记录接受癌症导向疗法的癌症患者的不孕风险讨论:加州大学戴维斯分校癌症中心的经验。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1089/jayao.2023.0034
Colleen McCann, Natalie Kamiyama, Debra Burgess, Angela E Usher, Jeffrey Fine, Machelle Wilson, Andrea Iannucci, Gary S Leiserowitz, Marcio Malogolowkin
{"title":"记录接受癌症导向疗法的癌症患者的不孕风险讨论:加州大学戴维斯分校癌症中心的经验。","authors":"Colleen McCann, Natalie Kamiyama, Debra Burgess, Angela E Usher, Jeffrey Fine, Machelle Wilson, Andrea Iannucci, Gary S Leiserowitz, Marcio Malogolowkin","doi":"10.1089/jayao.2023.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> A complication of cancer-directed therapy that often goes undiscussed is infertility. Although guidelines recommend addressing the possibility of infertility and fertility preservation approaches before initiating treatment, an internal review at our institution showed only 49% of female patients had infertility risk counseling documented. As a result, a fertility assessment communication was added into all oncology treatment plans to improve rates of fertility discussion and documentation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective observational study included newly diagnosed patients of childbearing potential who initiated cancer-directed therapy between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. Patients who were no longer of childbearing potential due to age or surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into pre- and post-implementation groups to assess the impact of the fertility assessment communication implemented on November 1, 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 152 patients met inclusion criteria, with 80 patients in the pre-implementation group and 72 patients in the post-implementation group. The primary outcome of documentation of infertility risk discussion was 47.5% in the pre-implementation group and 86.1% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Discussion of fertility preservation options was documented in 28.7% of the pre-implementation group and 43.1% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> = 0.13). In the pre-implementation group, 5% underwent fertility preservation versus 27.8% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Of the 27 patients who received fertility preservation, 13 received hormonal therapy, 11 sperm banking, and 3 egg harvesting. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This intervention significantly increased rates of infertility risk discussion and fertility preservation approaches received. There are opportunities to help patients receive fertility preservation, especially sperm banking and egg harvesting.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documentation of Infertility Risk Discussion in Cancer Patients Receiving Cancer-Directed Therapy: The UC Davis Cancer Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen McCann, Natalie Kamiyama, Debra Burgess, Angela E Usher, Jeffrey Fine, Machelle Wilson, Andrea Iannucci, Gary S Leiserowitz, Marcio Malogolowkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jayao.2023.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> A complication of cancer-directed therapy that often goes undiscussed is infertility. Although guidelines recommend addressing the possibility of infertility and fertility preservation approaches before initiating treatment, an internal review at our institution showed only 49% of female patients had infertility risk counseling documented. As a result, a fertility assessment communication was added into all oncology treatment plans to improve rates of fertility discussion and documentation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective observational study included newly diagnosed patients of childbearing potential who initiated cancer-directed therapy between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. Patients who were no longer of childbearing potential due to age or surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into pre- and post-implementation groups to assess the impact of the fertility assessment communication implemented on November 1, 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 152 patients met inclusion criteria, with 80 patients in the pre-implementation group and 72 patients in the post-implementation group. The primary outcome of documentation of infertility risk discussion was 47.5% in the pre-implementation group and 86.1% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Discussion of fertility preservation options was documented in 28.7% of the pre-implementation group and 43.1% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> = 0.13). In the pre-implementation group, 5% underwent fertility preservation versus 27.8% in the post-implementation group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Of the 27 patients who received fertility preservation, 13 received hormonal therapy, 11 sperm banking, and 3 egg harvesting. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This intervention significantly increased rates of infertility risk discussion and fertility preservation approaches received. There are opportunities to help patients receive fertility preservation, especially sperm banking and egg harvesting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2023.0034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2023.0034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症导向治疗的一个并发症是不孕症,但这一问题往往没有得到讨论。尽管指南建议在开始治疗前讨论不孕症的可能性和保留生育能力的方法,但本机构的一项内部审查显示,只有 49% 的女性患者有不孕症风险咨询记录。因此,我们在所有肿瘤治疗计划中加入了生育评估沟通,以提高生育讨论和记录的比例。研究方法这项回顾性观察研究纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间开始接受癌症导向治疗的新确诊育龄患者。因年龄或手术而不再具有生育能力的患者除外。患者被分为实施前和实施后两组,以评估 2020 年 11 月 1 日实施的生育力评估交流的影响。结果共有 152 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 80 名患者属于实施前组,72 名患者属于实施后组。不孕不育风险讨论记录的主要结果是,实施前组为 47.5%,实施后组为 86.1%(P = 0.13)。在实施前组别中,5% 的患者接受了生育力保存,而在实施后组别中,27.8% 的患者接受了生育力保存(P = 0.0001)。在接受生育力保存的 27 名患者中,13 人接受了激素治疗,11 人接受了精子库治疗,3 人接受了采卵治疗。结论这项干预措施大大提高了不孕不育风险讨论率和接受生育力保存方法的比例。有机会帮助患者接受生育力保存,尤其是精子库和卵子采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Documentation of Infertility Risk Discussion in Cancer Patients Receiving Cancer-Directed Therapy: The UC Davis Cancer Center Experience.

Purpose: A complication of cancer-directed therapy that often goes undiscussed is infertility. Although guidelines recommend addressing the possibility of infertility and fertility preservation approaches before initiating treatment, an internal review at our institution showed only 49% of female patients had infertility risk counseling documented. As a result, a fertility assessment communication was added into all oncology treatment plans to improve rates of fertility discussion and documentation. Methods: This retrospective observational study included newly diagnosed patients of childbearing potential who initiated cancer-directed therapy between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. Patients who were no longer of childbearing potential due to age or surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into pre- and post-implementation groups to assess the impact of the fertility assessment communication implemented on November 1, 2020. Results: A total of 152 patients met inclusion criteria, with 80 patients in the pre-implementation group and 72 patients in the post-implementation group. The primary outcome of documentation of infertility risk discussion was 47.5% in the pre-implementation group and 86.1% in the post-implementation group (p < 0.0001). Discussion of fertility preservation options was documented in 28.7% of the pre-implementation group and 43.1% in the post-implementation group (p = 0.13). In the pre-implementation group, 5% underwent fertility preservation versus 27.8% in the post-implementation group (p = 0.0001). Of the 27 patients who received fertility preservation, 13 received hormonal therapy, 11 sperm banking, and 3 egg harvesting. Conclusion: This intervention significantly increased rates of infertility risk discussion and fertility preservation approaches received. There are opportunities to help patients receive fertility preservation, especially sperm banking and egg harvesting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信