分割算法可用于SD大鼠肝纤维化的检测。

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ji-Hee Hwang, Minyoung Lim, Gyeongjin Han, Heejin Park, Yong-Bum Kim, Jinseok Park, Sang-Yeop Jun, Jaeku Lee, Jae-Woo Cho
{"title":"分割算法可用于SD大鼠肝纤维化的检测。","authors":"Ji-Hee Hwang,&nbsp;Minyoung Lim,&nbsp;Gyeongjin Han,&nbsp;Heejin Park,&nbsp;Yong-Bum Kim,&nbsp;Jinseok Park,&nbsp;Sang-Yeop Jun,&nbsp;Jaeku Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Woo Cho","doi":"10.1186/s42826-023-00167-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver fibrosis is an early stage of liver cirrhosis. As a reversible lesion before cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, it has been a target for drug discovery. Many antifibrotic candidates have shown promising results in experimental animal models; however, due to adverse clinical reactions, most antifibrotic agents are still preclinical. Therefore, rodent models have been used to examine the histopathological differences between the control and treatment groups to evaluate the efficacy of anti-fibrotic agents in non-clinical research. In addition, with improvements in digital image analysis incorporating artificial intelligence (AI), a few researchers have developed an automated quantification of fibrosis. However, the performance of multiple deep learning algorithms for the optimal quantification of hepatic fibrosis has not been evaluated. Here, we investigated three different localization algorithms, mask R-CNN, DeepLabV3<sup>+</sup>, and SSD, to detect hepatic fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5750 images with 7503 annotations were trained using the three algorithms, and the model performance was evaluated in large-scale images and compared to the training images. The results showed that the precision values were comparable among the algorithms. However, there was a gap in the recall, leading to a difference in model accuracy. The mask R-CNN outperformed the recall value (0.93) and showed the closest prediction results to the annotation for detecting hepatic fibrosis among the algorithms. DeepLabV3<sup>+</sup> also showed good performance; however, it had limitations in the misprediction of hepatic fibrosis as inflammatory cells and connective tissue. The trained SSD showed the lowest performance and was limited in predicting hepatic fibrosis compared to the other algorithms because of its low recall value (0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest it would be a more useful tool to apply segmentation algorithms in implementing AI algorithms to predict hepatic fibrosis in non-clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17993,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmentation algorithm can be used for detecting hepatic fibrosis in SD rat.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Hee Hwang,&nbsp;Minyoung Lim,&nbsp;Gyeongjin Han,&nbsp;Heejin Park,&nbsp;Yong-Bum Kim,&nbsp;Jinseok Park,&nbsp;Sang-Yeop Jun,&nbsp;Jaeku Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Woo Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42826-023-00167-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver fibrosis is an early stage of liver cirrhosis. As a reversible lesion before cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, it has been a target for drug discovery. Many antifibrotic candidates have shown promising results in experimental animal models; however, due to adverse clinical reactions, most antifibrotic agents are still preclinical. Therefore, rodent models have been used to examine the histopathological differences between the control and treatment groups to evaluate the efficacy of anti-fibrotic agents in non-clinical research. In addition, with improvements in digital image analysis incorporating artificial intelligence (AI), a few researchers have developed an automated quantification of fibrosis. However, the performance of multiple deep learning algorithms for the optimal quantification of hepatic fibrosis has not been evaluated. Here, we investigated three different localization algorithms, mask R-CNN, DeepLabV3<sup>+</sup>, and SSD, to detect hepatic fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5750 images with 7503 annotations were trained using the three algorithms, and the model performance was evaluated in large-scale images and compared to the training images. The results showed that the precision values were comparable among the algorithms. However, there was a gap in the recall, leading to a difference in model accuracy. The mask R-CNN outperformed the recall value (0.93) and showed the closest prediction results to the annotation for detecting hepatic fibrosis among the algorithms. DeepLabV3<sup>+</sup> also showed good performance; however, it had limitations in the misprediction of hepatic fibrosis as inflammatory cells and connective tissue. The trained SSD showed the lowest performance and was limited in predicting hepatic fibrosis compared to the other algorithms because of its low recall value (0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest it would be a more useful tool to apply segmentation algorithms in implementing AI algorithms to predict hepatic fibrosis in non-clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory Animal Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory Animal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00167-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-023-00167-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝纤维化是肝硬化的早期阶段。作为肝硬化、肝功能衰竭和肝癌前的一种可逆性病变,它一直是药物发现的靶点。许多抗纤维化候选药物在实验动物模型中显示出有希望的结果;然而,由于临床不良反应,大多数抗纤维化药物仍处于临床前阶段。因此,在非临床研究中,采用啮齿类动物模型来检查对照组和治疗组之间的组织病理学差异,以评估抗纤维化药物的疗效。此外,随着结合人工智能(AI)的数字图像分析的改进,一些研究人员开发了一种纤维化的自动量化方法。然而,用于肝纤维化最佳量化的多种深度学习算法的性能尚未得到评估。在这里,我们研究了三种不同的定位算法,mask R-CNN, DeepLabV3+和SSD,以检测肝纤维化。结果:使用这三种算法训练了5750张带有7503个注释的图像,并在大规模图像中评估了模型的性能,并与训练图像进行了比较。结果表明,各算法的精度值具有可比性。然而,在召回中存在差距,导致模型准确性的差异。掩膜R-CNN优于召回值(0.93),并且在算法中显示出与检测肝纤维化注释最接近的预测结果。DeepLabV3+也表现出良好的性能;然而,它在将肝纤维化错误预测为炎症细胞和结缔组织方面存在局限性。与其他算法相比,训练后的SSD表现出最低的性能,并且由于召回值较低(0.75),在预测肝纤维化方面受到限制。结论:我们认为,在非临床研究中,应用分割算法来实现人工智能算法预测肝纤维化将是一个更有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Segmentation algorithm can be used for detecting hepatic fibrosis in SD rat.

