基于深度学习算法的腰椎快速高质量MRI方案:与标准方案的图像质量和扫描时间比较。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9
Marta Zerunian, Francesco Pucciarelli, Damiano Caruso, Domenico De Santis, Michela Polici, Benedetta Masci, Ilaria Nacci, Antonella Del Gaudio, Giuseppe Argento, Andrea Redler, Andrea Laghi
{"title":"基于深度学习算法的腰椎快速高质量MRI方案:与标准方案的图像质量和扫描时间比较。","authors":"Marta Zerunian, Francesco Pucciarelli, Damiano Caruso, Domenico De Santis, Michela Polici, Benedetta Masci, Ilaria Nacci, Antonella Del Gaudio, Giuseppe Argento, Andrea Redler, Andrea Laghi","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78-0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%).</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Zerunian, Francesco Pucciarelli, Damiano Caruso, Domenico De Santis, Michela Polici, Benedetta Masci, Ilaria Nacci, Antonella Del Gaudio, Giuseppe Argento, Andrea Redler, Andrea Laghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78-0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"151-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较一种新的基于深度学习的重建(DLR)算法与腰椎标准MRI方案之间的定量和主观图像质量、扫描时间和诊断置信度。材料与方法:2021年9月至2023年5月,80名健康志愿者行1.5T腰椎MRI检查。协议采集包括矢状面T1和t2加权快速自旋回波和短tau反演恢复图像以及轴向多片t2加权快速自旋回波图像。所有序列均采用DLR算法和标准协议获取。两名放射科医生对重建技术一无所知,在共识阅读中进行了定量和定性的图像质量分析;诊断信心也被评估。通过计算信噪比(SNR)和噪声对比比(CNR)对图像质量进行定量分析。定性图像质量分析和诊断信度评估与五点李克特量表。扫描时间也进行了比较。结论:DLR应用于1.5T MRI是一种可行的腰椎成像方法,与标准方案相比,提供更高图像质量和相似诊断置信度的形态学序列,可显着节省时间(高达50%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol.

Objective: The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine.

Materials and methods: Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared.

Results: DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78-0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol.

Conclusion: DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信