并非所有的精神刺激活动都是相似的:来自四因素模型的见解以及对晚年认知的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Adam Vujic, Loren Mowszowski, Susanne Meares, Jennifer Batchelor, Sharon L Naismith
{"title":"并非所有的精神刺激活动都是相似的:来自四因素模型的见解以及对晚年认知的影响。","authors":"Adam Vujic,&nbsp;Loren Mowszowski,&nbsp;Susanne Meares,&nbsp;Jennifer Batchelor,&nbsp;Sharon L Naismith","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed <i>CSA-Processing</i>, <i>CSA-Challenging</i>, <i>CSA-Connecting</i> and <i>CSA-Socializing</i>. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except <i>CSA-Challenging</i> were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, <i>CSA-Challenging</i> was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while <i>CSA-Processing</i> was positively correlated with executive function. <i>CSA-Socializing</i> had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not all mentally stimulating activities are alike: insights from a 4-factor model and implications for late-life cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Vujic,&nbsp;Loren Mowszowski,&nbsp;Susanne Meares,&nbsp;Jennifer Batchelor,&nbsp;Sharon L Naismith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed <i>CSA-Processing</i>, <i>CSA-Challenging</i>, <i>CSA-Connecting</i> and <i>CSA-Socializing</i>. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except <i>CSA-Challenging</i> were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, <i>CSA-Challenging</i> was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while <i>CSA-Processing</i> was positively correlated with executive function. <i>CSA-Socializing</i> had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2094878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还不清楚哪些特定的认知刺激活动最有可能增强老年人的认知储备。采用归纳方法,我们对504名主观和/或认知障碍的老年人进行了认知刺激活动问卷调查(CSA-Q)。探索性因子分析在一分为二的样本中确定了一个4因素结构,之后验证性因子分析交叉验证了模型。这4个因素保留了12个CSA-Q项目,分别被命名为csa -加工、csa -挑战、csa -连接和csa -社交。结果分析了相对于认知储备代理和神经心理学领域的因素权重。除csa挑战外,其他因素均与认知储备呈正相关。神经心理学上,csa挑战与加工速度、执行功能呈适度正相关,csa加工与执行功能呈显著正相关。csa -社会化与处理速度有小的正相关。我们的发现为老年刺激活动提供了新的见解,为纵向和干预研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not all mentally stimulating activities are alike: insights from a 4-factor model and implications for late-life cognition.

It is not yet known which specific qualities of cognitively stimulating activities are most likely to enhance cognitive reserve in older adults. Taking an inductive approach to this problem, we asked 504 older adults with subjective and/or cognitive impairment to complete the Cognitively Stimulating Activities Questionnaire (CSA-Q). Exploratory factor analysis identified a 4-factor structure within a split-half sample, after which confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated the model. Retaining 12 CSA-Q items, the 4 factors were dubbed CSA-Processing, CSA-ChallengingCSA-Connecting and CSA-Socializing. Resulting factor weights were analyzed relative to cognitive reserve proxies and neuropsychological domains. All factors except CSA-Challenging were positively linked to cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologically, CSA-Challenging was modestly and positively correlated with processing speed and executive function, while CSA-Processing was positively correlated with executive function. CSA-Socializing had a small positive correlation with processing speed. Our findings offer new insights into late-life stimulating activities, laying the groundwork for longitudinal and intervention studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信