-term benefits than partial resection and whether total resection does better than conservative treatment, i.e. no surgery, for asymptomatic lipomas. Accordingly, the 24-year progression-free survival data of the senior author and colleagues' series of over 300 cases of total resection are compared with historical data from multiple series (including our own) of partial resection, and total resection data specifically for asymptomatic lesions are compared with the two known series of non-surgical treatment of equivalent patients. These comparisons so far amply support the author's recommendation of total resection for most complex lipomas, with or without symptoms. The notable exception is the asymptomatic chaotic lipoma, whose peculiar anatomical relationship with the neural tissue defies even our aggressive surgical approach, and consequently projects worse results (admittedly of small number of cases) than for the other two lipoma subtypes of dorsal and transitional lesions. Prophylactic resection of asymptomatic chaotic lipomas is therefore not currently endorsed. We have also recently found that some dorsal lipomas with clear outline of the conus on preoperative imaging had a significantly better long-term prognosis of preserving neurourological functions without surgery. Whether this subset of lipomas should be managed conservatively until symptoms arise is now an open question awaiting a longer follow-up of a larger cohort of such patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信