{"title":"住院患者标准与延长镁输注速率的评价:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Halah Yaldo, Renee Paxton, Christopher Giuliano","doi":"10.1684/mrh.2023.0512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypomagnesemia is a common electrolyte abnormality in hospitalized patients. Prolonging the infusion rate of magnesium has been hypothesized to increase retention of magnesium, however, there is limited evidence to support prolonging the rate of infusion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the absolute change in serum magnesium levels from baseline to levels drawn within 24 hours after the end of infusion between two groups receiving standard or prolonged infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing patients receiving magnesium infusion at a standard rate of 0.5 gm/h to those receiving magnesium infusion at a prolonged rate of 0.17 gm/h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 276 patients, 138 were included in each group. No differences existed between the groups for any demographic variables (all p>0.05). The absolute change in serum magnesium level was 0.41 mg/dL versus 0.31 mg/dL in the standard and the prolonged infusion groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The length of stay after the initial magnesium dose was slightly longer with the prolonged infusion compared to the standard infusion, with a median of 2.9 days versus 3.6 days, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences existed between the groups for any secondary or safety outcomes (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitalized general patients did not benefit from the prolonged infusion of magnesium compared to standard infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":18159,"journal":{"name":"Magnesium research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of standard versus prolonged magnesium infusion rates in hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Halah Yaldo, Renee Paxton, Christopher Giuliano\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/mrh.2023.0512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypomagnesemia is a common electrolyte abnormality in hospitalized patients. Prolonging the infusion rate of magnesium has been hypothesized to increase retention of magnesium, however, there is limited evidence to support prolonging the rate of infusion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the absolute change in serum magnesium levels from baseline to levels drawn within 24 hours after the end of infusion between two groups receiving standard or prolonged infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing patients receiving magnesium infusion at a standard rate of 0.5 gm/h to those receiving magnesium infusion at a prolonged rate of 0.17 gm/h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 276 patients, 138 were included in each group. No differences existed between the groups for any demographic variables (all p>0.05). The absolute change in serum magnesium level was 0.41 mg/dL versus 0.31 mg/dL in the standard and the prolonged infusion groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The length of stay after the initial magnesium dose was slightly longer with the prolonged infusion compared to the standard infusion, with a median of 2.9 days versus 3.6 days, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences existed between the groups for any secondary or safety outcomes (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitalized general patients did not benefit from the prolonged infusion of magnesium compared to standard infusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnesium research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnesium research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/mrh.2023.0512\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnesium research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/mrh.2023.0512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of standard versus prolonged magnesium infusion rates in hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Background: Hypomagnesemia is a common electrolyte abnormality in hospitalized patients. Prolonging the infusion rate of magnesium has been hypothesized to increase retention of magnesium, however, there is limited evidence to support prolonging the rate of infusion.
Aim: To compare the absolute change in serum magnesium levels from baseline to levels drawn within 24 hours after the end of infusion between two groups receiving standard or prolonged infusion.
Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing patients receiving magnesium infusion at a standard rate of 0.5 gm/h to those receiving magnesium infusion at a prolonged rate of 0.17 gm/h.
Results: Of a total of 276 patients, 138 were included in each group. No differences existed between the groups for any demographic variables (all p>0.05). The absolute change in serum magnesium level was 0.41 mg/dL versus 0.31 mg/dL in the standard and the prolonged infusion groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The length of stay after the initial magnesium dose was slightly longer with the prolonged infusion compared to the standard infusion, with a median of 2.9 days versus 3.6 days, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences existed between the groups for any secondary or safety outcomes (all p>0.05).
Conclusion: Hospitalized general patients did not benefit from the prolonged infusion of magnesium compared to standard infusion.
期刊介绍:
Magnesium Research, the official journal of the international Society for the Development of Research on Magnesium (SDRM), has been the benchmark journal on the use of magnesium in biomedicine for more than 30 years.
This quarterly publication provides regular updates on multinational and multidisciplinary research into magnesium, bringing together original experimental and clinical articles, correspondence, Letters to the Editor, comments on latest news, general features, summaries of relevant articles from other journals, and reports and statements from national and international conferences and symposiums.
Indexed in the leading medical databases, Magnesium Research is an essential journal for specialists and general practitioners, for basic and clinical researchers, for practising doctors and academics.