{"title":"胸膜下纤维化间质性肺异常与非小细胞肺癌放疗结果有关。","authors":"Makoto Ito, Takuma Katano, Hiroaki Okada, Ami Sakuragi, Yoshitaka Minami, Souichiro Abe, Sou Adachi, Yukihiko Oshima, Wataru Ohashi, Akihito Kubo, Takayuki Fukui, Satoru Ito, Kojiro Suzuki","doi":"10.2478/raon-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and the outcomes of lung cancer radiotherapy is unclear. This study investigated whether specific ILA subtypes are risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical-intent or salvage radiotherapy. Patients were categorised into normal (no abnormalities), ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups. The ILA group was further subclassified into non-subpleural (NS), subpleural non-fibrotic (SNF), and subpleural fibrotic (SF) types. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine RP and survival rates and compare these outcomes between groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 175 patients (normal, n = 105; ILA-NS, n = 5; ILA-SNF, n = 28; ILA-SF, n = 31; ILD, n = 6) were enrolled. Grade ≥2 RP was observed in 71 (41%) patients. ILAs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.33, p = 0.008), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HR: 0.38, p = 0.03), and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (HR: 54.8, p = 0.03) contributed to the cumulative incidence of RP. Eight patients with grade 5 RP were in the ILA group, seven of whom had ILA-SF. Among radically treated patients, the ILA group had worse 2-year overall survival (OS) than the normal group (35.3% vs 54.6%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ILA-SF group contributed to poor OS (HR: 3.07, p =0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ILAs, particularly ILA-SF, may be important risk factors for RP, which can worsen prognosis. These findings may aid in making decisions regarding radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"57 2","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286887/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subpleural fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities are implicated in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Ito, Takuma Katano, Hiroaki Okada, Ami Sakuragi, Yoshitaka Minami, Souichiro Abe, Sou Adachi, Yukihiko Oshima, Wataru Ohashi, Akihito Kubo, Takayuki Fukui, Satoru Ito, Kojiro Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2023-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and the outcomes of lung cancer radiotherapy is unclear. This study investigated whether specific ILA subtypes are risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical-intent or salvage radiotherapy. Patients were categorised into normal (no abnormalities), ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups. The ILA group was further subclassified into non-subpleural (NS), subpleural non-fibrotic (SNF), and subpleural fibrotic (SF) types. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine RP and survival rates and compare these outcomes between groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 175 patients (normal, n = 105; ILA-NS, n = 5; ILA-SNF, n = 28; ILA-SF, n = 31; ILD, n = 6) were enrolled. Grade ≥2 RP was observed in 71 (41%) patients. ILAs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.33, p = 0.008), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HR: 0.38, p = 0.03), and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (HR: 54.8, p = 0.03) contributed to the cumulative incidence of RP. Eight patients with grade 5 RP were in the ILA group, seven of whom had ILA-SF. Among radically treated patients, the ILA group had worse 2-year overall survival (OS) than the normal group (35.3% vs 54.6%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ILA-SF group contributed to poor OS (HR: 3.07, p =0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ILAs, particularly ILA-SF, may be important risk factors for RP, which can worsen prognosis. These findings may aid in making decisions regarding radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"229-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:间质性肺异常(ILAs)与肺癌放疗预后的关系尚不清楚。本研究探讨特异性ILA亚型是否是放射性肺炎(RP)的危险因素。患者和方法:本回顾性研究分析了接受根治或补救性放疗的非小细胞肺癌患者。患者被分为正常(无异常)、ILA和间质性肺疾病(ILD)组。ILA组进一步分为非胸膜下(NS)型、胸膜下非纤维化(SNF)型和胸膜下纤维化(SF)型。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归方法分别确定RP和生存率,并比较两组间的结果。结果:175例患者(正常,n = 105;ILA-NS, n = 5;ILA-SNF, n = 28;ILA-SF, n = 31;纳入ILD, n = 6)例。71例(41%)患者RP≥2级。ILAs(风险比[HR]: 2.33, p = 0.008)、调强放疗(HR: 0.38, p = 0.03)和肺容量接受20 Gy (HR: 54.8, p = 0.03)对RP的累积发生率有影响。ILA组有8例5级RP,其中7例有ILA- sf。在接受根治的患者中,ILA组的2年总生存率(OS)低于正常组(35.3% vs 54.6%, p = 0.005)。多因素分析显示,ILA-SF组OS较差(HR: 3.07, p =0.02)。结论:ila特别是ILA-SF可能是RP的重要危险因素,可使预后恶化。这些发现可能有助于决定是否进行放射治疗。
Subpleural fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities are implicated in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy outcomes.
Background: The relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and the outcomes of lung cancer radiotherapy is unclear. This study investigated whether specific ILA subtypes are risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP).
Patients and methods: This retrospective study analysed patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical-intent or salvage radiotherapy. Patients were categorised into normal (no abnormalities), ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups. The ILA group was further subclassified into non-subpleural (NS), subpleural non-fibrotic (SNF), and subpleural fibrotic (SF) types. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine RP and survival rates and compare these outcomes between groups, respectively.
Results: Overall, 175 patients (normal, n = 105; ILA-NS, n = 5; ILA-SNF, n = 28; ILA-SF, n = 31; ILD, n = 6) were enrolled. Grade ≥2 RP was observed in 71 (41%) patients. ILAs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.33, p = 0.008), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HR: 0.38, p = 0.03), and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (HR: 54.8, p = 0.03) contributed to the cumulative incidence of RP. Eight patients with grade 5 RP were in the ILA group, seven of whom had ILA-SF. Among radically treated patients, the ILA group had worse 2-year overall survival (OS) than the normal group (35.3% vs 54.6%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ILA-SF group contributed to poor OS (HR: 3.07, p =0.02).
Conclusions: ILAs, particularly ILA-SF, may be important risk factors for RP, which can worsen prognosis. These findings may aid in making decisions regarding radiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.