计算机测试中的项目重访行为建模:探索作为附带信息的项目重访的效果。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02209-y
Jiwei Zhang, Chun Wang, Jing Lu
{"title":"计算机测试中的项目重访行为建模:探索作为附带信息的项目重访的效果。","authors":"Jiwei Zhang, Chun Wang, Jing Lu","doi":"10.3758/s13428-023-02209-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Item revisiting behavior is one of the most frequently occurring test-taking strategies, and it can decrease test anxiety and improve test validity. Examinees either confirm the initial answers due to persistence of their beliefs or change to different answers after careful rethought on each part of the questions. Item revisiting sequences as collateral information reveal the examinees' underlying psychological processes, such as motivation, effort, and engagement, which supports policy makers in taking further steps to facilitate instructions for the examinees. Item revisiting behavior is commonly correlated with the latent traits of examinees, and it needs to be properly analyzed in order to make valid statistical inference. In this paper, we proposed a novel item revisiting model, in which a monotonicity assumption is considered based on the observation that examinees are more likely to revisit the current item if more revisiting behavior occurs previously. Three simulation studies were conducted: (1) to evaluate the performance of the proposed Bayesian estimation algorithm for the new model; (2) to show that ignoring item revisiting sequences induces biased parameter estimates; (3) to assess the model fit of the proposed model with the ignorable and nonignorable item revisiting behavior assumptions. The results indicate that item revisiting behavior can be effectively utilized in conjunction with responses and response times to improve parameter estimation precision. A real data example is provided to illustrate the application of the proposed model.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":" ","pages":"4661-4681"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling item revisiting behavior in computer-based testing: Exploring the effect of item revisitations as collateral information.\",\"authors\":\"Jiwei Zhang, Chun Wang, Jing Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-023-02209-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Item revisiting behavior is one of the most frequently occurring test-taking strategies, and it can decrease test anxiety and improve test validity. Examinees either confirm the initial answers due to persistence of their beliefs or change to different answers after careful rethought on each part of the questions. Item revisiting sequences as collateral information reveal the examinees' underlying psychological processes, such as motivation, effort, and engagement, which supports policy makers in taking further steps to facilitate instructions for the examinees. Item revisiting behavior is commonly correlated with the latent traits of examinees, and it needs to be properly analyzed in order to make valid statistical inference. In this paper, we proposed a novel item revisiting model, in which a monotonicity assumption is considered based on the observation that examinees are more likely to revisit the current item if more revisiting behavior occurs previously. Three simulation studies were conducted: (1) to evaluate the performance of the proposed Bayesian estimation algorithm for the new model; (2) to show that ignoring item revisiting sequences induces biased parameter estimates; (3) to assess the model fit of the proposed model with the ignorable and nonignorable item revisiting behavior assumptions. The results indicate that item revisiting behavior can be effectively utilized in conjunction with responses and response times to improve parameter estimation precision. A real data example is provided to illustrate the application of the proposed model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4661-4681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02209-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02209-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

题目重审行为是最常见的应试策略之一,它可以减轻考试焦虑,提高考试效度。考生或因坚持自己的信念而确认最初的答案,或在对试题的每一部分进行认真思考后改用不同的答案。题目重审序列作为附带信息,揭示了考生的潜在心理过程,如动机、努力程度和参与度等,有助于决策者采取进一步措施,促进对考生的指导。项目重访行为通常与考生的潜在特质相关,需要对其进行适当分析才能做出有效的统计推断。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的项目重访模型,该模型基于单调性假设,即如果考生之前有更多的重访行为,那么他们就更有可能重访当前项目。我们进行了三项模拟研究:(1) 评估针对新模型提出的贝叶斯估计算法的性能;(2) 证明忽略项目重访序列会导致参数估计偏差;(3) 评估提出的模型与可忽略和不可忽略的项目重访行为假设的拟合程度。结果表明,项目重访行为可以有效地与应答和应答时间结合使用,从而提高参数估计的精度。本文提供了一个真实数据示例来说明所提模型的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling item revisiting behavior in computer-based testing: Exploring the effect of item revisitations as collateral information.

Item revisiting behavior is one of the most frequently occurring test-taking strategies, and it can decrease test anxiety and improve test validity. Examinees either confirm the initial answers due to persistence of their beliefs or change to different answers after careful rethought on each part of the questions. Item revisiting sequences as collateral information reveal the examinees' underlying psychological processes, such as motivation, effort, and engagement, which supports policy makers in taking further steps to facilitate instructions for the examinees. Item revisiting behavior is commonly correlated with the latent traits of examinees, and it needs to be properly analyzed in order to make valid statistical inference. In this paper, we proposed a novel item revisiting model, in which a monotonicity assumption is considered based on the observation that examinees are more likely to revisit the current item if more revisiting behavior occurs previously. Three simulation studies were conducted: (1) to evaluate the performance of the proposed Bayesian estimation algorithm for the new model; (2) to show that ignoring item revisiting sequences induces biased parameter estimates; (3) to assess the model fit of the proposed model with the ignorable and nonignorable item revisiting behavior assumptions. The results indicate that item revisiting behavior can be effectively utilized in conjunction with responses and response times to improve parameter estimation precision. A real data example is provided to illustrate the application of the proposed model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信