Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala
{"title":"回顾性比较阿巴拉契亚地区一家学术医疗中心对怀孕和未怀孕患者进行的 3 种梅毒血清学筛查试验的假阳性结果频率。","authors":"Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"293-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective comparison of false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests in pregnant and nonpregnant patients at an academic medical center in Appalachia.\",\"authors\":\"Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmad078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"293-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective comparison of false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests in pregnant and nonpregnant patients at an academic medical center in Appalachia.
Objective: This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.
Methods: Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.
Results: False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.
Conclusion: Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.