{"title":"评估塞内加尔临床医生对真菌感染(真菌病)的知识和经验","authors":"Khadim Diongue , Boubou Dembélé , Mouhamadou Ndiaye , Mame Cheikh Seck , Mamadou Alpha Diallo , Aïda Sadikh Badiane , Daouda Ndiaye , Stéphane Ranque","doi":"10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In order to assess the knowledge and experience of fungal infections<span><span> (FIs) among clinicians in Senegal, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among medical practitioners in Senegal via a questionnaire designed with “Google Forms” between 24 January and 24 April 2022. A total of 100 clinicians responded to the questionnaire. Clinicians in the 31– 40-year-old age group formed the majority of respondents (51%). Male respondents were predominant (72%). Forty-one percent of respondents were general practitioners, 40% were specialist doctors, and the rest were residents. Dermatologists were the most common at 15% (6/40). In terms of clinicians’ general knowledge of fungi, FIs and their therapeutic management, an average of 70% correct answers was recorded. The majority (70%) of respondents cared for between two to four different categories of patients at risk of invasive FIs (IFIs) at a time, with diabetes predominating. Eighty percent confirmed that they had been confronted with FIs, including 43% with superficial FIs, 3% with subcutaneous FIs and 5% with IFIs. Thirty-four percent of doctors stated that they had never suspected an IFI. </span>Candidiasis<span><span> was the most commonly mentioned mycosis by doctors. To support the diagnosis of these FIs, 22% of the clinicians said that they had recourse only to the clinical diagnosis. In total, 79% of clinicians responded that they had never used an antifungal </span>chemoprophylaxis. In addition, 28% and 22% of practicing physicians chose a combination of antifungals for the chemoprophylaxis of </span></span></span>invasive candidiasis<span> and invasive aspergillosis, respectively. This survey shows that both clinicians’ knowledge and experience of fungi, antifungals, FIs and their therapeutic management, as well as chemoprophylaxis, need to be improved. Indeed, half of the clinicians seem to be unaware of the incidence of FIs, in particular IFIs, which, nevertheless, represent some of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":14824,"journal":{"name":"Journal de mycologie medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of knowledge and experience of fungal infections (mycoses) among clinical doctors in Senegal\",\"authors\":\"Khadim Diongue , Boubou Dembélé , Mouhamadou Ndiaye , Mame Cheikh Seck , Mamadou Alpha Diallo , Aïda Sadikh Badiane , Daouda Ndiaye , Stéphane Ranque\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mycmed.2023.101408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In order to assess the knowledge and experience of fungal infections<span><span> (FIs) among clinicians in Senegal, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among medical practitioners in Senegal via a questionnaire designed with “Google Forms” between 24 January and 24 April 2022. A total of 100 clinicians responded to the questionnaire. Clinicians in the 31– 40-year-old age group formed the majority of respondents (51%). Male respondents were predominant (72%). Forty-one percent of respondents were general practitioners, 40% were specialist doctors, and the rest were residents. Dermatologists were the most common at 15% (6/40). In terms of clinicians’ general knowledge of fungi, FIs and their therapeutic management, an average of 70% correct answers was recorded. The majority (70%) of respondents cared for between two to four different categories of patients at risk of invasive FIs (IFIs) at a time, with diabetes predominating. Eighty percent confirmed that they had been confronted with FIs, including 43% with superficial FIs, 3% with subcutaneous FIs and 5% with IFIs. Thirty-four percent of doctors stated that they had never suspected an IFI. </span>Candidiasis<span><span> was the most commonly mentioned mycosis by doctors. To support the diagnosis of these FIs, 22% of the clinicians said that they had recourse only to the clinical diagnosis. In total, 79% of clinicians responded that they had never used an antifungal </span>chemoprophylaxis. In addition, 28% and 22% of practicing physicians chose a combination of antifungals for the chemoprophylaxis of </span></span></span>invasive candidiasis<span> and invasive aspergillosis, respectively. This survey shows that both clinicians’ knowledge and experience of fungi, antifungals, FIs and their therapeutic management, as well as chemoprophylaxis, need to be improved. Indeed, half of the clinicians seem to be unaware of the incidence of FIs, in particular IFIs, which, nevertheless, represent some of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de mycologie medicale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de mycologie medicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1156523323000525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de mycologie medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1156523323000525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of knowledge and experience of fungal infections (mycoses) among clinical doctors in Senegal
In order to assess the knowledge and experience of fungal infections (FIs) among clinicians in Senegal, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among medical practitioners in Senegal via a questionnaire designed with “Google Forms” between 24 January and 24 April 2022. A total of 100 clinicians responded to the questionnaire. Clinicians in the 31– 40-year-old age group formed the majority of respondents (51%). Male respondents were predominant (72%). Forty-one percent of respondents were general practitioners, 40% were specialist doctors, and the rest were residents. Dermatologists were the most common at 15% (6/40). In terms of clinicians’ general knowledge of fungi, FIs and their therapeutic management, an average of 70% correct answers was recorded. The majority (70%) of respondents cared for between two to four different categories of patients at risk of invasive FIs (IFIs) at a time, with diabetes predominating. Eighty percent confirmed that they had been confronted with FIs, including 43% with superficial FIs, 3% with subcutaneous FIs and 5% with IFIs. Thirty-four percent of doctors stated that they had never suspected an IFI. Candidiasis was the most commonly mentioned mycosis by doctors. To support the diagnosis of these FIs, 22% of the clinicians said that they had recourse only to the clinical diagnosis. In total, 79% of clinicians responded that they had never used an antifungal chemoprophylaxis. In addition, 28% and 22% of practicing physicians chose a combination of antifungals for the chemoprophylaxis of invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis, respectively. This survey shows that both clinicians’ knowledge and experience of fungi, antifungals, FIs and their therapeutic management, as well as chemoprophylaxis, need to be improved. Indeed, half of the clinicians seem to be unaware of the incidence of FIs, in particular IFIs, which, nevertheless, represent some of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world.
期刊介绍:
The Journal de Mycologie Medicale / Journal of Medical Mycology (JMM) publishes in English works dealing with human and animal mycology. The subjects treated are focused in particular on clinical, diagnostic, epidemiological, immunological, medical, pathological, preventive or therapeutic aspects of mycoses. Also covered are basic aspects linked primarily with morphology (electronic and photonic microscopy), physiology, biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology, immunochemistry, genetics, taxonomy or phylogeny of pathogenic or opportunistic fungi and actinomycetes in humans or animals. Studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi cannot be considered without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.
JMM publishes (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews (and minireviews), case reports, technical notes, letters to the editor and information. Only clinical cases with real originality (new species, new clinical present action, new geographical localization, etc.), and fully documented (identification methods, results, etc.), will be considered.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.