回顾性比较阿巴拉契亚地区一家学术医疗中心对怀孕和未怀孕患者进行的 3 种梅毒血清学筛查试验的假阳性结果频率。

Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala
{"title":"回顾性比较阿巴拉契亚地区一家学术医疗中心对怀孕和未怀孕患者进行的 3 种梅毒血清学筛查试验的假阳性结果频率。","authors":"Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"293-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective comparison of false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests in pregnant and nonpregnant patients at an academic medical center in Appalachia.\",\"authors\":\"Jianbo Yang, Danyel H Tacker, Sijin Wen, P Rocco LaSala\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmad078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"293-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究回顾性比较了3种梅毒血清学筛查试验的假阳性结果频率,并评估了假阳性是否与妊娠和年龄有关:从实验室数据库中检索了3种筛查试验的结果,包括2016年10月至2019年9月期间的快速血浆试剂(RPR)测定、2020年5月至2022年1月期间的BioPlex 2200梅毒全免疫测定以及2022年2月至2023年4月期间的Alinity i梅毒TP测定。假阳性结果频率是根据检测算法标准计算得出的:BioPlex的假阳性结果频率为0.61%(90/14,707),明显高于RPR的0.29%(50/17,447)和Alinity的0.38%(55/14,631)(P均<0.01)。在 RPR 检测中,假阳性结果患者的年龄明显大于非反应性结果患者(中位年龄:36 岁 vs 28 岁,P < .001),但在 BioPlex 或 Alinity 检测中,假阳性结果患者的年龄明显小于非反应性结果患者(中位年龄:36 岁 vs 28 岁,P < .001)。在所有 3 项检测中,孕妇的阳性预测值均低于非孕妇或男性。然而,孕妇的假阳性结果频率并不高:结论:虽然三种梅毒血清学检测的假阳性结果频率总体较低,但不同检测之间存在显著差异。在所有3种检测中,怀孕与更多的假阳性结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective comparison of false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests in pregnant and nonpregnant patients at an academic medical center in Appalachia.

Objective: This study retrospectively compared false-positive result frequencies of 3 syphilis serology screening tests and assessed whether false positivity was associated with pregnancy and age.

Methods: Results for 3 screening tests were retrieved from the laboratory database, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay between October 2016 and September 2019, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total immunoassay between May 2020 and January 2022, and Alinity i Syphilis TP assay between February 2022 and April 2023. The false-positive result frequencies were calculated based on testing algorithm criteria.

Results: False-positive result frequency for BioPlex was 0.61% (90/14,707), significantly higher than 0.29% (50/17,447) for RPR and 0.38% (55/14,631) for Alinity (both P < .01). Patients with false-positive results were significantly older than patients with nonreactive results for RPR (median age: 36 vs 28, P < .001), but not for BioPlex or Alinity. For all 3 tests, the positive predictive values in pregnant women were lower than those in nonpregnant women or men. However, pregnant women did not exhibit a higher false-positive result frequency.

Conclusion: Although false-positive result frequencies were low overall for all 3 syphilis serology tests, there is a significant difference between different tests. Pregnancy was not associated with more false-positive results for all 3 tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信