沉浸式虚拟现实对区域麻醉下手术患者焦虑的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Q2 Medicine
Johan Arifin, Mochamat Mochamat, Taufan Pramadika, Dina Paramita, Widya Istanto Nurcahyo
{"title":"沉浸式虚拟现实对区域麻醉下手术患者焦虑的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Johan Arifin,&nbsp;Mochamat Mochamat,&nbsp;Taufan Pramadika,&nbsp;Dina Paramita,&nbsp;Widya Istanto Nurcahyo","doi":"10.5812/aapm-130790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery and anesthesia are associated with increased patient anxiety. Perioperative anxiety is a common problem in regional anesthesia procedures and has an extensive impact. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a potential non-pharmacological distraction method to reduce anxiety. Immersive virtual reality creates a virtual environment that allows patients to interact and immerse in the virtual world, reducing patient anxiety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of IVR on the anxiety of patients undergoing regional anesthetic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 participants referred to Dr. Kariadi General Hospital (Indonesia) from October 2021 to December 2021 were enrolled in this randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into virtual reality (VR) and control groups (n = 15 in each group). The control group received midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) as premedication. The VR group received an IVR intervention without premedication. The data of anxiety scores were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 (STAI-6). This study also collected vital signs, side effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average anxiety level during surgery in the operating room decreased in both groups (P < 0.05); the VR group had a lower score (P = 0.04). A significant reduction in perioperative anxiety levels was observed in the VR group compared to the control group. The patient satisfaction level was also significantly higher in the VR group than in the control group (P = 0.024). Both groups had no significant difference in monitored vital signs, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IVR intervention could reduce anxiety in patients undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia and improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"e130790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/11/aapm-13-2-130790.PMC10461385.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality on Patient Anxiety During Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Johan Arifin,&nbsp;Mochamat Mochamat,&nbsp;Taufan Pramadika,&nbsp;Dina Paramita,&nbsp;Widya Istanto Nurcahyo\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/aapm-130790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery and anesthesia are associated with increased patient anxiety. Perioperative anxiety is a common problem in regional anesthesia procedures and has an extensive impact. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a potential non-pharmacological distraction method to reduce anxiety. Immersive virtual reality creates a virtual environment that allows patients to interact and immerse in the virtual world, reducing patient anxiety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of IVR on the anxiety of patients undergoing regional anesthetic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 participants referred to Dr. Kariadi General Hospital (Indonesia) from October 2021 to December 2021 were enrolled in this randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into virtual reality (VR) and control groups (n = 15 in each group). The control group received midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) as premedication. The VR group received an IVR intervention without premedication. The data of anxiety scores were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 (STAI-6). This study also collected vital signs, side effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average anxiety level during surgery in the operating room decreased in both groups (P < 0.05); the VR group had a lower score (P = 0.04). A significant reduction in perioperative anxiety levels was observed in the VR group compared to the control group. The patient satisfaction level was also significantly higher in the VR group than in the control group (P = 0.024). Both groups had no significant difference in monitored vital signs, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IVR intervention could reduce anxiety in patients undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia and improve patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e130790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/11/aapm-13-2-130790.PMC10461385.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-130790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-130790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:手术和麻醉与患者焦虑增加有关。围手术期焦虑是区域麻醉过程中常见的问题,具有广泛的影响。沉浸式虚拟现实(IVR)是一种潜在的非药物分散注意力的方法,以减少焦虑。沉浸式虚拟现实创造了一个虚拟环境,让患者可以互动,沉浸在虚拟世界中,减少患者的焦虑。目的:本研究旨在探讨IVR对区域麻醉手术患者焦虑的影响。方法:共有30名患者于2021年10月至2021年12月在Dr. Kariadi总医院(印度尼西亚)进行了这项随机、单盲临床试验。将患者分为虚拟现实组(VR)和对照组(每组15例)。对照组给予咪达唑仑(0.02 mg/kg)作前用药。VR组接受IVR干预,没有预先用药。焦虑评分数据采用Spielberger状态-特质焦虑量表6 (STAI-6)进行评估。本研究还收集了生命体征、副作用、患者和外科医生满意度数据。结果:两组患者术中平均焦虑水平均降低(P < 0.05);VR组得分较低(P = 0.04)。与对照组相比,VR组围手术期焦虑水平显著降低。VR组患者满意度显著高于对照组(P = 0.024)。两组在监测的生命体征、副作用和外科医生满意度方面无显著差异。结论:IVR干预可减少区域麻醉下手术患者的焦虑,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality on Patient Anxiety During Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Surgery and anesthesia are associated with increased patient anxiety. Perioperative anxiety is a common problem in regional anesthesia procedures and has an extensive impact. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a potential non-pharmacological distraction method to reduce anxiety. Immersive virtual reality creates a virtual environment that allows patients to interact and immerse in the virtual world, reducing patient anxiety.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of IVR on the anxiety of patients undergoing regional anesthetic surgery.

Methods: A total of 30 participants referred to Dr. Kariadi General Hospital (Indonesia) from October 2021 to December 2021 were enrolled in this randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into virtual reality (VR) and control groups (n = 15 in each group). The control group received midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) as premedication. The VR group received an IVR intervention without premedication. The data of anxiety scores were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 (STAI-6). This study also collected vital signs, side effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction level data.

Results: The average anxiety level during surgery in the operating room decreased in both groups (P < 0.05); the VR group had a lower score (P = 0.04). A significant reduction in perioperative anxiety levels was observed in the VR group compared to the control group. The patient satisfaction level was also significantly higher in the VR group than in the control group (P = 0.024). Both groups had no significant difference in monitored vital signs, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction.

Conclusions: The IVR intervention could reduce anxiety in patients undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia and improve patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信