{"title":"阵发性房颤冷冻球囊和热球囊导管消融后自主神经调节的不同时间效应。","authors":"Noriyuki Suzuki, Yasuya Inden, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Yuuki Shimizu, Shingo Narita, Kei Hiramatsu, Ryota Yamauchi, Ryo Watanabe, Naoki Tsurumi, Masafumi Shimojo, Kazumasa Suga, Yukiomi Tsuji, Rei Shibata, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01581-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have reported on the quantitative evaluation of autonomic nerve modification after balloon ablation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and their relationship with prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 234 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation (n = 190) or hotballoon ablation (n = 44) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed on all patients using a 3-min electrocardiogram at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. HRV parameters and prognoses were compared between the two balloon systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ln low-frequency (LF), Ln high-frequency (HF), standard deviation of the R-R intervals (SDNN), and RR intervals significantly decreased after 1 month in both groups, but the changes were more pronounced in the cryoballoon group than in the hotballoon group. In contrast, HRV indices in the hotballoon ablation group decreased gradually and reached their lowest point 3-to-6 months after the procedure, which was later than in the cryoballoon ablation group. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. HRV parameters changed similarly in the cryoballoon group, regardless of recurrence. However, patients with recurrence had significantly higher SDNN and Ln LF at 12 months than those without recurrence in the hotballoon group (41.2 ± 39.3 ms vs. 18.5 ± 12.6 ms, p = 0.006, and 2.2 ± 0.7 ms<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 ms<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The time course of HRV changes differed between cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations. Hence, the two balloon systems may have distinct effects on the ANS and its role in prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"355-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different time course effect of autonomic nervous modulation after cryoballoon and hotballoon catheter ablations for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Noriyuki Suzuki, Yasuya Inden, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Yuuki Shimizu, Shingo Narita, Kei Hiramatsu, Ryota Yamauchi, Ryo Watanabe, Naoki Tsurumi, Masafumi Shimojo, Kazumasa Suga, Yukiomi Tsuji, Rei Shibata, Toyoaki Murohara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-023-01581-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have reported on the quantitative evaluation of autonomic nerve modification after balloon ablation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and their relationship with prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 234 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation (n = 190) or hotballoon ablation (n = 44) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed on all patients using a 3-min electrocardiogram at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. HRV parameters and prognoses were compared between the two balloon systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ln low-frequency (LF), Ln high-frequency (HF), standard deviation of the R-R intervals (SDNN), and RR intervals significantly decreased after 1 month in both groups, but the changes were more pronounced in the cryoballoon group than in the hotballoon group. In contrast, HRV indices in the hotballoon ablation group decreased gradually and reached their lowest point 3-to-6 months after the procedure, which was later than in the cryoballoon ablation group. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. HRV parameters changed similarly in the cryoballoon group, regardless of recurrence. However, patients with recurrence had significantly higher SDNN and Ln LF at 12 months than those without recurrence in the hotballoon group (41.2 ± 39.3 ms vs. 18.5 ± 12.6 ms, p = 0.006, and 2.2 ± 0.7 ms<sup>2</sup> vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 ms<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The time course of HRV changes differed between cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations. Hence, the two balloon systems may have distinct effects on the ANS and its role in prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"355-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01581-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01581-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于球囊消融术后自主神经修复的定量评价研究很少。因此,本研究旨在评估低温球囊和热球囊消融对自主神经系统(ANS)的影响及其与预后的关系。方法:我们纳入234例接受冷冻球囊消融(n = 190)或热球囊消融(n = 44)治疗阵发性心房颤动的患者。在消融后的基线、1、3、6和12个月,使用3分钟心电图对所有患者进行心率变异性(HRV)分析。比较两种球囊系统的HRV参数和预后。结果:1个月后,两组Ln低频(LF)、高频(HF)、R-R间隔标准差(SDNN)、RR间隔均显著降低,但低温球囊组较热球囊组变化更明显。相比之下,热球囊消融组HRV指数逐渐下降,在术后3 ~ 6个月达到最低点,比低温球囊消融组晚。两组复发率无明显差异。无论是否复发,低温球囊组HRV参数变化相似。然而,在12个月时,复发患者的SDNN和Ln LF明显高于无复发患者(分别为41.2±39.3 ms比18.5±12.6 ms, p = 0.006; 2.2±0.7 ms2比1.5±0.7 ms2, p = 0.003)。结论:低温球囊消融与热球囊消融HRV变化的时间过程不同。因此,两种球囊系统可能对ANS及其在预后中的作用有不同的影响。
Different time course effect of autonomic nervous modulation after cryoballoon and hotballoon catheter ablations for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Background: Few studies have reported on the quantitative evaluation of autonomic nerve modification after balloon ablation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and their relationship with prognosis.
Methods: We included 234 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation (n = 190) or hotballoon ablation (n = 44) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed on all patients using a 3-min electrocardiogram at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. HRV parameters and prognoses were compared between the two balloon systems.
Results: Ln low-frequency (LF), Ln high-frequency (HF), standard deviation of the R-R intervals (SDNN), and RR intervals significantly decreased after 1 month in both groups, but the changes were more pronounced in the cryoballoon group than in the hotballoon group. In contrast, HRV indices in the hotballoon ablation group decreased gradually and reached their lowest point 3-to-6 months after the procedure, which was later than in the cryoballoon ablation group. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. HRV parameters changed similarly in the cryoballoon group, regardless of recurrence. However, patients with recurrence had significantly higher SDNN and Ln LF at 12 months than those without recurrence in the hotballoon group (41.2 ± 39.3 ms vs. 18.5 ± 12.6 ms, p = 0.006, and 2.2 ± 0.7 ms2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 ms2, p = 0.003, respectively).
Conclusions: The time course of HRV changes differed between cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations. Hence, the two balloon systems may have distinct effects on the ANS and its role in prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.