儿童紧张症的替代精神药物治疗:回顾性分析。

Joshua R Smith, Isaac Baldwin, Tasia York, Carina Anderson, Trey McGonigle, Simon Vandekar, Lee Wachtel, James Luccarelli
{"title":"儿童紧张症的替代精神药物治疗:回顾性分析。","authors":"Joshua R Smith,&nbsp;Isaac Baldwin,&nbsp;Tasia York,&nbsp;Carina Anderson,&nbsp;Trey McGonigle,&nbsp;Simon Vandekar,&nbsp;Lee Wachtel,&nbsp;James Luccarelli","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2023.1208926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric catatonia is a highly co-morbid condition with treatment options often limited to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or lorazepam. However, lorazepam may not be readily available, and access to ECT is limited by restrictive legislation and stigma. This study aims to provide alternative treatment options for pediatric catatonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a single-site retrospective analysis of a private university hospital in the southern United States. The study included patients under eighteen with catatonia who received psychopharmacologic treatment with an agent other than lorazepam. The patients were evaluated with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Kanner Catatonia Severity Scale (KCS), and Kanner Catatonia Examination (KCE) at the time of initial evaluation and upon stabilization. A retrospective clinical global impressions-improvement (CGI-I) score was assigned by four authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 pediatric patients diagnosed with catatonia were identified, and 31 met criteria for the study. 20 (65%) were white, 6 (19%) were Black, 4 (13%) were Hispanic, and 1 (3%) were Indian. Most patients (<i>N</i> = 18; 58%) were insured by Medicaid. The mean age at the time of catatonia diagnosis was 13.5 years. All patients were stabilized on either clonazepam or diazepam, with 21 (68%) requiring treatment with an additional medication of either an anti-epileptic, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and aripiprazole or clozapine. Statistically significant reductions in the BFCRS [<i>t</i> = 11.2, df = 30, std = 6.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (7.8, 15.1)], KCS [<i>t</i> = 4.6, df = 38, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (12.0, 31.0)], and KCE [<i>t</i> = 7.8, df = 30, std = 1.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (1.9, 3.2)] were observed. For CGI-I the results showed that the estimated probability of observing a score better than no change (>4) is 0.976 [t.s. = 43.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.931,0.992)], indicating the average subject is expected to experience some improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In conclusion, all patients responded to these treatments with improvement in their catatonic symptoms. Alternative pharmacologic interventions for catatonia, including benzodiazepines other than lorazepam, valproic acid, NMDA receptor antagonists, and atypical antipsychotics were safe and effective in treating catatonia in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312099/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative psychopharmacologic treatments for pediatric catatonia: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua R Smith,&nbsp;Isaac Baldwin,&nbsp;Tasia York,&nbsp;Carina Anderson,&nbsp;Trey McGonigle,&nbsp;Simon Vandekar,&nbsp;Lee Wachtel,&nbsp;James Luccarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frcha.2023.1208926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric catatonia is a highly co-morbid condition with treatment options often limited to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or lorazepam. However, lorazepam may not be readily available, and access to ECT is limited by restrictive legislation and stigma. This study aims to provide alternative treatment options for pediatric catatonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a single-site retrospective analysis of a private university hospital in the southern United States. The study included patients under eighteen with catatonia who received psychopharmacologic treatment with an agent other than lorazepam. The patients were evaluated with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Kanner Catatonia Severity Scale (KCS), and Kanner Catatonia Examination (KCE) at the time of initial evaluation and upon stabilization. A retrospective clinical global impressions-improvement (CGI-I) score was assigned by four authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 pediatric patients diagnosed with catatonia were identified, and 31 met criteria for the study. 20 (65%) were white, 6 (19%) were Black, 4 (13%) were Hispanic, and 1 (3%) were Indian. Most patients (<i>N</i> = 18; 58%) were insured by Medicaid. The mean age at the time of catatonia diagnosis was 13.5 years. All patients were stabilized on either clonazepam or diazepam, with 21 (68%) requiring treatment with an additional medication of either an anti-epileptic, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and aripiprazole or clozapine. Statistically significant reductions in the BFCRS [<i>t</i> = 11.2, df = 30, std = 6.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (7.8, 15.1)], KCS [<i>t</i> = 4.6, df = 38, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (12.0, 31.0)], and KCE [<i>t</i> = 7.8, df = 30, std = 1.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (1.9, 3.2)] were observed. For CGI-I the results showed that the estimated probability of observing a score better than no change (>4) is 0.976 [t.s. = 43.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.931,0.992)], indicating the average subject is expected to experience some improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In conclusion, all patients responded to these treatments with improvement in their catatonic symptoms. Alternative pharmacologic interventions for catatonia, including benzodiazepines other than lorazepam, valproic acid, NMDA receptor antagonists, and atypical antipsychotics were safe and effective in treating catatonia in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1208926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1208926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