Segmentation algorithm can be used for detecting hepatic fibrosis in SD rat.

Segmentation algorithm can be used for detecting hepatic fibrosis in SD rat.

Segmentation algorithm can be used for detecting hepatic fibrosis in SD rat.

Background: Liver fibrosis is an early stage of liver cirrhosis. As a reversible lesion before cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, it has been a target for drug discovery. Many antifibrotic candidates have shown promising results in experimental animal models; however, due to adverse clinical reactions, most antifibrotic agents are still preclinical. Therefore, rodent models have been used to examine the histopathological differences between the control and treatment groups to evaluate the efficacy of anti-fibrotic agents in non-clinical research. In addition, with improvements in digital image analysis incorporating artificial intelligence (AI), a few researchers have developed an automated quantification of fibrosis. However, the performance of multiple deep learning algorithms for the optimal quantification of hepatic fibrosis has not been evaluated. Here, we investigated three different localization algorithms, mask R-CNN, DeepLabV3+, and SSD, to detect hepatic fibrosis.

Results: 5750 images with 7503 annotations were trained using the three algorithms, and the model performance was evaluated in large-scale images and compared to the training images. The results showed that the precision values were comparable among the algorithms. However, there was a gap in the recall, leading to a difference in model accuracy. The mask R-CNN outperformed the recall value (0.93) and showed the closest prediction results to the annotation for detecting hepatic fibrosis among the algorithms. DeepLabV3+ also showed good performance; however, it had limitations in the misprediction of hepatic fibrosis as inflammatory cells and connective tissue. The trained SSD showed the lowest performance and was limited in predicting hepatic fibrosis compared to the other algorithms because of its low recall value (0.75).

Conclusions: We suggest it would be a more useful tool to apply segmentation algorithms in implementing AI algorithms to predict hepatic fibrosis in non-clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信