Adam Vujic, Loren Mowszowski, Susanne Meares, Jennifer Batchelor, Sharon L Naismith
{"title":"并非所有的精神刺激活动都是相似的:来自四因素模型的见解以及对晚年认知的影响。","authors":"Adam Vujic, Loren Mowszowski, Susanne Meares, Jennifer Batchelor, Sharon L Naismith","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed <i>CSA-Processing</i>, <i>CSA-Challenging</i>, <i>CSA-Connecting</i> and <i>CSA-Socializing</i>. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except <i>CSA-Challenging</i> were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, <i>CSA-Challenging</i> was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while <i>CSA-Processing</i> was positively correlated with executive function. <i>CSA-Socializing</i> had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not all mentally stimulating activities are alike: insights from a 4-factor model and implications for late-life cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Vujic, Loren Mowszowski, Susanne Meares, Jennifer Batchelor, Sharon L Naismith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed <i>CSA-Processing</i>, <i>CSA-Challenging</i>, <i>CSA-Connecting</i> and <i>CSA-Socializing</i>. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except <i>CSA-Challenging</i> were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, <i>CSA-Challenging</i> was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while <i>CSA-Processing</i> was positively correlated with executive function. <i>CSA-Socializing</i> had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Not all mentally stimulating activities are alike: insights from a 4-factor model and implications for late-life cognition.
It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed CSA-Processing, CSA-Challenging, CSA-Connecting and CSA-Socializing. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except CSA-Challenging were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, CSA-Challenging was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while CSA-Processing was positively correlated with executive function. CSA-Socializing had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.
期刊介绍:
The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.