英国对自愿退出立法下器官捐献者登记的态度。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1177/15269248231189869
Natalie L Clark, Lee Copping, Katherine Swainston, Grant J McGeechan
{"title":"英国对自愿退出立法下器官捐献者登记的态度。","authors":"Natalie L Clark,&nbsp;Lee Copping,&nbsp;Katherine Swainston,&nbsp;Grant J McGeechan","doi":"10.1177/15269248231189869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In England, everyone is considered an organ donor unless they have registered for opt-out donation. <b>Research Question:</b> This study evaluated positive statements and negative affective attitudes against anticipated organ donor status and whether the order in the attitudes and statements presented impacted organ donor intention under an opt-out system. <b>Design:</b> A quasi-experimental mixed between-within design was employed with participants assigned to 1 of 2 conditions. Participants in the first condition received negative affective attitude statements followed by positive statements. This was reversed in the second condition to combat ordering effects. Participants (<i>N</i> = 679) were asked about their donor status under an opt-out system. There were three groups: opt-in (actively), opt-out/not sure, and deemed consent (no objection). Organ donor intentions were measured at three intervals: baseline, post-positive statements, and post-negative attitudes. <b>Results:</b> Approximately 10% of participants would opt-out or were unsure of their intentions to be an organ donor under an opt-out system. Significant effects were found in both positive statements and negative affective attitudes. All groups expressed greater medical mistrust and were most influenced by cognitive attitudes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Under the opt-out system in England, it is anticipated that the majority would actively opt-in or have no objection to being automatically registered as an organ donor. Public health campaigns would benefit from promoting the most influential positive statements and refuting the most detrimental negative attitudes to increase intentions of those who plan to opt-out or are unsure.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"33 3","pages":"208-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes to Organ Donor Registration in England Under Opt-Out Legislation.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie L Clark,&nbsp;Lee Copping,&nbsp;Katherine Swainston,&nbsp;Grant J McGeechan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248231189869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In England, everyone is considered an organ donor unless they have registered for opt-out donation. <b>Research Question:</b> This study evaluated positive statements and negative affective attitudes against anticipated organ donor status and whether the order in the attitudes and statements presented impacted organ donor intention under an opt-out system. <b>Design:</b> A quasi-experimental mixed between-within design was employed with participants assigned to 1 of 2 conditions. Participants in the first condition received negative affective attitude statements followed by positive statements. This was reversed in the second condition to combat ordering effects. Participants (<i>N</i> = 679) were asked about their donor status under an opt-out system. There were three groups: opt-in (actively), opt-out/not sure, and deemed consent (no objection). Organ donor intentions were measured at three intervals: baseline, post-positive statements, and post-negative attitudes. <b>Results:</b> Approximately 10% of participants would opt-out or were unsure of their intentions to be an organ donor under an opt-out system. Significant effects were found in both positive statements and negative affective attitudes. All groups expressed greater medical mistrust and were most influenced by cognitive attitudes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Under the opt-out system in England, it is anticipated that the majority would actively opt-in or have no objection to being automatically registered as an organ donor. Public health campaigns would benefit from promoting the most influential positive statements and refuting the most detrimental negative attitudes to increase intentions of those who plan to opt-out or are unsure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"208-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231189869\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231189869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:在英国,每个人都被视为器官捐献者,除非他们已经登记选择不捐献。研究问题:本研究评估了积极的陈述和消极的情感态度对预期器官捐献者状态的影响,以及在选择退出制度下,态度和陈述的顺序是否影响器官捐献者的意愿。设计:采用准实验混合设计,参与者被分配到2种条件中的1种。第一种情况下的参与者接受消极的情感态度陈述,然后是积极的陈述。这在第二个条件下被逆转,以对抗命令效果。参与者(N = 679)被问及他们在选择退出制度下的捐赠者身份。有三组:选择加入(主动)、选择退出/不确定和视为同意(无异议)。器官捐献者的意愿以三个时间间隔进行测量:基线、积极陈述后和消极态度后。结果:在选择退出制度下,大约10%的参与者会选择退出或不确定自己是否打算成为器官捐献者。积极的陈述和消极的情感态度都有显著的影响。所有群体都表达了更大的医学不信任,并且受认知态度的影响最大。结论:在英格兰的选择退出制度下,预计大多数人会积极选择加入或不反对自动注册为器官捐献者。公共卫生运动将受益于宣传最具影响力的积极言论和驳斥最有害的消极态度,以增加那些计划退出或不确定的人的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes to Organ Donor Registration in England Under Opt-Out Legislation.

Introduction: In England, everyone is considered an organ donor unless they have registered for opt-out donation. Research Question: This study evaluated positive statements and negative affective attitudes against anticipated organ donor status and whether the order in the attitudes and statements presented impacted organ donor intention under an opt-out system. Design: A quasi-experimental mixed between-within design was employed with participants assigned to 1 of 2 conditions. Participants in the first condition received negative affective attitude statements followed by positive statements. This was reversed in the second condition to combat ordering effects. Participants (N = 679) were asked about their donor status under an opt-out system. There were three groups: opt-in (actively), opt-out/not sure, and deemed consent (no objection). Organ donor intentions were measured at three intervals: baseline, post-positive statements, and post-negative attitudes. Results: Approximately 10% of participants would opt-out or were unsure of their intentions to be an organ donor under an opt-out system. Significant effects were found in both positive statements and negative affective attitudes. All groups expressed greater medical mistrust and were most influenced by cognitive attitudes. Conclusions: Under the opt-out system in England, it is anticipated that the majority would actively opt-in or have no objection to being automatically registered as an organ donor. Public health campaigns would benefit from promoting the most influential positive statements and refuting the most detrimental negative attitudes to increase intentions of those who plan to opt-out or are unsure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信