血浆置换治疗新冠肺炎重症感染所致嗜中性粒细胞减少患者细胞因子风暴的疗效。

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Alireza Sadeghi, Somayeh Sadeghi, Mohammad Saleh Peikar, Maryam Yazdi, Mehran Sharifi, Safie Ghafel, Farzin Khorvash, Behrooz Ataei, Mohammad Reza Safavi, Elahe Nasri
{"title":"血浆置换治疗新冠肺炎重症感染所致嗜中性粒细胞减少患者细胞因子风暴的疗效。","authors":"Alireza Sadeghi,&nbsp;Somayeh Sadeghi,&nbsp;Mohammad Saleh Peikar,&nbsp;Maryam Yazdi,&nbsp;Mehran Sharifi,&nbsp;Safie Ghafel,&nbsp;Farzin Khorvash,&nbsp;Behrooz Ataei,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Safavi,&nbsp;Elahe Nasri","doi":"10.5045/br.2023.2022201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication. However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CR<i>P</i>(<i>P</i><0.001), D-dimer (<i>P</i><0.001), ferritin (<i>P</i>=0.039), and hemoglobin (<i>P</i>=0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P=0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/b7/br-58-2-91.PMC10310491.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of plasmapheresis in neutropenic patients suffering from cytokine storm because of severe COVID-19 infection.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Sadeghi,&nbsp;Somayeh Sadeghi,&nbsp;Mohammad Saleh Peikar,&nbsp;Maryam Yazdi,&nbsp;Mehran Sharifi,&nbsp;Safie Ghafel,&nbsp;Farzin Khorvash,&nbsp;Behrooz Ataei,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Safavi,&nbsp;Elahe Nasri\",\"doi\":\"10.5045/br.2023.2022201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication. However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CR<i>P</i>(<i>P</i><0.001), D-dimer (<i>P</i><0.001), ferritin (<i>P</i>=0.039), and hemoglobin (<i>P</i>=0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P=0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/b7/br-58-2-91.PMC10310491.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的出现和卫生系统对疾病控制的无力,各种治疗理论被提出,但反应存在争议。血浆置换是一种药物。然而,其疗效和适应症的知识是不足的。本研究评估血浆置换在危重癌症患者中的应用。方法:本随机临床试验选取2020-21年重症COVID-19恶性肿瘤患者86例,包括对照组(N=41)和干预组(N=45)。两组均按照国家指南给予新冠肺炎常规药物治疗,干预组采用血浆置换。c -反应蛋白(CRP)、d -二聚体、铁蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、血红蛋白、白细胞、多形核、淋巴细胞和血小板水平在入院时和血浆置换结束时测定。其他变量包括中性粒细胞恢复、重症监护病房入院、插管要求、住院时间和住院结果。结果:干预后两组间CRP(PPP=0.039)、血红蛋白(P=0.006)水平差异有统计学意义。结论:根据研究结果,血浆置换术可显著改善重症COVID-19患者的实验室指标和生存率。这些发现加强了血浆置换在患有中性粒细胞减少症和免疫反应不足的癌症患者中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of plasmapheresis in neutropenic patients suffering from cytokine storm because of severe COVID-19 infection.

Efficacy of plasmapheresis in neutropenic patients suffering from cytokine storm because of severe COVID-19 infection.

Background: With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication. However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes.

Results: CRP(P<0.001), D-dimer (P<0.001), ferritin (P=0.039), and hemoglobin (P=0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (P<0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P=0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信