儿童紧张症是一种高度合并症,治疗选择通常仅限于电休克治疗(ECT)或劳拉西泮。然而,劳拉西泮可能不容易获得,而且电痉挛疗法的使用受到限制性立法和耻辱感的限制。本研究旨在为小儿紧张症提供替代治疗方案。方法:本研究对美国南部一所私立大学医院进行单点回顾性分析。该研究包括18岁以下的紧张症患者,他们接受了劳拉西泮以外的精神药物治疗。患者在初始评估和病情稳定时分别采用Bush-Francis紧张症评定量表(BFCRS)、Kanner紧张症严重程度量表(KCS)和Kanner紧张症检查(KCE)进行评估。回顾性临床整体印象改善(CGI-I)评分由四位作者分配。结果:102例诊断为紧张症的儿童患者被确定,其中31例符合研究标准。白人20人(65%),黑人6人(19%),西班牙裔4人(13%),印第安人1人(3%)。大多数患者(N = 18;58%)参加了医疗补助。诊断为紧张症时的平均年龄为13.5岁。所有患者使用氯硝西泮或地西泮稳定,21例(68%)患者需要额外使用抗癫痫药物、n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂、阿立哌唑或氯氮平进行治疗。BFCRS [t = 11.2, df = 30, std = 6.3, p < 0.001, 95% CI =(7.8, 15.1)]、KCS [t = 4.6, df = 38, p < 0.001, 95% CI =(12.0, 31.0)]和KCE [t = 7.8, df = 30, std = 1.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI =(1.9, 3.2)]均有统计学意义的降低。对于CGI-I,结果显示观察到得分优于无变化(>4)的估计概率为0.976 [t.s]。= 43.2, p < 0.001, 95% CI =(0.931,0.992)],表明一般受试者预期会有一些改善。讨论:总之,所有患者对这些治疗都有反应,紧张性症状得到改善。治疗紧张症的替代药物干预,包括苯二氮卓类药物,而不是劳拉西泮、丙戊酸、NMDA受体拮抗剂和非典型抗精神病药物,在治疗该人群的紧张症中是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alternative psychopharmacologic treatments for pediatric catatonia: a retrospective analysis.

Alternative psychopharmacologic treatments for pediatric catatonia: a retrospective analysis.

Alternative psychopharmacologic treatments for pediatric catatonia: a retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Pediatric catatonia is a highly co-morbid condition with treatment options often limited to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or lorazepam. However, lorazepam may not be readily available, and access to ECT is limited by restrictive legislation and stigma. This study aims to provide alternative treatment options for pediatric catatonia.

Methods: The study involved a single-site retrospective analysis of a private university hospital in the southern United States. The study included patients under eighteen with catatonia who received psychopharmacologic treatment with an agent other than lorazepam. The patients were evaluated with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Kanner Catatonia Severity Scale (KCS), and Kanner Catatonia Examination (KCE) at the time of initial evaluation and upon stabilization. A retrospective clinical global impressions-improvement (CGI-I) score was assigned by four authors.

Results: 102 pediatric patients diagnosed with catatonia were identified, and 31 met criteria for the study. 20 (65%) were white, 6 (19%) were Black, 4 (13%) were Hispanic, and 1 (3%) were Indian. Most patients (N = 18; 58%) were insured by Medicaid. The mean age at the time of catatonia diagnosis was 13.5 years. All patients were stabilized on either clonazepam or diazepam, with 21 (68%) requiring treatment with an additional medication of either an anti-epileptic, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and aripiprazole or clozapine. Statistically significant reductions in the BFCRS [t = 11.2, df = 30, std = 6.3, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (7.8, 15.1)], KCS [t = 4.6, df = 38, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (12.0, 31.0)], and KCE [t = 7.8, df = 30, std = 1.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (1.9, 3.2)] were observed. For CGI-I the results showed that the estimated probability of observing a score better than no change (>4) is 0.976 [t.s. = 43.2, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.931,0.992)], indicating the average subject is expected to experience some improvement.

Discussion: In conclusion, all patients responded to these treatments with improvement in their catatonic symptoms. Alternative pharmacologic interventions for catatonia, including benzodiazepines other than lorazepam, valproic acid, NMDA receptor antagonists, and atypical antipsychotics were safe and effective in treating catatonia in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信