商业上可用的深度学习重建膝关节MR成像在1.5T时比在3T时传统重建成像具有更高的图像质量:一项正常的志愿者研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hiroyuki Akai, Koichiro Yasaka, Haruto Sugawara, Taku Tajima, Masaaki Akahane, Naoki Yoshioka, Kuni Ohtomo, Osamu Abe, Shigeru Kiryu
{"title":"商业上可用的深度学习重建膝关节MR成像在1.5T时比在3T时传统重建成像具有更高的图像质量:一项正常的志愿者研究。","authors":"Hiroyuki Akai,&nbsp;Koichiro Yasaka,&nbsp;Haruto Sugawara,&nbsp;Taku Tajima,&nbsp;Masaaki Akahane,&nbsp;Naoki Yoshioka,&nbsp;Kuni Ohtomo,&nbsp;Osamu Abe,&nbsp;Shigeru Kiryu","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is equal to or higher than that of 3T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Proton density-weighted images of the right knee of 27 healthy volunteers were obtained by 3T and 1.5T MRI scanners using similar imaging parameters (21 for high resolution image and 6 for normal resolution image). Commercially available DLR was applied to the 1.5T images to obtain 1.5T/DLR images. The 3T and 1.5T/DLR images were compared subjectively for visibility of structures, image noise, artifacts, and overall diagnostic acceptability and objectively. One-way ANOVA and Friedman tests were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the high resolution images, all of the anatomical structures, except for bone, were depicted significantly better on the 1.5T/DLR compared with 3T images. Image noise scored statistically lower and overall diagnostic acceptability scored higher on the 1.5T/DLR images. The contrast between lateral meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.89 ± 1.30 vs. 4.34 ± 0.87, P < 0.001), and also the contrast between medial meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.12 ± 0.93 vs. 3.87 ± 0.56, P < 0.001). Similar image quality improvement by DLR was observed for the normal resolution images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 1.5T/DLR images can achieve less noise, more precise visualization of the meniscus and ligaments, and higher overall image quality compared with the 3T images acquired using a similar protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"353-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/b2/mrms-22-353.PMC10449552.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Akai,&nbsp;Koichiro Yasaka,&nbsp;Haruto Sugawara,&nbsp;Taku Tajima,&nbsp;Masaaki Akahane,&nbsp;Naoki Yoshioka,&nbsp;Kuni Ohtomo,&nbsp;Osamu Abe,&nbsp;Shigeru Kiryu\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is equal to or higher than that of 3T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Proton density-weighted images of the right knee of 27 healthy volunteers were obtained by 3T and 1.5T MRI scanners using similar imaging parameters (21 for high resolution image and 6 for normal resolution image). Commercially available DLR was applied to the 1.5T images to obtain 1.5T/DLR images. The 3T and 1.5T/DLR images were compared subjectively for visibility of structures, image noise, artifacts, and overall diagnostic acceptability and objectively. One-way ANOVA and Friedman tests were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the high resolution images, all of the anatomical structures, except for bone, were depicted significantly better on the 1.5T/DLR compared with 3T images. Image noise scored statistically lower and overall diagnostic acceptability scored higher on the 1.5T/DLR images. The contrast between lateral meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.89 ± 1.30 vs. 4.34 ± 0.87, P < 0.001), and also the contrast between medial meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.12 ± 0.93 vs. 3.87 ± 0.56, P < 0.001). Similar image quality improvement by DLR was observed for the normal resolution images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 1.5T/DLR images can achieve less noise, more precise visualization of the meniscus and ligaments, and higher overall image quality compared with the 3T images acquired using a similar protocol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"353-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/b2/mrms-22-353.PMC10449552.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过应用深度学习重建(deep learning reconstruction, DLR)评估膝关节1.5T磁共振成像(MRI)图像质量是否等于或高于3T MRI。方法:27例健康志愿者,采用相似成像参数(高分辨率成像21张,正常分辨率成像6张)的3T和1.5T MRI扫描仪,获取右膝质子密度加权图像。将市售DLR应用于1.5T图像,得到1.5T/DLR图像。主观上比较3T和1.5T/DLR图像的结构可见性、图像噪声、伪影、总体诊断可接受性和客观上。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和Friedman检验。结果:对于高分辨率图像,1.5T/DLR对除骨外的所有解剖结构的描绘均优于3T图像。在1.5T/DLR图像上,图像噪声得分较低,总体诊断可接受性得分较高。1.5T/DLR图像的外侧半月板与关节软骨的对比(5.89±1.30 vs. 4.34±0.87,P < 0.001), 1.5T/DLR图像的内侧半月板与关节软骨的对比(5.12±0.93 vs. 3.87±0.56,P < 0.001)显著高于外侧半月板。DLR对正常分辨率图像的图像质量也有类似的改善。结论:与采用相同方案获得的3T图像相比,1.5T/DLR图像噪声更小,能更精确地显示半月板和韧带,整体图像质量更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.

Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.

Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.

Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is equal to or higher than that of 3T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR).

Methods: Proton density-weighted images of the right knee of 27 healthy volunteers were obtained by 3T and 1.5T MRI scanners using similar imaging parameters (21 for high resolution image and 6 for normal resolution image). Commercially available DLR was applied to the 1.5T images to obtain 1.5T/DLR images. The 3T and 1.5T/DLR images were compared subjectively for visibility of structures, image noise, artifacts, and overall diagnostic acceptability and objectively. One-way ANOVA and Friedman tests were used for the statistical analyses.

Results: For the high resolution images, all of the anatomical structures, except for bone, were depicted significantly better on the 1.5T/DLR compared with 3T images. Image noise scored statistically lower and overall diagnostic acceptability scored higher on the 1.5T/DLR images. The contrast between lateral meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.89 ± 1.30 vs. 4.34 ± 0.87, P < 0.001), and also the contrast between medial meniscus and articular cartilage of the 1.5T/DLR images was significantly higher (5.12 ± 0.93 vs. 3.87 ± 0.56, P < 0.001). Similar image quality improvement by DLR was observed for the normal resolution images.

Conclusion: The 1.5T/DLR images can achieve less noise, more precise visualization of the meniscus and ligaments, and higher overall image quality compared with the 3T images acquired using a similar protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信