Shrivuthsun Srigandan, Marilyn Zelesco, Steven Abbott, Christopher J Welman
{"title":"肝脂肪变性的肝肾指数与衰减成像的相关性","authors":"Shrivuthsun Srigandan, Marilyn Zelesco, Steven Abbott, Christopher J Welman","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Hepatic steatosis screening is required to assess high-risk populations, identify those for intervention, monitor response and prevent disease progression and complications. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction are current gold standards, but are limited by biopsy risk factors, patient tolerance and cost. Non-invasive, cost-effective, semi-quantitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment exists. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the semi-quantitative hepatorenal index (HRI) to assess hepatic steatosis using the quantitative attenuation imaging (ATI) as a reference standard, in adults with varied suspected liver pathologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected prospectively between April 2019 and March 2020 at a tertiary institution on any patient >18 years referred to US assessment of suspected liver pathology. The only exclusion criteria were absent or invalid HRI or ATI measurements. Three hundred fifty eight patients were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a significant weak positive correlation between HRI and ATI (r = 0.351, P < 0.001) and between HRI steatosis grade (SG) and ATI SG (r = 0.329, P < 0.001), using previously established cut-off values. With ATI as the reference standard, there was no significant correlation between HRI and hepatic steatosis within steatosis grades, nor for no (SG = 0) or any (SG > 0) hepatic steatosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study in a typical heterogeneous clinical population suggests the semi-quantitative HRI is of limited use in hepatic steatosis imaging. As HRI is the objective measure of the subjective brightness (B)-mode assessment, this imaging feature may not be as reliable as previously thought. Quantitative ATI may be the preferred non-invasive technique for hepatic steatosis assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 3","pages":"107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351430/pdf/AJUM-25-107.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between hepatorenal index and attenuation imaging for assessing hepatic steatosis\",\"authors\":\"Shrivuthsun Srigandan, Marilyn Zelesco, Steven Abbott, Christopher J Welman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajum.12297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hepatic steatosis screening is required to assess high-risk populations, identify those for intervention, monitor response and prevent disease progression and complications. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction are current gold standards, but are limited by biopsy risk factors, patient tolerance and cost. Non-invasive, cost-effective, semi-quantitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment exists. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the semi-quantitative hepatorenal index (HRI) to assess hepatic steatosis using the quantitative attenuation imaging (ATI) as a reference standard, in adults with varied suspected liver pathologies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were collected prospectively between April 2019 and March 2020 at a tertiary institution on any patient >18 years referred to US assessment of suspected liver pathology. The only exclusion criteria were absent or invalid HRI or ATI measurements. Three hundred fifty eight patients were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a significant weak positive correlation between HRI and ATI (r = 0.351, P < 0.001) and between HRI steatosis grade (SG) and ATI SG (r = 0.329, P < 0.001), using previously established cut-off values. With ATI as the reference standard, there was no significant correlation between HRI and hepatic steatosis within steatosis grades, nor for no (SG = 0) or any (SG > 0) hepatic steatosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study in a typical heterogeneous clinical population suggests the semi-quantitative HRI is of limited use in hepatic steatosis imaging. As HRI is the objective measure of the subjective brightness (B)-mode assessment, this imaging feature may not be as reliable as previously thought. Quantitative ATI may be the preferred non-invasive technique for hepatic steatosis assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"107-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351430/pdf/AJUM-25-107.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
肝脂肪变性筛查需要评估高危人群,确定需要干预的人群,监测反应并预防疾病进展和并发症。肝活检和磁共振成像质子密度脂肪分数是目前的金标准,但受到活检危险因素、患者耐受性和成本的限制。无创、低成本、半定量和定量超声评估存在。本研究的目的是评估半定量肝肾指数(HRI)之间的相关性,以定量衰减成像(ATI)作为参考标准,在各种可疑肝脏病变的成年人中评估肝脂肪变性。方法前瞻性收集2019年4月至2020年3月期间在一所高等教育机构接受美国疑似肝脏病理评估的任何18岁患者的数据。唯一的排除标准是缺乏或无效的HRI或ATI测量。共纳入338名患者。结果HRI与ATI之间存在显著的弱正相关(r = 0.351, P < 0.001), HRI脂肪变性分级(SG)与ATI SG之间存在显著的弱正相关(r = 0.329, P < 0.001)。以ATI为参考标准,HRI与肝脂肪变性分级之间无显著相关性,与无(SG = 0)或有(SG > 0)肝脂肪变性之间无显著相关性。结论:我们在一个典型的异质临床人群中的研究表明,半定量HRI在肝脂肪变性成像中的应用有限。由于HRI是主观亮度(B)模式评估的客观度量,因此该成像特征可能不像以前认为的那样可靠。定量ATI可能是评估肝脂肪变性的首选非侵入性技术。
Correlation between hepatorenal index and attenuation imaging for assessing hepatic steatosis
Introduction
Hepatic steatosis screening is required to assess high-risk populations, identify those for intervention, monitor response and prevent disease progression and complications. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction are current gold standards, but are limited by biopsy risk factors, patient tolerance and cost. Non-invasive, cost-effective, semi-quantitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment exists. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the semi-quantitative hepatorenal index (HRI) to assess hepatic steatosis using the quantitative attenuation imaging (ATI) as a reference standard, in adults with varied suspected liver pathologies.
Methods
Data were collected prospectively between April 2019 and March 2020 at a tertiary institution on any patient >18 years referred to US assessment of suspected liver pathology. The only exclusion criteria were absent or invalid HRI or ATI measurements. Three hundred fifty eight patients were included.
Results
There was a significant weak positive correlation between HRI and ATI (r = 0.351, P < 0.001) and between HRI steatosis grade (SG) and ATI SG (r = 0.329, P < 0.001), using previously established cut-off values. With ATI as the reference standard, there was no significant correlation between HRI and hepatic steatosis within steatosis grades, nor for no (SG = 0) or any (SG > 0) hepatic steatosis.
Conclusions
Our study in a typical heterogeneous clinical population suggests the semi-quantitative HRI is of limited use in hepatic steatosis imaging. As HRI is the objective measure of the subjective brightness (B)-mode assessment, this imaging feature may not be as reliable as previously thought. Quantitative ATI may be the preferred non-invasive technique for hepatic steatosis assessment.